IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v47y2013i2p1237-1257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Sánchez-Algarra
  • M. Anguera

Abstract

A strong dichotomy has traditionally been established between qualitative and quantitative approaches. This question has been the subject of intense debate from a methodological point of view, and in recent years there are clear signs that the conflict is being overcome; nevertheless, we are still some way from a genuine position of complementarity and integration, and the issue remains to be considered in the process of theorization along the tortuous path that leads from the particular to the general. The proposal in this article takes a further step forward as regards this question, this time with respect to the study of interactive behaviour. The key is once again the consideration of a “complete unit” of analysis, but the logic of the observational methodology process enables the perspectives to be sequenced: the study begins with a predominantly qualitative approach before subjecting the data to a given type of recording (through the important support of field formats) and coding (preferably computerized), thus producing a matrix of formally interchangeable data; finally, the criterion is reversed and the study continues under a predominantly quantitative perspective. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & M. Anguera, 2013. "Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1237-1257, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:2:p:1237-1257
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9764-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-012-9764-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-012-9764-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Erzberger & Gerald Prein, 1997. "Triangulation: Validity and empirically-based hypothesis construction," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 141-154, May.
    2. George Muskens, 1985. "Mathematical analysis of content," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 99-103, January.
    3. Paulien Meijer & Nico Verloop & Douwe Beijaard, 2002. "Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 145-167, May.
    4. Robert Smith, 2005. "Social Structural Inquiries, Part 1, Qualitative and Quantitative Theories," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 801-825, December.
    5. Robert Hogenraad & Dean Mckenzie & Normand Péladeau, 2003. "Force and Influence in Content Analysis: The Production of New Social Knowledge," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 221-238, August.
    6. Robert Weber, 1983. "Measurement models for content analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 127-149, April.
    7. Carl Roberts, 2000. "A Conceptual Framework for Quantitative Text Analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 259-274, August.
    8. S. Miller & J. Gatta, 2006. "The Use of Mixed Methods Models and Designs in the Human Sciences: Problems and Prospects," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 595-610, August.
    9. Robert Hogenraad & Dean McKENZIE, 1999. "Replicating Text: The Cumulation of Knowledge in Social Science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 97-116, May.
    10. Norman Blaikie, 1991. "A critique of the use of triangulation in social research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 115-136, May.
    11. Karl Sivesind, 1999. "Structured, Qualitative Comparison," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 361-380, November.
    12. Piet Verschuren, 2001. "Holism versus Reductionism in Modern Social Science Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 389-405, November.
    13. Joanna Sale & Lynne Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil, 2002. "Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 43-53, February.
    14. Janice Kopinak, 1999. "The Use of Triangulation in a Study of Refugee Well-Being," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 169-183, May.
    15. Geert Vissers & Gerton Heyne & Vincent Peters & Jac Guerts, 2001. "The Validity of Laboratory Research in Social and Behavioral Science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 129-145, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Teresa Anguera & Angel Blanco-Villaseñor & José Luis Losada & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2018. "Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2757-2770, November.
    2. Rubén Maneiro & Claudio A Casal & Antonio Ardá & José Luís Losada, 2019. "Application of multivariant decision tree technique in high performance football: The female and male corner kick," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Natália L. Figueiredo & João J. M. Ferreira, 2022. "More than meets the partner: a systematic review and agenda for University–Industry cooperation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 231-273, February.
    4. Shin, Seongmin & Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hansol & Baral, Himlal, 2022. "The structure and pattern of global partnerships in the REDD+ mechanism," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. José Losada & Rumen Manolov, 2015. "The process of basic training, applied training, maintaining the performance of an observer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 339-347, January.
    6. Lopes, João & Farinha, Luís & Ferreira, João J. & Silveira, Paulo, 2018. "Does regional VRIO model help policy-makers to assess the resources of a region? A stakeholder perception approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 659-670.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebeca Raijman & Oshrat Hochman, 2011. "National attachments, economic competition, and social exclusion of non-ethnic migrants in Israel: a mixed-methods approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1151-1174, October.
    2. Andrei Kirilenko & Svetlana Stepchenkova & Rebecca Romsdahl & Kristine Mattis, 2012. "Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 501-522, February.
    3. Robert Hogenraad & Dean Mckenzie & Normand Péladeau, 2003. "Force and Influence in Content Analysis: The Production of New Social Knowledge," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 221-238, August.
    4. G A Hindle & L A Franco, 2009. "Combining problem structuring methods to conduct applied research: a mixed methods approach to studying fitness-to-drive in the UK," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(12), pages 1637-1648, December.
    5. Gjoko Stamenkov, 2023. "Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2923-2946, June.
    6. Achim Goerres & Katrin Prinzen, 2012. "Using mixed methods for the analysis of individuals: a review of necessary and sufficient conditions and an application to welfare state attitudes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 415-450, February.
    7. Paulien Meijer & Nico Verloop & Douwe Beijaard, 2002. "Multi-Method Triangulation in a Qualitative Study on Teachers' Practical Knowledge: An Attempt to Increase Internal Validity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 145-167, May.
    8. C. Poortman & K. Schildkamp, 2012. "Alternative quality standards in qualitative research?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1727-1751, October.
    9. Robert Weber, 1986. "Correlational models of content: reply to Muskens," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 273-275, June.
    10. Andrei Kirilenko & Svetlana Stepchenkova, 2012. "Climate change discourse in mass media: application of computer-assisted content analysis," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 178-191, June.
    11. Sana Mumtaz, 2022. "Should practical usefulness be considered for theory building in HRD? Traditional versus pragmatism approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1245-1259, June.
    12. Haegeman, Karel & Marinelli, Elisabetta & Scapolo, Fabiana & Ricci, Andrea & Sokolov, Alexander, 2013. "Quantitative and qualitative approaches in Future-oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): From combination to integration?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 386-397.
    13. Petra C Gronholm & Oluwadamilola Onagbesan & Poonam Gardner-Sood, 2017. "Care coordinator views and experiences of physical health monitoring in clients with severe mental illness: A qualitative study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(7), pages 580-588, November.
    14. Marsel Cara, 2013. "Researching Inclusive Education in Albania: Using Mixed Methods in School/Educational Psychology," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    15. Amiri, Babak & Karimianghadim, Ramin, 2024. "A novel text clustering model based on topic modelling and social network analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    16. Rosalia Diaz‐Carrion & Macarena López‐Fernández & Pedro M. Romero‐Fernandez, 2020. "Sustainable human resource management and employee engagement: A holistic assessment instrument," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1749-1760, July.
    17. Eugenio De Gregorio & Ivana Tagliafico & Alfredo Verde, 2018. "A comparison of qualitatively and quantitatively driven analytic procedures of psychotherapeutic group sessions with deviant adolescents," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1731-1760, July.
    18. Fatoumata Fofana & Pat Bazeley & Antoine Regnault, 2020. "Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Stephen Buetow, 2014. "How Can a Family Resemblances Approach Help to Typify Qualitative Research? Exploring the Complexity of Simplicity," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, October.
    20. Dalibor Stanimirovic & Eva Murko & Tadej Battelino & Urh Groselj & Mojca Zerjav Tansek, 2021. "Towards a Comprehensive Strategy for the Management of Rare Diseases in Slovenia: Outlining an IT-Enabled Ecosystemic Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:47:y:2013:i:2:p:1237-1257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.