IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v126y2021i5d10.1007_s11192-021-03933-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing knowledge entities about COVID-19 using entitymetrics

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Yu

    (Shanxi Medical University
    Shanxi Medical University)

  • Qi Wang

    (Shanxi Medical University
    Key Laboratory of Cellular Physiology (Shanxi Medical University), Ministry of Education)

  • Yafei Zhang

    (Shanxi Medical University)

  • Chongyan Chen

    (University of Texas)

  • Hyeyoung Ryu

    (University of Washington)

  • Namu Park

    (Yonsei University)

  • Jae-Eun Baek

    (Dae-Gu University)

  • Keyuan Li

    (Indiana University)

  • Yifei Wu

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Daifeng Li

    (Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Jian Xu

    (Sun Yat-Sen University)

  • Meijun Liu

    (Fudan University
    Fudan University)

  • Jeremy J. Yang

    (University of New Mexico)

  • Chenwei Zhang

    (the University of Hong Kong)

  • Chao Lu

    (Hohai University)

  • Peng Zhang

    (Tsinghua University)

  • Xin Li

    (Wuhan University)

  • Baitong Chen

    (Shanghai University)

  • Islam Akef Ebeid

    (University of Texas)

  • Julia Fensel

    (Westlake High School)

  • Chao Min

    (Nanjing University)

  • Yujia Zhai

    (Wuhan University
    Tianjin Normal University)

  • Min Song

    (Yonsei University)

  • Ying Ding

    (University of Texas
    University of Texas)

  • Yi Bu

    (Peking University)

