IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v64y2012i4d10.1007_bf03373698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Präferenzen für Pay-As-You-Drive-Versicherungsmerkmale bei Privatkunden — Eine conjoint-analytische Untersuchung —

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten J. Gerpott

    (Schwerpunkt Telekommunikationswirtschaft, Mercator School of Management, Universität Duisburg-Essen)

  • Sabrina Berg

    (Schwerpunkt Telekommunikationswirtschaft, Mercator School of Management, Universität Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Pay-As-You-Drive-(PAYD-)Versicherungen beinhalten die Erfassung, Auswertung und oft über Mobilfunknetze realisierte Übertragung von Fahrdaten für Personenkraftwagen (Pkw), um so das fahrzeugspezifische Unfallrisiko in die Kalkulation von Pkw-Haftpflichtversicherungspreisen einfließen zu lassen. Die PAYD-Grundidee wird zwar seit langem in Wissenschaft und Praxis diskutiert. Dennoch sind Ausführungen zur Gestaltung von PAYD-Angebotsmerkmalen in einer Weise, die deren Nachfragewahrscheinlichkeit bei privaten Versicherungsnehmern (VN) fördert, zumeist vage und ohne empirische Basis. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde deshalb eine Online-Befragung von 517 Pkw-Fahrern in Deutschland durchgeführt, um mit Hilfe der Methode der Limit-Conjoint-Analyse (CA) den Nutzen zu quantifizieren, den VN vier PAYD-Gestaltungsmerkmalen mit insgesamt elf Ausprägungen zuschreiben. A ls Gestaltungsmerkmale wurden (1) Bezugsgrößen der Prämienbestimmung, (2) die Art der Fahrdatenübermittlung, (3) die Bündelung von PAYD-Versicherungen mit telematischen Zusatzleistungen und (4) die mögliche Ersparnis gegenüber dem aktuellen Preis der eigenen herkömmlichen Pkw-Versicherung kombiniert. Die mit Abstand stärksten Wirkungen auf die PAYD-Nachfragebereitschaft hatte die Höhe der Prämienersparnis gefolgt von der Verknüpfung von PAYD mit Pkw-bezogenen Zusatzleistungen. Im Gesamtsample präferierten die Teilnehmer im Durchschnitt am stärksten (wenigsten) PAYD-Angebote mit 50% (10%) möglicher Ersparnis, automatischem Notruf bei Unfällen (ohne Zusatzleistungen), Fahrdatenübermittlung am Ende einer Abrechnungsperiode (kontinuierlicher Datenübermittlung während jeder Fahrt) und mit zwei (drei) Prämienbezugsgrößen. Die Befragten konnten drei PAYD-Präferenzsegmenten zugeordnet werden, die sich nicht sehr stark im Hinblick auf ihr sozio-demographisches Profil sowie ihr Fahr- und Versicherungsverhalten unterscheiden. Für Erstversicherer legen die Befunde nahe, PAYD-Angebote zumindest in einer Startphase auf das Segment der VN auszurichten, das an einer automatischen Notruffunktion in ihrem Pkw interessiert ist und PAYD als „Abrundung“ auch nutzen würde, wenn eine Prämienersparnis von nicht mehr als 30% erzielt werden kann.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten J. Gerpott & Sabrina Berg, 2012. "Präferenzen für Pay-As-You-Drive-Versicherungsmerkmale bei Privatkunden — Eine conjoint-analytische Untersuchung —," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 456-492, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373698
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03373698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03373698
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03373698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laibson, David & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1998. "Amos Tversky and the Ascent of Behavioral Economics," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 7-47, April.
    2. Green, Paul E & Srinivasan, V, 1978. "Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 5(2), pages 103-123, Se.
    3. Frank Kohne & Carsten Totz & Kai Wehmeyer, 2005. "Consumer preferences for location-based service attributes: a conjoint analysis," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 16-32.
    4. Heng Xu, 2009. "Consumer Responses to the Introduction of Privacy Protection Measures: An Exploratory Research Framework," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 21-47, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikou, Shahrokh & Bouwman, Harry, 2012. "Mobile service platform competition," 19th ITS Biennial Conference, Bangkok 2012: Moving Forward with Future Technologies - Opening a Platform for All 72515, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Winfried Steiner & Harald Hruschka, 2002. "A Probabilistic One-Step Approach to the Optimal Product Line Design Problem Using Conjoint and Cost Data," Review of Marketing Science Working Papers 1-4-1003, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    3. Merja Halme & Kari Linden & Kimmo Kääriä, 2009. "Patients’ Preferences for Generic and Branded Over-the-Counter Medicines," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 2(4), pages 243-255, December.
    4. Dufhues, T. & Buchenrieder, G., 2004. "Der Beitrag der Conjoint Analyse zur nachfrageorintierten Entwicklung des ländlichen Finanzsektors in Vietnam," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 39.
    5. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. James Agarwal & Wayne DeSarbo & Naresh K. Malhotra & Vithala Rao, 2015. "An Interdisciplinary Review of Research in Conjoint Analysis: Recent Developments and Directions for Future Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(1), pages 19-40, March.
    7. Mahesh Balan U & Saji K. Mathew, 2021. "Personalize, Summarize or Let them Read? A Study on Online Word of Mouth Strategies and Consumer Decision Process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 627-647, June.
    8. Shin, Jungwoo & Hwang, Won-Sik, 2017. "Consumer preference and willingness to pay for a renewable fuel standard (RFS) policy: Focusing on ex-ante market analysis and segmentation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 32-40.
    9. Haaijer, Marinus E., 1996. "Predictions in conjoint choice experiments : the x-factor probit model," Research Report 96B22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Ha, Jinkyung, 2018. "Consumer valuation of Fintech: The case of Mobile Payment in Korea," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190341, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. P. A. Ferrari & S. Salini, 2008. "Measuring Service Quality: The Opinion of Europeans about Utilities," Working Papers 2008.36, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Steinhorst, M.P. & Bahrs, E., 2013. "Renditansprüche im Kontext gleichmäßiger Rückflüsse – Ergebnisse eines Experiments mit Stakeholdern des Agribusiness," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    13. Yavuz Taşcıoğlu & Mevlüt Gül & Metin Göksel Akpınar & Bahri Karlı & Bektaş Kadakoğlu & Bekir Sıtkı Şirikçi & Musa Acar & Hilal Yılmaz, 2023. "Optimum Support Policy Component for the Development of Agricultural Production: Potato Producer," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Luisa Menapace & Gregory Colson & Carola Grebitus & Maria Facendola, 2011. "Consumers' preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(2), pages 193-212, June.
    15. Srinivasan, V. Seenu & Netzer, Oded, 2007. "Adaptive Self-Explication of Multi-attribute Preferences," Research Papers 1979, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    16. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    17. Xue, Hong & Mainville, Denise Y. & You, Wen & Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr., 2009. "Nutrition Knowledge, Sensory Characteristics and Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pasture-Fed Beef," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49277, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Barbara Baarsma, 2003. "The Valuation of the IJmeer Nature Reserve using Conjoint Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(3), pages 343-356, July.
    19. Krug, B. & Hendrischke, H., 2006. "Framing China: Transformation and Institutional Change," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-025-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Robert S. Wigton & Vincent L. Hoellerich & Kashinath D. Patil, 1986. "How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 6(1), pages 2-11, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    L86; L96; M31;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:64:y:2012:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03373698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.