IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v23y2022i2d10.1007_s10799-021-00344-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Yuan

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Weiling Song

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Technological innovation capability (TIC) refers to a fundamental ability owned by an organization to invest and reorganize production factors in technology innovation for gaining competitive advantages. It has attracted increasing attention to evaluate enterprises’ TIC in a competitive market. However, the existing methods have some limitations in the accuracy and efficiency of assessing TIC. This paper proposes a novel approach of evaluating enterprises’ TIC, which combines the entropy weight method and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) based on patent information. Entropy can determine the weights of indicators that help improve the rationality of the weighting. Besides, TOPSIS may reasonably rank the calculating results, which helps solve poor results in a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The paper takes seven enterprises in the solar cell technology field as samples to illustrate the proposed method. The results show that the Entropy-TOPSIS method can effectively evaluate enterprises’ TIC and is more suitable for small samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:23:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10799-021-00344-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-021-00344-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-021-00344-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-021-00344-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuo, Ting, 2017. "A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 152-160.
    2. Ernst, Holger & Omland, Nils, 2011. "The Patent Asset Index - A new approach to benchmark patent portfolios," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 34-41, March.
    3. Guan, Jian Cheng & Yam, Richard C.M. & Mok, Chiu Kam & Ma, Ning, 2006. "A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 971-986, May.
    4. Ernst, Holger, 2001. "Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 143-157, January.
    5. Abteen Ijadi Maghsoodi & Gelayol Abouhamzeh & Mohammad Khalilzadeh & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2018. "Ranking and selecting the best performance appraisal method using the MULTIMOORA approach integrated Shannon’s entropy," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Yuan, Xiaodong & Li, Xiaotao, 2021. "Mapping the technology diffusion of battery electric vehicle based on patent analysis: A perspective of global innovation systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Hong-Hua Qiu & Jing Yang, 2018. "An Assessment of Technological Innovation Capabilities of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Based on Patent Analysis: A Comparative Study between China and the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Dang, Jianwei & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2015. "Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 137-155.
    9. Cheng, Cong & Yang, Monica, 2017. "Enhancing performance of cross-border mergers and acquisitions in developed markets: The role of business ties and technological innovation capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 107-117.
    10. Walczak, Dariusz & Rutkowska, Aleksandra, 2017. "Project rankings for participatory budget based on the fuzzy TOPSIS method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 706-714.
    11. Amit Kumar Gupta & Narain Gupta, 2019. "Innovation and Culture as a Dynamic Capability for Firm Performance: A Study from Emerging Markets," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 323-336, December.
    12. Kroll, Henning, 2011. "Exploring the validity of patent applications as an indicator of Chinese competitiveness and market structure," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 23-33, March.
    13. Zhang, Lingxian & Wang, Jieqiong & Wen, Haojie & Fu, Zetian & Li, Xinxing, 2016. "Operating performance, industry agglomeration and its spatial characteristics of Chinese photovoltaic industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 373-386.
    14. Yuan, Xiaodong & Li, Xiaotao, 2020. "A network analytic method for measuring patent thickets: A case of FCEV technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Ferreira, Paulo Jorge Silveira & Dionísio, Andreia Teixeira Marques, 2016. "What are the conditions for good innovation results? A fuzzy-set approach for European Union," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5396-5400.
    16. Zoltan J. Acs & Luc Anselin & Attila Varga, 2008. "Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 11, pages 135-151, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Sterzi, Valerio, 2013. "Patent quality and ownership: An analysis of UK faculty patenting," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 564-576.
    18. Wang, Wensheng & Zhang, Chengyi, 2018. "Evaluation of relative technological innovation capability: Model and case study for China's coal mine," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 144-149.
    19. Jun, Seung-Pyo & Yeom, Jaeho & Son, Jong-Ku, 2014. "A study of the method using search traffic to analyze new technology adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 82-95.
    20. Chen, Yunwei & Yang, Zhiping & Shu, Fang & Hu, Zhengyin & Meyer, Martin & Bhattacharya, Sujit, 2009. "A patent based evaluation of technological innovation capability in eight economic regions in PR China," World Patent Information, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 104-110, June.
    21. Ger Devlin & Radomír Klvač, 2014. "How Technology Can Improve the Efficiency of Excavator-Based Cable Harvesting for Potential Biomass Extraction—A Woody Productivity Resource and Cost Analysis for Ireland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    22. Lee, Changyong & Kwon, Ohjin & Kim, Myeongjung & Kwon, Daeil, 2018. "Early identification of emerging technologies: A machine learning approach using multiple patent indicators," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 291-303.
    23. Yuan, Xiaodong & Cai, Yuchen, 2021. "Forecasting the development trend of low emission vehicle technologies: Based on patent data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    24. Yam, Richard C. M. & Guan, Jian Cheng & Pun, Kit Fai & Tang, Esther P. Y., 2004. "An audit of technological innovation capabilities in chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1123-1140, October.
    25. Anne Duchêne & Debapriya Sen & Konstantinos Serfes, 2015. "Patent Licensing and Entry Deterrence: The Role of Low Royalties," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 82, pages 1324-1348, December.
