IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v12y2020i6d10.1007_s12571-020-01044-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-production decisions in agriculture: understanding postharvest storage and marketing decisions of smallholder farmers

Author

Listed:
  • Preeti Priya

    (Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA))

  • Suddhachit Mitra

    (Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA))

Abstract

This study uses the theory of reasoned action framework to explore smallholder farmers’ decisions surrounding grain storage and marketing in seven states of India. The study was conducted during one cropping season. It involved two interactions with the selected farmers: one household visit after sowing the crop and a telephone interview was held after harvesting the crop. The study seeks to understand the influence of different psycho-social factors on the decision of smallholder farmers to adopt storage as a strategic tool to increase their agricultural income from the same yield by leveraging price rises in markets during nonharvest months. Data were collected from 448 smallholder farmers from seven states in India to measure the constructs of attitudes, subjective norms, intention and action in the context of grain storage. Additionally, data on farmers’ progressiveness and innovativeness were collected in the study. The decision-model was calibrated using the structural equation modelling procedure. The multi-group analysis was carried out to estimate the moderation effect of farmers’ progressiveness and innovativeness in explaining their decision. The study establishes that attitudes and social norms around the deferment of postharvest sales are significant determinants of farmers’ intention to engage in grain storage. The progressiveness of a smallholder farmer accentuates the relationship between attitude and intention. There is evidence that the plan to store and market the produce at a later stage does not always convert into actual action. Farmers perceive storage as a risky business due to unpredictability around future prices. It is evident from the study that among positively predisposed smallholder farmers, innovative farmers with high risk-taking proclivities adopt storage as a strategic tool to increase their incomes more than their less innovative peers. The article discusses the policy implications of this study and suggests interventions that could facilitate the farmers to adopt storage as a measure to increase their agricultural income by taking advantage of price rises in markets during nonharvest months.

Suggested Citation

  • Preeti Priya & Suddhachit Mitra, 2020. "Post-production decisions in agriculture: understanding postharvest storage and marketing decisions of smallholder farmers," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1317-1329, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:12:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s12571-020-01044-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01044-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-020-01044-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-020-01044-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christiaensen,Luc & Kaminski,Jonathan & Christiaensen,Luc & Kaminski,Jonathan, 2014. "Post-harvest loss in Sub-Saharan Africa -- what do farmers say ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6831, The World Bank.
    2. Florkowski, Wojciech J. & Wu, Xi-Ling, 1990. "Simulating Impact Of Pecan Storage Technology On Farm Price And Growers' Income," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    4. Basavaraja, H. & Mahajanashetti, S.B. & Udagatti, Naveen C., 2007. "Economic Analysis of Post-harvest Losses in Food Grains in India: A Case Study of Karnataka," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 20(1).
    5. Greiner, Romy, 2015. "Motivations and attitudes influence farmers' willingness to participate in biodiversity conservation contracts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 154-165.
    6. Cavallo, Eugenio & Ferrari, Ester & Bollani, Luigi & Coccia, Mario, 2014. "Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-54.
    7. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1993. "A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation: The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 611-625, March.
    8. Minten, Bart & Reardon, Thomas & Singh, K.M. & Sutradhar, Rajib, 2012. "The New and Changing Roles of Cold Storages in the Potato Supply Chain in Bihar," MPRA Paper 61109, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2014.
    9. Lalani, Baqir & Dorward, Peter & Holloway, Garth & Wauters, Erwin, 2016. "Smallholder farmers' motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 80-90.
    10. Rehman, T. & McKemey, K. & Yates, C.M. & Cooke, R.J. & Garforth, C.J. & Tranter, R.B. & Park, J.R. & Dorward, P.T., 2007. "Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 281-293, May.
    11. Hyland, John J. & Heanue, Kevin & McKillop, Jessica & Micha, Evgenia, 2018. "Factors underlying farmers' intentions to adopt best practices: The case of paddock based grazing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 97-106.
    12. Florkowski, W. J. & Xi-Ling, Wu, 1990. "Simulating Impact of Pecan Storage Technology on Farm Price and Growers' Income," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 217-222, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoyu Sun & Xiaoli Yang & Ruilong Zhang, 2022. "The Determinants of Grape Storage: Evidence from Grape Growers in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Okunade, Albert A. & Cochran, Mark J., 1991. "Functional Forms and Farm-Level Demand for Pecans by Variety," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(2), pages 95-102, December.
    2. Li, Fuduo & Zhang, Kangjie & Ren, Jing & Yin, Changbin & Zhang, Yang & Nie, Jun, 2021. "Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: The case of rice-green manure crops rotation system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Hossein Nasiri Zarandi & Fereshteh Lotfizadeh, 2016. "The Influence of Cognitive Innovativeness on the Behavior and Style of Consumer Adoption: Implications for Electronic-Banking Service Adoption," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(5), pages 90-103, October.
    4. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.
    5. Kamara, Lamin Ibrahim & Dorward, Peter & Lalani, Baqir & Wauters, Erwin, 2019. "Unpacking the drivers behind the use of the Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) approach: The case of rice research and extension professionals in Sierra Leone," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Enoch Mutebi Kikulwe & Stanslus Okurut & Susan Ajambo & Kephas Nowakunda & Dietmar Stoian & Diego Naziri, 2018. "Postharvest Losses and their Determinants: A Challenge to Creating a Sustainable Cooking Banana Value Chain in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Daxini, Amar & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Buckley, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2018. "Factors influencing farmers' intentions to adopt nutrient management planning: accounting for heterogeneity," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276183, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    10. Marcati, Alberto & Guido, Gianluigi & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2008. "The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1579-1590, October.
    11. Chaboud, Géraldine & Moustier, Paule, 2021. "The role of diverse distribution channels in reducing food loss and waste: The case of the Cali tomato supply chain in Colombia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Truong, Yann & Klink, Richard R. & Simmons, Geoff & Grinstein, Amir & Palmer, Mark, 2017. "Branding strategies for high-technology products: The effects of consumer and product innovativeness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 85-91.
    13. Daxini, Amar & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Barnes, Andrew & Buckley, Cathal & Daly, Karen, 2018. "Which factors influence farmers’ intentions to adopt nutrient management planning?," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273494, Agricultural Economics Society.
    14. Daxini, Amar & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Barnes, Andrew & Buckley, Cathal & Daly, Karen, 2018. "Which factors influence farmers’ intentions to adopt nutrient management planning?," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273498, Agricultural Economics Society.
    15. Rodríguez-Barillas, María & Klerkx, Laurens & Poortvliet, P. Marijn, 2024. "What determines the acceptance of Climate Smart Technologies? The influence of farmers' behavioral drivers in connection with the policy environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2021. "Understanding cognitive and socio-psychological factors determining farmers’ intentions to use improved grassland: Implications of land use policy for sustainable pasture production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Xue Qu & Daizo Kojima & Laping Wu & Mitsuyoshi Ando, 2021. "The Losses in the Rice Harvest Process: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Vandecasteele, Bert & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 308-318.
    19. Yi Luo & Dong Huang & Xue Qu & Laping Wu, 2022. "An Inverse Relationship between Farm Size and Rice Harvest Loss: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    20. B. Vandecasteele & M. Geuens, 2008. "Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept and Measurement," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/532, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:12:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s12571-020-01044-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.