Abstract

COVID-19 cases have surpassed the 109 + million markers, with deaths tallying up to 2.4 million. Tens of thousands of papers regarding COVID-19 have been published along with countless bibliometric analyses done on COVID-19 literature. Despite this, none of the analyses have focused on domain entities occurring in scientific publications. However, analysis of these bio-entities and the relations among them, a strategy called entity metrics, could offer more insights into knowledge usage and diffusion in specific cases. Thus, this paper presents an entitymetric analysis on COVID-19 literature. We construct an entity–entity co-occurrence network and employ network indicators to analyze the extracted entities. We find that ACE-2 and C-reactive protein are two very important genes and that lopinavir and ritonavir are two very important chemicals, regardless of the results from either ranking.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Yu & Qi Wang & Yafei Zhang & Chongyan Chen & Hyeyoung Ryu & Namu Park & Jae-Eun Baek & Keyuan Li & Yifei Wu & Daifeng Li & Jian Xu & Meijun Liu & Jeremy J. Yang & Chenwei Zhang & Chao Lu & Peng Zha, 2021. "Analyzing knowledge entities about COVID-19 using entitymetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4491-4509, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03933-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-03933-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-021-03933-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-021-03933-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle R. Myers & Wei Yang Tham & Yian Yin & Nina Cohodes & Jerry G. Thursby & Marie C. Thursby & Peter Schiffer & Joseph T. Walsh & Karim R. Lakhani & Dashun Wang, 2020. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(9), pages 880-883, September.
    2. Noriko Amano-Patiño & Elisa Faraglia & Chryssi Giannitsarou & Zeina Hasna, 2020. "Who is doing new research in the time of COVID-19? Not the female economists," Vox eBook Chapters, in: Sebastian Galliani & Ugo Panizza (ed.), Publishing and Measuring Success in Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 1, pages 137-142, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Keeheon Lee & SuYeon Kim & Erin Hea-Jin Kim & Min Song, 2017. "Comparative evaluation of bibliometric content networks by tomographic content analysis: An application to Parkinson's disease," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(5), pages 1295-1307, May.
    4. Min Song & Nam-Gi Han & Yong-Hwan Kim & Ying Ding & Tamy Chambers, 2013. "Discovering Implicit Entity Relation with the Gene-Citation-Gene Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong, Ke & Wu, Jiang & Wang, Kaili, 2021. "On the inequality of citation counts of all publications of individual authors," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    2. Li, Xin & Tang, Xuli & Cheng, Qikai, 2022. "Predicting the clinical citation count of biomedical papers using multilayer perceptron neural network," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    3. Shiyun Wang & Jin Mao & Yujie Cao & Gang Li, 2022. "Integrated knowledge content in an interdisciplinary field: identification, classification, and application," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6581-6614, November.
    4. Li, Xin & Tang, Xuli, 2021. "Characterizing interdisciplinarity in drug research: A translational science perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin Bürgi & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2022. "The influence of Covid-19 on publications in economics: bibliometric evidence from five working paper series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5175-5189, September.
    2. Liu, Meijun & Zhang, Ning & Hu, Xiao & Jaiswal, Ajay & Xu, Jian & Chen, Hong & Ding, Ying & Bu, Yi, 2022. "Further divided gender gaps in research productivity and collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from coronavirus-related literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    3. Pınar E. Dönmez, 2022. "The COVID-19 Pandemic, Academia, Gender, and Beyond: A Review," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Walters, Cyrill & Mehl, Graeme G. & Piraino, Patrizio & Jansen, Jonathan D. & Kriger, Samantha, 2022. "The impact of the pandemic-enforced lockdown on the scholarly productivity of women academics in South Africa," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    5. Magdalena Gil & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Máximo Quiero-Bastías & Marigen Narea & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, 2023. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on researchers: evidence from Chile and Colombia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Wenxuan Shi & Renli Wu, 2024. "Women’s strength in science: exploring the influence of female participation on research impact and innovation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4529-4551, July.
    7. Sarah Shandera & Jes L Matsick & David R Hunter & Louis Leblond, 2021. "RASE: Modeling cumulative disadvantage due to marginalized group status in academia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Ewa Małgorzata Szepietowska & Ewa Zawadzka & Sara Filipiak, 2022. "Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the Sense of Gains and Losses during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Ourania Tzoraki & Svetlana Dimitrova & Marin Barzakov & Saad Yaseen & Vasilis Gavalas & Hani Harb & Abas Haidari & Brian P. Cahill & Alexandra Ćulibrk & Ekaterini Nikolarea & Eleni Andrianopulu & Miro, 2021. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Working Conditions, Employment, Career Development and Well-Being of Refugee Researchers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Duede, Eamon & Teplitskiy, Misha & Lakhani, Karim & Evans, James, 2024. "Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    11. Timothy P. Johnson & Mary K. Feeney & Heyjie Jung & Ashlee Frandell & Mattia Caldarulo & Lesley Michalegko & Shaika Islam & Eric W. Welch, 2021. "COVID-19 and the academy: opinions and experiences of university-based scientists in the U.S," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, December.
    12. Adriana Báez & Muhammed Y. Idris & Kimberly Lawson & Mohamed Mubasher & Yulia Strekalova & Keith Green & Priscilla Pemu & Jonathan K. Stiles & Martiza Salazar & Alexander Quarshie & Lee S. Caplan & Er, 2023. "Impact of COVID-19 on the Research Career Advancement of Health Equity Scholars from Diverse Backgrounds," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Tehmina Khan & Pavithra Siriwardhane, 2021. "Barriers to Career Progression in the Higher Education Sector: Perceptions of Australian Academics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Ruomeng Cui & Hao Ding & Feng Zhu, 2020. "Gender Inequality in Research Productivity During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Papers 2006.10194, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    15. Marta Peña & Noelia Olmedo-Torre & Olga Alcaraz & Juan A. Chavez-Dominguez & José López & Luis Eduardo Mujica, 2022. "Impact of the Pandemic on the Teaching and Research Staff at a Technological University in Spain: Deepening the Gender Gap," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Kyle R. Myers, 2022. "Some Tradeoffs of Competition in Grant Contests," Papers 2207.02379, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    17. Jessica Weinkle, 2022. "An evaluation of North Carolina science advice on COVID-19 pandemic response," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Choudhury, Nazim & Faisal, Fahim & Khushi, Matloob, 2020. "Mining Temporal Evolution of Knowledge Graphs and Genealogical Features for Literature-based Discovery Prediction," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    19. Robinson W Fulweiler & Sarah W Davies & Jennifer F Biddle & Amy J Burgin & Emily H G Cooperdock & Torrance C Hanley & Carly D Kenkel & Amy M Marcarelli & Catherine M Matassa & Talea L Mayo & Lory Z Sa, 2021. "Rebuild the Academy: Supporting academic mothers during COVID-19 and beyond," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, March.
    20. Jeong, Yoo Kyung & Xie, Qing & Yan, Erjia & Song, Min, 2020. "Examining drug and side effect relation using author–entity pair bipartite networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:126:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-021-03933-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.