IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stabio/v10y2018i2d10.1007_s12561-017-9196-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Recent Advances on Statistical Approaches for Planning Multi-regional Clinical Trials

Author

Listed:
  • H. M. James Hung

    (FDA)

  • Xiangmin Zhang

    (FDA)

  • Sue-Jane Wang

    (FDA)

Abstract

Many multi-regional clinical trials are faced with possible heterogeneity in treatment effect among regions and consequently the interpretation of the trial results is quite challenging. Regional heterogeneity can be caused by the differences in intrinsic factors, extrinsic factors or trial/data quality among regions. An apparent regional difference in treatment effect can be caused by a play of chance or sampling variability. In another aspect, regional heterogeneity may have substantial ramifications on sample size estimation for planning a multi-regional trial, as stipulated in Hung et al. (Pharm Stat 9:173–178, 2010), Lan and Pinheiro (Stat Biosci 14:235–244, 2012) and Quan et al. (Stat Med 33:2191–2205, 2014). Analyses of multi-regional trials are commonly based on a fixed-effect model assuming that the true treatment effects in all regions are equal in magnitude which may or may not be practical. Random-effect modelling has been considered as an alternative to deal with regional heterogeneity. In this research work we shall discuss the statistical implications of the statistical modelling approaches on the type I error probability and statistical power associated with testing the global treatment effect. We also develop formulae to assess the probability that some regions may falsely show an apparent negative trend by chance or sampling variability. As another alternative, a fixed-effect model that accounts for acceptable regional heterogeneity will be introduced.

Suggested Citation

  • H. M. James Hung & Xiangmin Zhang & Sue-Jane Wang, 2018. "Some Recent Advances on Statistical Approaches for Planning Multi-regional Clinical Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 10(2), pages 460-472, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:10:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-017-9196-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12561-017-9196-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12561-017-9196-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12561-017-9196-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean A. Follmann & Michael A. Proschan, 1999. "Valid Inference in Random Effects Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 732-737, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jss:jstsof:36:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    3. repec:jss:jstsof:30:i07 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Knapp, Guido & Hartung, Joachim, 2000. "Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials," Technical Reports 2000,09, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    5. Böckenhoff, Annette & Hartung, Joachim, 2000. "Meta-analysis: Different methods - different conclusions?," Technical Reports 2000,08, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    6. Ao Huang & Kosuke Morikawa & Tim Friede & Satoshi Hattori, 2023. "Adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis via inverse probability weighting using clinical trial registries," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2089-2102, September.
    7. Janie McDonald & Patrick D. Gerard & Christopher S. McMahan & William R. Schucany, 2016. "Exact-Permutation-Based Sign Tests for Clustered Binary Data Via Weighted and Unweighted Test Statistics," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 698-712, December.
    8. Schmidli, Heinz & Neuenschwander, Beat & Friede, Tim, 2017. "Meta-analytic-predictive use of historical variance data for the design and analysis of clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 100-110.
    9. Han Chen & Alisa K. Manning & Josée Dupuis, 2012. "A Method of Moments Estimator for Random Effect Multivariate Meta-Analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1278-1284, December.
    10. Kepher Henry Makambi, 2002. "On pooling data summaries in the absence of interactions “response-by-study”," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 11(1), pages 127-138, February.
    11. G. Baker Stuart & S. Lindeman Karen, 2013. "Revisiting a Discrepant Result: A Propensity Score Analysis, the Paired Availability Design for Historical Controls, and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 51-82, June.
    12. Keisuke Hanada & Tomoyuki Sugimoto, 2023. "Inference using an exact distribution of test statistic for random-effects meta-analysis," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(2), pages 281-302, April.
    13. Ding‐Geng Chen & Dungang Liu & Xiaoyi Min & Heping Zhang, 2020. "Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random‐effects meta‐analysis," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1319-1329, December.
    14. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David Reeves, 2010. "metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(3), pages 395-407, September.
    15. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David A Springate & David Reeves, 2013. "A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Marchetti, Dalmo & Wanke, Peter F., 2019. "Efficiency in rail transport: Evaluation of the main drivers through meta-analysis with resampling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 83-100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stabio:v:10:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s12561-017-9196-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.