IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v162y2022i1d10.1007_s11205-021-02831-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory Budgeting as a Method for Improving Public Spaces in Major Polish Cities

Author

Listed:
  • A. Szczepańska

    (University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn)

  • M. Zagroba

    (University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn)

  • K. Pietrzyk

    (University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn)

Abstract

One of the forms of public participation in the local governance system is civic budgeting which actively engages residents in developing projects and voting on the submitted proposals. Civic budgeting aims to involve local communities in deciding how a defined portion of public resources should be allocated by means of a democratic debate. Public spaces are the essence of urban life; therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze civic budget records relating to public spaces. The study was conducted in the largest Polish cities. The research involved quantitative and comparative analytical methods. The analysis focused on community involvement and local community needs, represented by a wide array of public space-related project categories. The analyzed cities were ranked according to their civic engagement, and the resulting classification was compared with voter turnout during polls on the proposals adopted as part of the CB process. The results revealed considerable diversity in both civic engagement and local needs, and they could be used to develop guidelines for designing public spaces in the urban planning process. The present findings are also a valuable source of information for local governments in their efforts to improve the functioning, attractiveness and development of user-friendly spaces in citizen-oriented cities.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Szczepańska & M. Zagroba & K. Pietrzyk, 2022. "Participatory Budgeting as a Method for Improving Public Spaces in Major Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 231-252, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:162:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-021-02831-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-021-02831-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11205-021-02831-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-021-02831-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tommaso Rondinella & Elisabetta Segre & Duccio Zola, 2017. "Participative Processes for Measuring Progress: Deliberation, Consultation and the Role of Civil Society," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(3), pages 959-982, February.
    2. Walczak, Dariusz & Rutkowska, Aleksandra, 2017. "Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 706-714.
    3. Ernesto Ganuza & Héloïse Nez & Ernesto Morales, 2014. "The Struggle for a Voice: Tensions between Associations and Citizens in Participatory Budgeting," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2274-2291, November.
    4. Youngmin Oh & Seong-ho Jeong & Heontae Shin, 2019. "A Strategy for a Sustainable Local Government: Are Participatory Governments More Efficient, Effective, and Equitable in the Budget Process?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Gomez, J. & Insua, D. Rios & Alfaro, C., 2016. "A participatory budget model under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 351-358.
    6. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Sandra Svaljek & Ivana Rasic Bakaric & Marijana Sumpor, 2019. "Citizens and the city: the case for participatory budgeting in the City of Zagreb," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 43(1), pages 21-48.
    8. Evgenii Aleksandrov & Anatoli Bourmistrov & Giuseppe Grossi, 2018. "Participatory budgeting as a form of dialogic accounting in Russia," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 1098-1123, May.
    9. Terri Mannarini & Angela Fedi, 2018. "Using Quali-Quantitative Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Citizen Participation: A Study on Three Citizen Juries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 473-490, September.
    10. Gianpaolo Baiocchi & Ernesto Ganuza, 2014. "Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(1), pages 29-50, March.
    11. Seyed Hamid Mohammadi & Sharifah Norazizan & Hedayat Allah Nikkhah, 2018. "Conflicting perceptions on participation between citizens and members of local government," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1761-1778, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adamczyk Adam & Dawidowicz Dawid & Prokopiou Stella & Sirakoulis Kleanthis, 2024. "Determinants of the success of participatory budgets in Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 60(3), pages 199-210.
    2. Ryota Nakatani & Qianqian Zhang & Isaura Garcia Valdes, 2024. "Health Expenditure Decentralization and Health Outcomes: The Importance of Governance," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(1), pages 59-87.
    3. Marta Nalej & Elżbieta Lewandowicz, 2023. "An Analysis of Recreational and Leisure Areas in Polish Counties with the Use of Geographically Weighted Regression," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Kamil Banaszkiewicz & Iwona Pasiecznik & Wojciech Cieżak & Emilia den Boer, 2022. "Household E-Waste Management: A Case Study of Wroclaw, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Klimovský Daniel & Secinaro Silvana & Baláž Martina Benzoni & Brescia Valerio, 2024. "Participatory Budgeting as a Democratic and Managerial Innovation: Recent Trends and Avenues for Further Research," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 52-71.
    3. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Aubert, Alice H. & Lienert, Judit, 2024. "Operational Research for, with, and by citizens: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 800-814.
    5. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    6. Ali RezaHoseini & Zahra Rahmani & Morteza BagherPour, 2022. "Performance evaluation of sustainable projects: a possibilistic integrated novel analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis approach using Z-Number information," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3198-3257, March.
    7. Capaccioli, Andrea & Poderi, Giacomo & Bettega, Mela & D'Andrea, Vincenzo, 2017. "Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 621-630.
    8. Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Mladen Djuric & Jovan Filipovic & Stefan Komazec, 2020. "Reshaping the Future of Social Metrology: Utilizing Quality Indicators to Develop Complexity-Based Scientific Human and Social Capital Measurement Model," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 535-567, April.
    10. Laruelle, Annick, 2021. "Voting to select projects in participatory budgeting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 598-604.
    11. Francisco Bastida, 2023. "Political economics and citizens’ engagement in Croatia: a differential analysis," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 47(1), pages 41-70.
    12. Eva Tomaskova & Romana Buzkova, 2020. "Participatory Budgeting in Brno – Inspiration for Other Cities?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 758-770.
    13. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Iwona Cieślak, 2022. "The Use of Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) for Evaluating Public Participation on the Example of Rural Municipalities in the Region of Warmia and Mazury," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Anna Sołtysik-Piorunkiewicz & Iwona Zdonek, 2021. "How Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Ideas Shape the Open Data Performance Expectancy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Leonid Mylnikov & Rustam Fayzrakhmanov, 2018. "Production Planning with Parameters on the Basis of Dynamic Predictive Models: Interconnection and the Inertness of their Interaction," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 265-281.
    17. Leonid Mylnikov & Martin Kuetz, 2017. "The Risk Assessment Method in Prognostic Models of Production Systems Management with Account of the Time Factor," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 291-310.
    18. Julien Vrydagh, 2022. "Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 65-88, March.
    19. Berliner, Daniel, 2023. "Information Processing in Participatory Governance," SocArXiv snerh, Center for Open Science.
    20. Da Huang & Mei Han, 2021. "Research on Evaluation Method of Freight Transportation Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:162:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-021-02831-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.