IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/qualqt/v49y2015i1p339-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The process of basic training, applied training, maintaining the performance of an observer

Author

Listed:
  • José Losada
  • Rumen Manolov

Abstract

In the field of observational methodology the observer is obviously a central figure, and close attention should be paid to the process through which he or she acquires, applies, and maintains the skills required. Basic training in how to apply the operational definitions of categories and the rules for coding, coupled with the opportunity to use the observation instrument in real-life situations, can have a positive effect in terms of the degree of agreement achieved when one evaluates intra- and inter-observer reliability. Several authors, including Arias et al. (Apunts, 4:40–45, 2009 ) and Medina and Delgado (Motricidad: Revista de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 5:69–86, 1999 ) , have put forward proposals for the process of basic and applied training in this context. Reid and De Master (ORI Res Bull, 12:1–13, 1972 ) focuses on the observer’s performance and how to maintain the acquired skills, it being argued that periodic checks are needed after initial training because an observer may, over time, become less reliable due to the inherent complexity of category systems. The purpose of this subsequent training is to maintain acceptable levels of observer reliability. Various strategies can be used to this end, including providing feedback about those categories associated with a good reliability index, or offering re-training in how to apply those that yield lower indices. The aim of this study is to develop a performance-based index that is capable of assessing an observer’s ability to produce reliable observations in conjunction with other observers. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • José Losada & Rumen Manolov, 2015. "The process of basic training, applied training, maintaining the performance of an observer," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 339-347, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:339-347
    DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-9989-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11135-014-9989-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11135-014-9989-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & M. Anguera, 2013. "Qualitative/quantitative integration in the inductive observational study of interactive behaviour: impact of recording and coding among predominating perspectives," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1237-1257, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gómez, Miguel A. & Cid, Adrián & Rivas, Fernando & Barreira, Júlia & Chiminazzo, João Guilherme Cren & Prieto, Jaime, 2021. "Dynamic analysis of scoring performance in elite men's badminton according to contextual-related variables," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Rubén Maneiro & Claudio A Casal & Antonio Ardá & José Luís Losada, 2019. "Application of multivariant decision tree technique in high performance football: The female and male corner kick," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Manuel Conejero Suárez & Antônio L. P. Serenini & Jara González-Silva & M. Perla Moreno Arroyo, 2020. "Factors Used to Make Appropriate Decisions in Youth Categories in Volleyball," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Iyán Iván-Baragaño & Rubén Maneiro & José L. Losada & Antonio Ardá, 2021. "Multivariate Analysis of the Offensive Phase in High-Performance Women’s Soccer: A Mixed Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Yasin Akinci, 2023. "Examining the Differences Between Playoff Teams and Non-Playoff Teams in Men’s Euroleague; Play-Type Statistics Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Teresa Anguera & Angel Blanco-Villaseñor & José Luis Losada & Pedro Sánchez-Algarra & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, 2018. "Revisiting the difference between mixed methods and multimethods: Is it all in the name?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2757-2770, November.
    2. Natália L. Figueiredo & João J. M. Ferreira, 2022. "More than meets the partner: a systematic review and agenda for University–Industry cooperation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 231-273, February.
    3. Rubén Maneiro & Claudio A Casal & Antonio Ardá & José Luís Losada, 2019. "Application of multivariant decision tree technique in high performance football: The female and male corner kick," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Shin, Seongmin & Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hansol & Baral, Himlal, 2022. "The structure and pattern of global partnerships in the REDD+ mechanism," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    5. Lopes, João & Farinha, Luís & Ferreira, João J. & Silveira, Paulo, 2018. "Does regional VRIO model help policy-makers to assess the resources of a region? A stakeholder perception approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 659-670.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:qualqt:v:49:y:2015:i:1:p:339-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.