IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v26y2017i1d10.1007_s11749-016-0497-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sure screening by ranking the canonical correlations

Author

Listed:
  • Xin-Bing Kong

    (CASER, Soochow University)

  • Zhi Liu

    (University of Macau and UM Zhuhai Research Institute)

  • Yuan Yao

    (Hong Kong Baptist University)

  • Wang Zhou

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

The sure independence screening procedure by ranking the marginal Pearson correlation is well documented in literatures and works satisfactorily in the ultra-high dimensional case. However, this marginal Person correlation learning would easily miss the variable that is marginally uncorrelated with the response but correlated with the response jointly with some other variables. This failure in missing an important variable is due to the fact that the marginal Pearson correlation does not use the joint information of the response and a set of covariates. In this paper, we introduce a new screening method which leaves a variable into the active set if it jointly with some other variables has a high canonical correlation with the response. This is accomplished via ranking canonical correlations between the response and all possible sets of k variables. Our results show that the procedure has the sure screening property and substantially reduces the dimensionality to a moderate size against the sample size. Extensive simulations demonstrate that our new method performs substantially better than the existing sure independence screening approaches based on the marginal Pearson correlation or Kental’s tau rank correlation. A real data set is also analyzed by implementing our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin-Bing Kong & Zhi Liu & Yuan Yao & Wang Zhou, 2017. "Sure screening by ranking the canonical correlations," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 46-70, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:26:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11749-016-0497-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-016-0497-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11749-016-0497-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-016-0497-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Hui, 2006. "The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1418-1429, December.
    2. Zhao, Sihai Dave & Li, Yi, 2012. "Principled sure independence screening for Cox models with ultra-high-dimensional covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 397-411.
    3. Fan, Jianqing & Feng, Yang & Song, Rui, 2011. "Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Additive Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 544-557.
    4. Hengjian Cui & Runze Li & Wei Zhong, 2015. "Model-Free Feature Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Discriminant Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(510), pages 630-641, June.
    5. Runze Li & Wei Zhong & Liping Zhu, 2012. "Feature Screening via Distance Correlation Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 1129-1139, September.
    6. Jianqing Fan & Yunbei Ma & Wei Dai, 2014. "Nonparametric Independence Screening in Sparse Ultra-High-Dimensional Varying Coefficient Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 1270-1284, September.
    7. Jianqing Fan & Jinchi Lv, 2008. "Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 849-911, November.
    8. Peter Hall & D. M. Titterington & Jing‐Hao Xue, 2009. "Tilting methods for assessing the influence of components in a classifier," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 783-803, September.
    9. Ming Yuan & Yi Lin, 2006. "Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(1), pages 49-67, February.
    10. Antoniadis A. & Fan J., 2001. "Regularization of Wavelet Approximations," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 939-967, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. He, Yong & Zhang, Liang & Ji, Jiadong & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 568-582.
    2. Yang, Guangren & Zhang, Ling & Li, Runze & Huang, Yuan, 2019. "Feature screening in ultrahigh-dimensional varying-coefficient Cox model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 284-297.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Yong & Zhang, Liang & Ji, Jiadong & Zhang, Xinsheng, 2019. "Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 568-582.
    2. Zhang, Shucong & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Variable screening for ultrahigh dimensional heterogeneous data via conditional quantile correlations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Liming Wang & Xingxiang Li & Xiaoqing Wang & Peng Lai, 2022. "Unified mean-variance feature screening for ultrahigh-dimensional regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 1887-1918, September.
    4. Xiangyu Wang & Chenlei Leng, 2016. "High dimensional ordinary least squares projection for screening variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(3), pages 589-611, June.
    5. Zhong, Wei & Wang, Jiping & Chen, Xiaolin, 2021. "Censored mean variance sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Jing Zhang & Haibo Zhou & Yanyan Liu & Jianwen Cai, 2021. "Conditional screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data in case-cohort studies," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 632-661, October.
    7. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    8. Loann David Denis Desboulets, 2018. "A Review on Variable Selection in Regression Analysis," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Zhang, Jing & Wang, Qihua & Kang, Jian, 2020. "Feature screening under missing indicator imputation with non-ignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Zhang, Shucong & Pan, Jing & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "Robust conditional nonparametric independence screening for ultrahigh-dimensional data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 95-101.
    11. Jing Zhang & Guosheng Yin & Yanyan Liu & Yuanshan Wu, 2018. "Censored cumulative residual independent screening for ultrahigh-dimensional survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 273-292, April.
    12. Xia, Xiaochao & Yang, Hu & Li, Jialiang, 2016. "Feature screening for generalized varying coefficient models with application to dichotomous responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 85-97.
    13. Sheng, Ying & Wang, Qihua, 2020. "Model-free feature screening for ultrahigh dimensional classification," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Baiguo An & Guozhong Feng & Jianhua Guo, 2022. "Interaction Identification and Clique Screening for Classification with Ultra-high Dimensional Discrete Features," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(1), pages 122-146, March.
    15. Dong, Yuexiao & Yu, Zhou & Zhu, Liping, 2020. "Model-free variable selection for conditional mean in regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Akira Shinkyu, 2023. "Forward Selection for Feature Screening and Structure Identification in Varying Coefficient Models," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 85(1), pages 485-511, February.
    17. Xi Wu & Shifeng Xiong & Weiyan Mu, 2023. "An Ensemble Method for Feature Screening," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Yuan, Qingcong & Chen, Xianyan & Ke, Chenlu & Yin, Xiangrong, 2022. "Independence index sufficient variable screening for categorical responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Liu, Jicai & Si, Yuefeng & Niu, Yong & Zhang, Riquan, 2022. "Projection quantile correlation and its use in high-dimensional grouped variable screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Jing Zhang & Qihua Wang & Xuan Wang, 2022. "Surrogate-variable-based model-free feature screening for survival data under the general censoring mechanism," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 379-397, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:26:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11749-016-0497-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.