IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v14y2022i2d10.1007_s12571-021-01244-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical stages for post-harvest losses and nutrition outcomes in the value chains of bush beans and nightshade in Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Klara Strecker

    (Technical University Eindhoven)

  • Verena Bitzer

    (Sustainable Economic Development and Gender, KIT Royal Tropical Institute
    Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University)

  • Froukje Kruijssen

    (Sustainable Economic Development and Gender, KIT Royal Tropical Institute)

Abstract

The reduction of post-harvest losses (PHLs) has been identified as a key pathway to food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa. However, despite policy prioritisation, knowledge about the severity of PHLs remains scant, especially when it comes to nutrient-dense crops such as African nightshade and bush beans. Therefore, this paper identifies loss hotspots, causes and effects throughout the value chains of nightshade and bush beans in eastern Uganda. Primary data collected following the Informal Food Loss Assessment Method, combined with small-scale load tracking and secondary data, allows for an analysis of physical, economic, quality, and nutritional losses throughout the value chains of both crops. Results show that in the bush bean value chain, severe physical and quality losses occur during post-harvest handling by farmers, leading to high economic losses at this stage of the chain. Nutritional losses are not expected to be significant in the bush bean value chain. By contrast, due to the shortness of the nightshade value chain, where produce is moved from harvest to consumption within one or two days, physical losses in most parts of the chain are relatively minor. Only at consumption stage, high physical losses occur. This is also the stage where economic losses and potential nutritional losses are most pronounced. The results of this study offer a deeper understanding of the value chain dynamics of bush beans and nightshade, including underlying gender relations, and identify concrete loss hotspots, upon which further research and practical interventions can build.

