IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v90y2012i2d10.1007_s11192-011-0524-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the authority of free online scholarly information

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanfu Chen

    (Wuhan University)

  • Yuan Yu

    (Wuhan University)

  • Qiong Tang

    (Sun Yat-sen University)

  • Kuei Chiu

    (University of California)

  • Yan Rao

    (Wuhan University)

  • Xuan Huang

    (Shenzhen Institute of Standards and Technology)

  • Kai Sun

    (Wuhan University)

Abstract

Authority generally relates to expertise, recognition of official status of a source, and the reputation of the author and publisher. As the Internet has become a ubiquitous tool in modern science and scholarly research, evaluating the authority of free online scholarly information is becoming crucial. However, few empirical studies have focused on this issue. Using a modified version of Jim Kapoun’s “Five criteria for evaluating web pages” as framework, this research selected 32 keywords from eight disciplines, inputted them into three search engines (Google, Yahoo and AltaVista) and used Analytic Hierarchy Process to determine the weights. The first batches of results (web pages) from keyword searching were selected as evaluation samples (in the two search phases, the first 50 and 10 results were chosen, respectively), and a total of 3,134 samples were evaluated for authority based on the evaluation framework. The results show that the average authority value for free online scholarly information is about 3.63 (out of five), which is in the “fair” level (3 ≤ Z

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanfu Chen & Yuan Yu & Qiong Tang & Kuei Chiu & Yan Rao & Xuan Huang & Kai Sun, 2012. "Assessing the authority of free online scholarly information," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 90(2), pages 543-560, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:90:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0524-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0524-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-011-0524-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-011-0524-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soo Young Rieh, 2002. "Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(2), pages 145-161.
    2. John W. Fritch & Robert L. Cromwell, 2001. "Evaluating Internet resources: Identity, affiliation, and cognitive authority in a networked world," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(6), pages 499-507.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Kim, Jooyoung & Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace) & Kwon, Eun Sook & Reid, Leonard N., 2017. "TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-76.
    3. Xiuping Zhang & Jaewon Choi, 2022. "The Importance of Social Influencer-Generated Contents for User Cognition and Emotional Attachment: An Information Relevance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.
    5. Afiq Izzudin A. Rahim & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Faizul Nizam A. Salim & Mohd Ariff Ikram Ariffin, 2019. "Health Information Engagement Factors in Malaysia: A Content Analysis of Facebook Use by the Ministry of Health in 2016 and 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Yiwei Wang & Chirag Shah, 2022. "Authentic versus synthetic: An investigation of the influences of study settings and task configurations on search behaviors," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(3), pages 362-375, March.
    7. Atma Citalada & Atim Djazuli & Sri Palupi Prabandari, 2022. "The effect of advertising relevance on avoidance with advertising engagement: Perceived intrusiveness as mediation variable," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(3), pages 44-50, April.
    8. Rajni Mala & Parmod Chand, 2015. "Judgment and Decision‐Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-50, March.
    9. López-Fernández, Begoña & Perrigot, Rozenn, 2018. "Using Websites to Recruit Franchisee Candidates," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 80-94.
    10. Yan Chen & Grace Jeon & Yong-Mi Kim, 2014. "A day without a search engine: an experimental study of online and offline searches," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 512-536, December.
    11. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    12. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    13. Devan Ray Donaldson & Colin Bradley LeFevre, 2022. "Records, trust, and misinformation: Using birtherism to understand the influence of conspiracy theories on human information interactions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1579-1593, November.
    14. Yuwei Yan & Zhihan Lv & Bin Hu, 2018. "Building investor trust in the P2P lending platform with a focus on Chinese P2P lending platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 203-224, June.
    15. Simona VINEREAN, 2017. "Content Marketing Strategy. Definition, Objectives and Tactics," Expert Journal of Marketing, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(2), pages 92-98.
    16. Marta Miszczak, 2020. "Weryfikacja Wiarygodności Informacji Zamieszczonej W Internecie – Pragmatyka Istotna Dla Zachowania Bezpieczeństwa Na Poziomie Jednostki," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 3, pages 51-61.
    17. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Fadhilah Mat Yamin & T. Ramayah, 2011. "The Impact of User Knowledge on Web Search Satisfaction," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 139-145, January.
    19. Annaluce Latorre & Maria Vernuccio, 2013. "Ridurre il rischio percepito e generare fiducia nello shopping online attraverso gli User Generated Content," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 143-163.
    20. Hervé Stolowy & Yves Gendron & Jodie Moll & Luc Paugam, 2019. "Building the Legitimacy of Whistleblowers: A Multi‐Case Discourse Analysis," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 7-49, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:90:y:2012:i:2:d:10.1007_s11192-011-0524-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.