IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v17y1983i2p127-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement models for content analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Weber

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Weber, 1983. "Measurement models for content analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 127-149, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:17:y:1983:i:2:p:127-149
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00143616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00143616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00143616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Namenwirth & Richard Bibbee, 1976. "Change within or of the system: An example from the history of American values," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 145-164, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & M. Anguera, 2013. "Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1237-1257, February.
    2. Andrei Kirilenko & Svetlana Stepchenkova & Rebecca Romsdahl & Kristine Mattis, 2012. "Computer-assisted analysis of public discourse: a case study of the precautionary principle in the US and UK press," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 501-522, February.
    3. Robert Hogenraad & Dean Mckenzie & Normand Péladeau, 2003. "Force and Influence in Content Analysis: The Production of New Social Knowledge," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 221-238, August.
    4. Robert Hogenraad & Dean McKENZIE, 1999. "Replicating Text: The Cumulation of Knowledge in Social Science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 97-116, May.
    5. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 1984. "Computerunterstützte Inhaltsanalyse und sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 7-14.
    6. Robert Weber, 1986. "Correlational models of content: reply to Muskens," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 273-275, June.
    7. Nijkamp, Peter & Vindigni, Gabriella & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., 2008. "Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 217-231, September.
    8. Bouckenooghe, Dave & Schwarz, Gavin M. & Kanar, Adam & Sanders, Karin, 2021. "Revisiting research on attitudes toward organizational change: Bibliometric analysis and content facet analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 137-148.
    9. Andrei Kirilenko & Svetlana Stepchenkova, 2012. "Climate change discourse in mass media: application of computer-assisted content analysis," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 178-191, June.
    10. Suyoun Kim & Yeong Hye Yoon & Jin-young Kim & Seul Ki Lee, 2024. "Community Implementation of the ASEAN Community-Based Tourism (CBT) Standard: An Executive Stakeholder Study on Lao PDR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Bal, Frans & Nijkamp, Peter, 2001. "In search of valid results in a complex economic environment: The potential of meta-analysis and value transfer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 364-384, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans-Dieter Klingemann & Peter Mohler & Robert Weber, 1982. "Cultural indicators based on content analysis: a secondary analysis of Sorokin's data on fluctuations of systems of truth," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:17:y:1983:i:2:p:127-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.