Suggested Citation

  • Klara Strecker & Verena Bitzer & Froukje Kruijssen, 2022. "Critical stages for post-harvest losses and nutrition outcomes in the value chains of bush beans and nightshade in Uganda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(2), pages 411-426, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01244-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-021-01244-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-021-01244-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-021-01244-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Cernansky, 2015. "The rise of Africa’s super vegetables," Nature, Nature, vol. 522(7555), pages 146-148, June.
    2. Doss, Cheryl R. & Morris, Michael L., 2001. "How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations?: The case of improved maize technology in Ghana," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 27-39, June.
    3. Gómez, Miguel I. & Ricketts, Katie D., 2013. "Food value chain transformations in developing countries - Selected hypotheses on nutritional implications," ESA Working Papers 288987, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    4. Chegere, Martin Julius, 2018. "Post-harvest losses reduction by small-scale maize farmers: The role of handling practices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-115.
    5. Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe & Stanslus Okurut & Susan Ajambo & Kephas Nowakunda & Dietmar Stoian & Diego Naziri, 2018. "Postharvest Losses and their Determinants: A Challenge to Creating a Sustainable Cooking Banana Value Chain in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Pandolfelli, Lauren, 2010. "Promising Approaches to Address the Needs of Poor Female Farmers: Resources, Constraints, and Interventions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 581-592, April.
    7. Chaboud, Géraldine, 2017. "Assessing food losses and waste with a methodological framework: Insights from a case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 188-197.
    8. Tanya Stathers & Deirdre Holcroft & Lisa Kitinoja & Brighton M. Mvumi & Alicia English & Oluwatoba Omotilewa & Megan Kocher & Jessica Ault & Maximo Torero, 2020. "A scoping review of interventions for crop postharvest loss reduction in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 821-835, October.
    9. Gómez, Miguel I. & Ricketts, Katie D., 2013. "Food value chain transformations in developing countries: Selected hypotheses on nutritional implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 139-150.
    10. Sheahan, Megan & Barrett, Christopher B., 2017. "Review: Food loss and waste in Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Affognon, Hippolyte & Mutungi, Christopher & Sanginga, Pascal & Borgemeister, Christian, 2015. "Unpacking Postharvest Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 49-68.
    12. Torell, Elin C. & Jamu, Daniel M. & Kanyerere, Geoffrey Z. & Chiwaula, Levison & Nagoli, Joseph & Kambewa, Patrick & Brooks, Alan & Freeman, Peter, 2020. "Assessing the economic impacts of post-harvest fisheries losses in Malawi," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:lic:licosd:42020 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. T. S. Mnimbo & J. Lyimo-Macha & J. K. Urassa & H. F. Mahoo & S. D. Tumbo & F. Graef, 2017. "Influence of gender on roles, choices of crop types and value chain upgrading strategies in semi-arid and sub-humid Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1173-1187, December.
    3. Xue Qu & Daizo Kojima & Laping Wu & Mitsuyoshi Ando, 2021. "The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Hory Chikez & Dirk Maier & Steve Sonka, 2021. "Mango Postharvest Technologies: An Observational Study of the Yieldwise Initiative in Kenya," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Apurba Shee & Sarah Mayanja & Eria Simba & Tanya Stathers & Aurelie Bechoff & Ben Bennett, 2019. "Determinants of postharvest losses along smallholder producers maize and Sweetpotato value chains: an ordered Probit analysis," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(5), pages 1101-1120, October.
    6. Daniel Faibil & Martin Agyemang & Owusu Amponsah & Himanshu Gupta & Simonov Kusi-Sarpong, 2021. "Assessing drivers of post-harvest losses: tangible and intangible resources’ perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 15785-15829, November.
    7. Shukla, Pallavi & Pullabhotla, Hemant K. & Baylis, Kathy, 2023. "The economics of reducing food losses: Experimental evidence from improved storage technology in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    8. Siphiw’okuhle Nohamba & Joseph P. Musara & Yonas T. Bahta & Abiodun A. Ogundeji, 2022. "Drivers of Postharvest Loss among Citrus Farmers in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa: A Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) Regression Model Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Manda, Julius & Feleke, Shiferaw & Mutungi, Christopher & Tufa, Adane H. & Mateete, Bekunda & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Alene, Arega D., 2024. "Assessing the speed of improved postharvest technology adoption in Tanzania: The role of social learning and agricultural extension services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Andre Croppenstedt & Markus Goldstein & Nina Rosas, 2013. "Gender and Agriculture: Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 79-109, February.
    11. Fisher, Monica & Kandiwa, Vongai, 2014. "Can agricultural input subsidies reduce the gender gap in modern maize adoption? Evidence from Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 101-111.
    12. Koen Dekeyser, 2019. "Land Investments, Food Systems Change and Democracy in Kenya and Mozambique," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 178-189.
    13. Lutengano Mwinuka & Khamaldin Daud Mutabazi & Frieder Graef & Stefan Sieber & Jeremia Makindara & Anthony Kimaro & Götz Uckert, 2017. "Simulated willingness of farmers to adopt fertilizer micro-dosing and rainwater harvesting technologies in semi-arid and sub-humid farming systems in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1237-1253, December.
    14. Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Martina De Giovanni, 2021. "Evaluating the Sustainability Dimensions in the Food Supply Chain: Literature Review and Research Routes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Montserrat Costa-Font & Cesar Revoredo-Giha, 2019. "Introduction of New Food Products in China: Is There a Trend towards Healthier and Safer Products?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Marenya, P. & Kassie, M. & Teklewold, H. & Erenstein, O. & Qaim, M. & Rahut, D., 2018. "Does the adoption of maize-legume cropping diversification and modern seeds affect nutritional security in Ethiopia? Evidence from panel data analysis," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277170, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Sirinya Phulkerd & Cut Novianti Rachmi & Mohd Jamil Sameeha & Elaine Q. Borazon & Anne-Marie Thow & Helen Trevena & Adila Fahmida Saptari & Yong Kang Cheah & Che Aniza Che Wel & Vanessa T. Marquez & T, 2022. "Identifying Opportunities for Strategic Policy Design to Address the Double Burden of Malnutrition through Healthier Retail Food: Protocol for South East Asia Obesogenic Food Environment (SEAOFE) Stud," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Katharine Tröger & Margareta Amy Lelea & Brigitte Kaufmann, 2018. "The Fine Line between Trusting and Cheating: Exploring Relationships between Actors in Ugandan Pineapple Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(5), pages 823-841, December.
    19. Hounsou, M & Dabade, D. Sylvain & Götz, B & Hounhouigan, MH & Honfo, GF & Albrecht, A & Kreyenschmidt, J & Hounhouigan, DJ, 2022. "Handling practices, quality and loss estimation along the value chain of waragashi, a soft cheese from Benin," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 22(07).
    20. Chegere, Martin Julius, 2018. "Post-harvest losses reduction by small-scale maize farmers: The role of handling practices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-115.
    21. Glover, Dominic & Poole, Nigel, 2019. "Principles of innovation to build nutrition-sensitive food systems in South Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 63-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:14:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12571-021-01244-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.