    26. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2014. "Environmental assessment for corporate sustainability by resource utilization and technology innovation: DEA radial measurement on Japanese industrial sectors," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 295-307.
    27. Inchae Park & Keeeun Lee & Byungun Yoon, 2015. "Exploring Promising Research Frontiers Based on Knowledge Maps in the Solar Cell Technology Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-30, October.
    28. Iain M. Cockburn & Megan J. MacGarvie, 2011. "Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 915-933, May.
    29. Loet Leydesdorff & Floortje Alkemade & Gaston Heimeriks & Rinke Hoekstra, 2015. "Patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics: geographic and technological perspectives on “photovoltaic cells”," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 629-651, January.
    30. Huang, Wencheng & Shuai, Bin & Sun, Yan & Wang, Yang & Antwi, Eric, 2018. "Using entropy-TOPSIS method to evaluate urban rail transit system operation performance: The China case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 292-303.
    31. Huang, Chi-Cheng & Chu, Pin-Yu & Chiang, Yu-Hsiu, 2008. "A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1038-1052, December.
    32. Kuei-Kuei Lai & Chien-Yu Lin & Yu-Hsin Chang & Ming-Chung Yang & Wen-Goang Yang, 2017. "A structured approach to explore technological competencies through R&D portfolio of photovoltaic companies by patent statistics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1327-1351, June.
    33. Fischer, Timo & Leidinger, Jan, 2014. "Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value—An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 519-529.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Jiaxin & Yang, Yanli & Qi, Peng & Zhang, Guangxin & Wu, Yao, 2024. "Development and application of a new water-carbon-economy coupling model (WCECM) for optimal allocation of agricultural water and land resources," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    2. Yunbo Liu & Wanjiang Wang & Yumeng Huang, 2024. "Prediction and Optimization Analysis of the Performance of an Office Building in an Extremely Hot and Cold Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-40, May.
    3. Yunbo Liu & Wanjiang Wang & Yumeng Huang & Junkang Song & Zhenan Zhou, 2024. "Energy Performance Analysis and Study of an Office Building in an Extremely Hot and Cold Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiaotao & Yuan, Xiaodong, 2022. "Tracing the technology transfer of battery electric vehicles in China: A patent citation organization network analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    2. Dziallas, Marisa & Blind, Knut, 2019. "Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 3-29.
    3. Carsten C. Guderian, 2019. "Identifying Emerging Technologies with Smart Patent Indicators: The Example of Smart Houses," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Jiri Schwarz & Martin Stepanek, 2016. "Patents: A Means to Innovation or Strategic Ends?," Working Papers IES 2016/08, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Apr 2016.
    5. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Kenneth Zahringer & Christos Kolympiris & Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes, 2017. "Academic knowledge quality differentials and the quality of firm innovation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 26(5), pages 821-844.
    7. Christos Kolympiris & Sebastian Hoenen & Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes, 2018. "Geographic distance between venture capitalists and target firms and the value of quality signals," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 189-220.
    8. Ali RezaHoseini & Zahra Rahmani & Morteza BagherPour, 2022. "Performance evaluation of sustainable projects: a possibilistic integrated novel analytic hierarchy process-data envelopment analysis approach using Z-Number information," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3198-3257, March.
    9. Julia Cohen & Carina Marques & Joana Lameira & Maria José Sousa & Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira, 2020. "The Interrelationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Innovation In Aveiro-based Startups," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 11(3), pages 65-86, December.
    10. Tobias Schlegel & Curdin Pfister & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2022. "Tertiary education expansion and regional firm development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(11), pages 1874-1887, November.
    11. Selma Regina Martins Oliveira & Roberto Sbragia, 2015. "Modelling to assess the impact of technological innovation capacity in the performance of high complexity environments," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 12-35.
    12. Lau, Antonio K.W. & Lo, William, 2015. "Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 99-114.
    13. Christodoulou, Demetris & Lev, Baruch & Ma, Le, 2018. "The productivity of Chinese patents: The role of business area and ownership type," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 107-124.
    14. Wang, Fang, 2024. "Does the recombination of distant scientific knowledge generate valuable inventions? An analysis of pharmaceutical patents," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Briggs, Kristie, 2015. "Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1566-1573.
    16. Yutao Sun & Chen Zhang & Robert A. W. Kok, 2020. "The role of research outcome quality in the relationship between university research collaboration and technology transfer: empirical results from China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(2), pages 1003-1026, February.
    17. Timothy F. Slaper & Nicholas R. Hart & Tanya J. Hall & Michael F. Thompson, 2011. "The Index of Innovation: A New Tool for Regional Analysis," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 25(1), pages 36-53, February.
    18. Sinigaglia, Tiago & Eduardo Santos Martins, Mario & Cezar Mairesse Siluk, Julio, 2022. "Technological evolution of internal combustion engine vehicle: A patent data analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    19. Yao, Li & Li, Jun & Li, Jian, 2020. "Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Guderian, Carsten C. & Posth, Jan-Alexander & Grob, Linus, 2023. "Investment decisions and passive portfolio construction utilizing patent analytics: A multi-case study on COVID-19 treatment technologies," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 66-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:23:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10799-021-00344-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.