IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v56y2022i3d10.1007_s11135-021-01165-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life

Author

Listed:
  • Renaud Gaucher

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

  • Ruut Veenhoven

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    North-West University)

Abstract

There is a great demand for information on how workers evaluate the quality of their jobs. In response to this demand, a multitude of questionnaires has been developed, which are presented under different names and stress different aspects of work life. It is therefore difficult to see what questionnaire is best suited to one’s information demand. This problem can be solved by considering the content of the different questionnaires through the same conceptual lens, focussing on the meaning of each of the constituting questions separately. In this paper, we adapted Veenhoven’s conceptualization of qualities of life in general to the work setting, which gave us a matrix of 9 nested notions of perceived quality of a worker’s work life, and then used this matrix to classify the meaning addressed in 12 questionnaires. Some of these questionnaires appear to address a clear meaning, while others cover a mix of meanings. These contents are presented in a tabular overview here to allow users to select the questionnaire the most adapted to their needs. This approach can also be used to develop new questionnaires on perceived quality of work life.

Suggested Citation

  • Renaud Gaucher & Ruut Veenhoven, 2022. "What is in the name? Content analysis of questionnaires on perceived quality of one’s work life," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1045-1072, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01165-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01165-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-021-01165-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-021-01165-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilmar Schaufeli & Marisa Salanova & Vicente González-romá & Arnold Bakker, 2002. "The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 71-92, March.
    2. Jean-Pierre Martel & Gilles Dupuis, 2006. "Quality of Work Life: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, and Presentation of a New Model and Measuring Instrument," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 333-368, June.
    3. Sanjay Singh & Yogita Aggarwal, 2018. "Happiness at Work Scale: Construction and Psychometric Validation of a Measure Using Mixed Method Approach," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1439-1463, June.
    4. Brikend AZIRI, 2011. "Job Satisfaction, A Literature Review," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 3(4), pages 77-86, December.
    5. Ruut Veenhoven, 2000. "The Four Qualities of Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-39, March.
    6. Sakari Kainulainen & Juho Saari & Ruut Veenhoven, 2018. "Life-satisfaction is more a matter of feeling well than having what you want. Tests of Veenhoven's theory," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(3), pages 209-235.
    7. M. Sirgy & David Efraty & Phillip Siegel & Dong-Jin Lee, 2001. "A New Measure of Quality of Work Life (QWL) Based on Need Satisfaction and Spillover Theories," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 241-302, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ken Cai Kowalski & Andrew J. Perrin, 2024. "“I have to pick a percentage now”: indeterminate meanings of moderate survey responses," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3041-3061, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Sinval & M. Joseph Sirgy & Dong-Jin Lee & João Marôco, 2020. "The Quality of Work Life Scale: Validity Evidence from Brazil and Portugal," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1323-1351, November.
    2. Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano & Mirko Buonocore, 2018. "Job Satisfaction in the “Big Four” of Europe: Reasoning Between Feeling and Uncertainty Through CUB Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 205-236, August.
    3. Selda TASDEMIR AFSAR, 2014. "Organizational Commitment and Determinants of the Commitment in the context of Changing Working Conditions: Turkey Example," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0702100, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Agnieszka Krugielka & Grazyna Bartkowiak & Sebastian Dama, 2021. "Functioning of Academic Teachers in the Conditions of the COVID-19 Epidemy in Poland in 2020 (Qualitative Test on the Basis of Self-Assessment)," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 269-287.
    5. Nguyen Dinh Tho, 2018. "A Configurational Role of Human Capital Resources in the Quality of Work Life of Marketers: FsQCA and SEM Findings from Vietnam," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 461-478, June.
    6. Marcela-Sefora Nemteanu & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2020. "The Influence of Heavy Work Investment on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 993-993, November.
    7. Vanessa Molinero de Paula & Júlia Teles & Teresa Patrone Cotrim, 2024. "Organizational and Individual Factors Influencing the Quality of Working Life Among Brazilian University Professors during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Indy Wijngaards & Owen C. King & Martijn J. Burger & Job Exel, 2022. "Worker Well-Being: What it Is, and how it Should Be Measured," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 795-832, April.
    9. Remberto Castro-Castañeda & Esperanza Vargas-Jiménez & Sara Menéndez-Espina & Raúl Medina-Centeno, 2023. "Job Insecurity and Company Behavior: Influence of Fear of Job Loss on Individual and Work Environment Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Nor Azimah Chew Abdullah & Nazlina Zakaria & Nida Zahoor, 2021. "Developments in Quality of Work-Life Research and Directions for Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    11. Lilis Surienty & T. Ramayah & May-Chiun Lo & Azlin Tarmizi, 2014. "Quality of Work Life and Turnover Intention: A Partial Least Square (PLS) Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 405-420, October.
    12. Ramawickrama J. & H. H. D. N. P. Opatha & PushpaKumari M. D., 2017. "Quality of Work Life, Job Satisfaction, and the Facets of the Relationship between the Two Constructs," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 167-182, April.
    13. Elena Stefana & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Paola Cocca & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2021. "Composite Indicators to Measure Quality of Working Life in Europe: A Systematic Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1047-1078, October.
    14. Deepika Dixit & Anubha Shekhar Sinha, 2020. "I Am My Own Boss: Do I Have Quality of Work-Life?," Working papers 353, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    15. Faith Martin, 2012. "Perceptions of Links Between Quality of Life Areas: Implications for Measurement and Practice," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 95-107, March.
    16. Agnieszka Bieńkowska & Katarzyna Tworek, 2020. "Job Performance Model Based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Anna S. Gogoleva & Pavel S. Sorokin & Azer G. Efendiev, 2014. "Quality Of Work Life As Methodological Framework In Organizational Studies: State Of The Art And Perspectives For The Future Research," HSE Working papers WP BRP 23/MAN/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    18. João Leitão & Dina Pereira & Ângela Gonçalves, 2021. "Quality of Work Life and Contribution to Productivity: Assessing the Moderator Effects of Burnout Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Sonja Drobnič & Barbara Beham & Patrick Präg, 2010. "Good Job, Good Life? Working Conditions and Quality of Life in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 99(2), pages 205-225, November.
    20. Dina Pereira & João Leitão & Ludovina Ramos, 2022. "Burnout and Quality of Work Life among Municipal Workers: Do Motivating and Economic Factors Play a Mediating Role?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:56:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11135-021-01165-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.