IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v83y2018i3d10.1007_s11336-018-9604-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autoregressive Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Models with Crossed Random Effects: An Application to Intensive Binary Time Series Eye-Tracking Data

Author

Listed:
  • Sun-Joo Cho

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Sarah Brown-Schmidt

    (Vanderbilt University)

  • Woo-yeol Lee

    (Vanderbilt University)

Abstract

As a method to ascertain person and item effects in psycholinguistics, a generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM) with crossed random effects has met limitations in handing serial dependence across persons and items. This paper presents an autoregressive GLMM with crossed random effects that accounts for variability in lag effects across persons and items. The model is shown to be applicable to intensive binary time series eye-tracking data when researchers are interested in detecting experimental condition effects while controlling for previous responses. In addition, a simulation study shows that ignoring lag effects can lead to biased estimates and underestimated standard errors for the experimental condition effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Woo-yeol Lee, 2018. "Autoregressive Generalized Linear Mixed Effect Models with Crossed Random Effects: An Application to Intensive Binary Time Series Eye-Tracking Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 751-771, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:83:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-018-9604-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9604-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11336-018-9604-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11336-018-9604-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joe, Harry, 2008. "Accuracy of Laplace approximation for discrete response mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5066-5074, August.
    2. Peter Molenaar, 1985. "A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 50(2), pages 181-202, June.
    3. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "Handling initial conditions and endogenous covariates in dynamic/transition models for binary data with unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(2), pages 211-237, February.
    4. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    5. Ludwig Fahrmeir & Heinz Kaufmann, 1987. "Regression Models For Non‐Stationary Categorical Time Series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 147-160, March.
    6. Cho, S.-J. & Rabe-Hesketh, S., 2011. "Alternating imputation posterior estimation of models with crossed random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 12-25, January.
    7. Paul Boeck, 2008. "Random Item IRT Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(4), pages 533-559, December.
    8. Cora J. M. Maas & Joop J. Hox, 2004. "Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 58(2), pages 127-137, May.
    9. Sonja Greven & Thomas Kneib, 2010. "On the behaviour of marginal and conditional AIC in linear mixed models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 773-789.
    10. Toni L. Bisconti & C. S. Bergeman & Steven M. Boker, 2004. "Emotional Well-Being in Recently Bereaved Widows: A Dynamical Systems Approach," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 59(4), pages 158-167.
    11. Molenberghs, Geert & Verbeke, Geert, 2007. "Likelihood Ratio, Score, and Wald Tests in a Constrained Parameter Space," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 22-27, February.
    12. Daniel J. Bauer & Li Cai, 2009. "Consequences of Unmodeled Nonlinear Effects in Multilevel Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 34(1), pages 97-114, March.
    13. Hung, Ying & Zarnitsyna, Veronika & Zhang, Yan & Zhu, Cheng & Wu, C. F. Jeff, 2008. "Binary Time Series Modeling With Application to Adhesion Frequency Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103(483), pages 1248-1259.
    14. Stef Buuren, 1997. "Fitting arma time series by structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 215-236, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Paul De Boeck & Jianhong Shen, 2020. "Modeling Intensive Polytomous Time-Series Eye-Tracking Data: A Dynamic Tree-Based Item Response Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 154-184, March.
    2. Michel Wedel & Rik Pieters & Ralf Lans, 2023. "Modeling Eye Movements During Decision Making: A Review," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 697-729, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun-Joo Cho & Paul Boeck & Susan Embretson & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "Additive Multilevel Item Structure Models with Random Residuals: Item Modeling for Explanation and Item Generation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 84-104, January.
    2. Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Paul De Boeck & Jianhong Shen, 2020. "Modeling Intensive Polytomous Time-Series Eye-Tracking Data: A Dynamic Tree-Based Item Response Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(1), pages 154-184, March.
    3. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    4. Sijia Huang & Li Cai, 2024. "Cross-Classified Item Response Theory Modeling With an Application to Student Evaluation of Teaching," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 311-341, June.
    5. Cantoni, Eva & Jacot, Nadège & Ghisletta, Paolo, 2024. "Review and comparison of measures of explained variation and model selection in linear mixed-effects models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 150-168.
    6. Hanneke Geerlings & Cees Glas & Wim Linden, 2011. "Modeling Rule-Based Item Generation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 337-359, April.
    7. Stefano Marchetti & Maciej Beręsewicz & Nicola Salvati & Marcin Szymkowiak & Łukasz Wawrowski, 2018. "The use of a three‐level M‐quantile model to map poverty at local administrative unit 1 in Poland," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1077-1104, October.
    8. Philipp F. M. Baumann & Enzo Rossi & Alexander Volkmann, 2020. "What Drives Inflation and How: Evidence from Additive Mixed Models Selected by cAIC," Papers 2006.06274, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    9. Joshua B. Gilbert & James S. Kim & Luke W. Miratrix, 2023. "Modeling Item-Level Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With the Explanatory Item Response Model: Leveraging Large-Scale Online Assessments to Pinpoint the Impact of Educational Interventions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 889-913, December.
    10. Minjeong Jeon & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2012. "Profile-Likelihood Approach for Estimating Generalized Linear Mixed Models With Factor Structures," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(4), pages 518-542, August.
    11. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    13. Yu, Dalei & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2012. "Conditional Akaike information criterion for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 629-644.
    14. Chih-Hao Chang & Hsin-Cheng Huang & Ching-Kang Ing, 2022. "Inference of random effects for linear mixed-effects models with a fixed number of clusters," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(6), pages 1143-1161, December.
    15. Comets, Emmanuelle & Lavenu, Audrey & Lavielle, Marc, 2017. "Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Mixed Effect Models Using saemix, an R Implementation of the SAEM Algorithm," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 80(i03).
    16. Baey, Charlotte & Cournède, Paul-Henry & Kuhn, Estelle, 2019. "Asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio test statistics for variance components in nonlinear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 107-122.
    17. Colin Griesbach & Andreas Groll & Elisabeth Bergherr, 2021. "Addressing cluster-constant covariates in mixed effects models via likelihood-based boosting techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, July.
    18. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2017. "A Variational Maximization–Maximization Algorithm for Generalized Linear Mixed Models with Crossed Random Effects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(3), pages 693-716, September.
    19. Craiu, Radu V. & Duchesne, Thierry, 2018. "A scalable and efficient covariate selection criterion for mixed effects regression models with unknown random effects structure," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 154-161.
    20. Guangjian Zhang & Sy-Miin Chow & Anthony Ong, 2011. "A Sandwich-Type Standard Error Estimator of SEM Models with Multivariate Time Series," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 77-96, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:83:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11336-018-9604-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.