IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i5d10.1007_s11135-021-01277-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phenomena-centered Text Analysis (PTA): a new approach to foster the qualitative paradigm in text analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Krikser

    (University of Kassel)

  • Benedikt Jahnke

    (University of Kassel)

Abstract

Content or text analysis is one of the most common evaluation methods employed in qualitative research. Despite its wide application, however, a clear structure of how such evaluation should be conducted is often lacking due to the complexity of qualitative data. As a consequence, highly differentiated category systems with small-step subdivisions of categories and sub-categories are often used, leading to a loss of context both among categories and for the content as a whole. The aim of this paper is to describe the Phenomena-centered Text Analysis (PTA) as a novel form of qualitative text analysis, which takes these shortcomings into account by focusing on text-inherent phenomena. These phenomena are identified in two preceding quantitative analysis steps that identifying overlapping coding for subsequently qualitative analysis. We explain the structured code- and context-based approach of this new method and demonstrate its application with an empirical example. The PTA contributes to an increasing demand of qualitative methods especially for small-scale projects that need a structured kind of qualitative data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Krikser & Benedikt Jahnke, 2022. "Phenomena-centered Text Analysis (PTA): a new approach to foster the qualitative paradigm in text analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3539-3554, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01277-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01277-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01277-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01277-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenny Harrow & Tobias Jung, 2011. "Philanthropy is Dead; Long Live Philanthropy?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(8), pages 1047-1056, November.
    2. Gregory D. Saxton & Michelle A. Benson, 2005. "Social Capital and the Growth of the Nonprofit Sector," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(1), pages 16-35, March.
    3. Aaron Ahuvia, 2001. "Traditional, Interpretive, and Reception Based Content Analyses: Improving the Ability of Content Analysis to Address Issues of Pragmatic and Theoretical Concern," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 139-172, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natasja Steenkamp & Deryl Northcott, 2007. "Content Analysis in Accounting Research: the Practical Challenges," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(43), pages 12-25, November.
    2. María Josefina Peláez & Cristián Coo & Marisa Salanova, 2020. "Facilitating Work Engagement and Performance Through Strengths-Based Micro-coaching: A Controlled Trial Study," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1265-1284, April.
    3. Reis, Germano Glufke & Villar, Eduardo Guedes & Prado Gimenez, Fernando Antonio & Maiolino Molento, Carla Forte & Ferri, Priscila, 2022. "The interplay of entrepreneurial ecosystems and global value chains: Insights from the cultivated meat entrepreneurial ecosystem of Singapore," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. An, Yi & Davey, Howard & Eggleton, Ian R.C. & Wang, Zhuquan, 2015. "Intellectual capital disclosure and the information gap: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 179-187.
    5. Ana Sofia Brandão & José M. R. C. A. Santos, 2024. "Sustainability from Policy to Practice: Assessing the Impact of European Research and Innovation Frameworks on Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Yahui Song & Kegao Yan & Guozhang Yan, 2024. "Complementarity or Crowding Out: The Effects of Government-Led Philanthropic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Victor G. Hugg & Kelly LeRoux, 2019. "Personality traits as predictors of citizen engagement with local government," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(2).
    8. Andreas Hoffjan & Rouven Trapp & Christoph Endenich & Thomas Boucoiran, 2012. "International budgeting—challenges for German-French companies," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 5-25, September.
    9. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Wang, Jue & Liu, Xiaohui & Wei, Yingqi, 2021. "A co-evolution perspective of EMNE internationalization and institutions: An integrative framework of 5Cs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    10. Yiran Li & Yanto Chandra & Lin Nie & Yingying Fan, 2020. "From women for women: The role of social media in online nonprofit activities during Wuhan lockdown," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(5), pages 267-272, December.
    11. Zhiming Liu & Haiwei Jia, 2022. "What Drives the Development and Sustainable Growth of Cultural Nonprofits—Chinese Province-Level Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Chiara Carolina Donelli & Ruth Rentschler & Simone Fanelli & Boram Lee, 2023. "Philanthropy patterns in major Australian performing arts organizations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1367-1396, December.
    13. Ruth Puttick, 2023. "The Influence Of Philanthropic Foundations On City Government Innovation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 774-791, September.
    14. Kunal Y. Sevak & LaKami Baker, 2022. "Need‐resource indicators and nonprofit human services organization density," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 129-160, March.
    15. Barbieri, Carla & Henderson, Karla A. & Santos, Carla A., 2014. "Exploring memorable surfing trips," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 277-280.
    16. Kam Jugdev, 2012. "Learning from Lessons Learned: Project Management Research Program," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 4(1), pages 13-22, January.
    17. Aspen Lillywhite & Gregor Wolbring, 2020. "Coverage of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning within Academic Literature, Canadian Newspapers, and Twitter Tweets: The Case of Disabled People," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Shinwon Noh & Dongyoub Shin & Sunhyuk Kim, 2023. "Problemistic search and hybrid organizations: multiple sources of performance feedback in diversifications by corporate foundations in Korea," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 188-216, February.
    19. Håkan Nunstedt & Kerstin Nilsson & Ingela Skärsäter, 2014. "The portfolio method as management support for patients with major depression," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(11-12), pages 1639-1647, June.
    20. Scott Dell & Meena Subedi & Maxwell K. Hsu & Ali Farazmand, 2022. "Social Capital and Financial Performance in Nonprofits," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 193-210, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01277-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.