IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v73y2022i11p1579-1593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Records, trust, and misinformation: Using birtherism to understand the influence of conspiracy theories on human information interactions

Author

Listed:
  • Devan Ray Donaldson
  • Colin Bradley LeFevre

Abstract

Records are persistent representations of activities created by partakers, observers, or their authorized proxies. People are generally willing to trust vital records such as birth, death, and marriage certificates. However, conspiracy theories and other misinformation may negatively impact perceptions of such documents, particularly when they are associated with a significant person or event. This paper explores the relationship between archival records and trustworthiness by reporting results of a survey that asked genealogists about their perceptions of 44th U.S. President Barack Obama's birth certificate, which was then at the center of the “birtherism” conspiracy. We found that although most participants perceived the birth certificate as trustworthy, others engaged in a biased review, considering it not trustworthy because of the news and politics surrounding it. These findings suggest that a conspiracy theory can act as a moderating variable that undermines the efficacy of normal or recommended practices and procedures for evaluating online information such as birth certificates. We provide recommendations and propose strategies for archivists to disseminate correct information to counteract the spread of misinformation about the authenticity of vital records, and we discuss future directions for research.

Suggested Citation

  • Devan Ray Donaldson & Colin Bradley LeFevre, 2022. "Records, trust, and misinformation: Using birtherism to understand the influence of conspiracy theories on human information interactions," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1579-1593, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:11:p:1579-1593
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24697
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soo Young Rieh, 2002. "Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(2), pages 145-161.
    2. Miriam J. Metzger, 2007. "Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(13), pages 2078-2091, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devan Ray Donaldson & Paul Conway, 2015. "User conceptions of trustworthiness for digital archival documents," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2427-2444, December.
    2. Payal S. Kapoor & K.R. Jayasimha & Ashish Sadh, 2013. "Brand-related, Consumer to Consumer, Communication via Social Media," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 43-59, January.
    3. G. Rejikumar & Aswathy Asokan-Ajitha & Sofi Dinesh & Ajay Jose, 2022. "The role of cognitive complexity and risk aversion in online herd behavior," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 585-621, June.
    4. Sharma, Mahak & Antony, Rose & Sehrawat, Rajat & Cruz, Angel Contreras & Daim, Tugrul U., 2022. "Exploring post-adoption behaviors of e-service users: Evidence from the hospitality sector /online travel services," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    5. Lanfei Shi & Siva Viswanathan, 2023. "Optional Verification and Signaling in Online Matching Markets: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1603-1621, December.
    6. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    7. Kristine L. Nowak & Rory McGloin, 2014. "The Influence of Peer Reviews on Source Credibility and Purchase Intention," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Yan Chen & Grace Jeon & Yong-Mi Kim, 2014. "A day without a search engine: an experimental study of online and offline searches," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 512-536, December.
    9. Fons Wijnhoven, 2012. "The Hegelian inquiring system and a critical triangulation tool for the Internet information slave: A design science study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(6), pages 1168-1182, June.
    10. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi, 2019. "Chat now… Examining the variables influencing the use of online live chat," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 55-67.
    11. Kim, Jooyoung & Ahn, Sun Joo (Grace) & Kwon, Eun Sook & Reid, Leonard N., 2017. "TV advertising engagement as a state of immersion and presence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 67-76.
    12. Udalov, Vladimir & Welfens, Paul J. J., 2017. "Digital and Competing Information Sources: Impact on Environmental Concern and Prospects for Cooperation," IZA Discussion Papers 10684, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Sheng Tun Li & Thuong Thi Pham & Hui Chi Chuang & Zhi-Wei Wang, 2016. "Does reliable information matter? Towards a trustworthy co-created recommendation model by mining unboxing reviews," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 71-99, February.
    14. Jost, Peter J. & Pünder, Johanna & Schulze-Lohoff, Isabell, 2020. "Fake news - Does perception matter more than the truth?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Min Sook Park & JungHo Park & Hyejin Kim & Jin Hui Lee & Hyejin Park, 2023. "Measuring the impacts of quantity and trustworthiness of information on COVID‐19 vaccination intent," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(7), pages 846-865, July.
    16. Xiuping Zhang & Jaewon Choi, 2022. "The Importance of Social Influencer-Generated Contents for User Cognition and Emotional Attachment: An Information Relevance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Stephanie Watts & Laurie Giddens, 2017. "Credibility assessment for sustainable consumption: A laboratory study," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1356608-135, January.
    18. Yen-Liang Chen & Chia-Ling Chang & An-Qiao Sung, 2021. "Predicting eWOM’s Influence on Purchase Intention Based on Helpfulness, Credibility, Information Quality and Professionalism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Cherley C. Du Plessis, 2023. "The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:73:y:2022:i:11:p:1579-1593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.