IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v58y2021i1d10.1007_s12597-020-00473-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal pricing and lot-sizing policies under promotional expense for some Veblen products

Author

Listed:
  • Anil K. Agrawal

    (Indian Institute of Technology (BHU))

  • Amit Ambar Gupta

    (Indian Institute of Technology (BHU))

  • Manu K. Vora

    (Business Excellence, Inc.)

Abstract

The desire for social status motivates people to possess rare and exclusive luxury products. People like to consume expensive product and service in order to associate themselves with the elite class and build a distinct image of self in society. The demand of luxury products increases with the increase in the price. This phenomenon is also known as Veblen effect, and products with such characteristics are called Veblen products. The demand for products, in general, is positively influenced by promotional expenses. Research suggests that the promotional effort may provide an opportunity to charge more of selling price without sacrificing the demand. With this aspect, the paper focuses on determining the optimal sales price, lot-size as well as promotional expenses for Veblen products. The promotional expense for the two different markets; niche as well as the mass market has been considered. A mathematical model has been proposed for obtaining the optimal price, lot-size and promotional expenses for such product. Some illustrative numerical examples have been taken for both the markets and solved with the help of LINGO optimization software. The sensitivity analysis was also carried out and observed that ordering cost and holding cost rate has almost no impact on optimal inventory policy, but the unit cost has. The proposed formulation of the considered problem is a non-linear integer programming mathematical model and is thus NP-hard. Therefore, genetic algorithm and teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO) based heuristics have been proposed for solving the problem in a computationally efficient manner. However, these methods were found to take more CPU time compared to LINGO optimization software. TLBO takes the highest CPU time but is rendering solutions like the ones from LINGO.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil K. Agrawal & Amit Ambar Gupta & Manu K. Vora, 2021. "Optimal pricing and lot-sizing policies under promotional expense for some Veblen products," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 83-108, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00473-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-020-00473-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-020-00473-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-020-00473-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chung, Kun-Jen & Liao, Jui-Jung & Ting, Pin-Shou & Lin, Shy-Der & Srivastava, H.M., 2015. "The algorithm for the optimal cycle time and pricing decisions for an integrated inventory system with order-size dependent trade credit in supply chain management," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 268(C), pages 322-333.
    2. Bhunia, A.K. & Shaikh, Ali Akbar, 2015. "An application of PSO in a two-warehouse inventory model for deteriorating item under permissible delay in payment with different inventory policies," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 831-850.
    3. Jaikumar, Saravana & Singh, Ramendra & Sarin, Ankur, 2018. "‘I show off, so I am well off’: Subjective economic well-being and conspicuous consumption in an emerging economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 386-393.
    4. Catherine Janssen & Joëlle Vanhamme & Sina Leblanc, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Post-Print hal-01745306, HAL.
    5. Landi, Massimiliano, 2015. "A class of symmetric and quadratic utility functions generating Giffen demand," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 50-54.
    6. Prentice, Catherine & Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia, 2018. "Consumer-based approach to customer engagement – The case of luxury brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 325-332.
    7. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    8. de Kok, Ton & Grob, Christopher & Laumanns, Marco & Minner, Stefan & Rambau, Jörg & Schade, Konrad, 2018. "A typology and literature review on stochastic multi-echelon inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 955-983.
    9. Jungkyu Kim & Yushin Hong & Taebok Kim, 2011. "Pricing and ordering policies for price-dependent demand in a supply chain of a single retailer and a single manufacturer," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 81-89.
    10. Amatulli, Cesare & Guido, Gianluigi & Nataraajan, Rajan, 2015. "Luxury purchasing among older consumers: exploring inferences about cognitive Age, status, and style motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1945-1952.
    11. Raghunath Singh Rao & Richard Schaefer, 2013. "Conspicuous Consumption and Dynamic Pricing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 786-804, September.
    12. Glock, C. H. & Kim, T., 2012. "A joint economic lot sizemodel with returnable transport items," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 59079, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    13. McClure, James & Kumcu, Erdogan, 2008. "Promotions and product pricing: Parsimony versus Veblenesque demand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 105-117, January.
    14. Kastanakis, Minas N. & Balabanis, George, 2012. "Between the mass and the class: Antecedents of the “bandwagon” luxury consumption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1399-1407.
    15. Giri, B.C. & Sharma, S., 2014. "Manufacturer's pricing strategy in a two-level supply chain with competing retailers and advertising cost dependent demand," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 102-111.
    16. Seifbarghy, Mehdi & Nouhi, Khashayar & Mahmoudi, Amin, 2015. "Contract design in a supply chain considering price and quality dependent demand with customer segmentation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 108-118.
    17. Winkelmann, Rainer, 2012. "Conspicuous consumption and satisfaction," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 183-191.
    18. H. Leibenstein, 1950. "Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(2), pages 183-207.
    19. B.C. Giri & T. Maiti, 2013. "Supply chain model with price- and trade credit-sensitive demand under two-level permissible delay in payments," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 937-948.
    20. Janssen, Larissa & Claus, Thorsten & Sauer, Jürgen, 2016. "Literature review of deteriorating inventory models by key topics from 2012 to 2015," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-112.
    21. Beuckels, Emma & Hudders, Liselot, 2016. "An experimental study to investigate the impact of image interactivity on the perception of luxury in an online shopping context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 135-142.
    22. Mosca, Alyssa & Vidyarthi, Navneet & Satir, Ahmet, 2019. "Integrated transportation – inventory models: A review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    23. Glock, C. H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: a review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57811, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    24. Ajitha, S. & Sivakumar, V.J., 2017. "Understanding the effect of personal and social value on attitude and usage behavior of luxury cosmetic brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 103-113.
    25. Caulkins, J.P. & Feichtinger, G. & Grass, D. & Hartl, R.F. & Kort, P.M. & Seidl, A., 2011. "Optimal pricing of a conspicuous product during a recession that freezes capital markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 163-174, January.
    26. C. Clark & Ulrich Doraszelski & Michaela Draganska, 2009. "The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 207-236, June.
    27. Pino, Giovanni & Amatulli, Cesare & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Nataraajan, Rajan & Guido, Gianluigi, 2019. "Brand prominence and social status in luxury consumption: A comparison of emerging and mature markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 163-172.
    28. Glock, Christoph H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 671-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kilsheimer Eastman, Jacqueline & Iyer, Rajesh & Babin, Barry, 2022. "Luxury not for the masses: Measuring inconspicuous luxury motivations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 509-523.
    2. A.K. Agrawal & A.A. Gupta & M.K. Vora, 2020. "Pricing and lot-sizing policies for products with demand under Veblen effect," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 85-93, June.
    3. Feng, Wenting & Yang, Morgan X. & Yu, Irina Y., 2023. "From devil to angel: How being envied for luxury brand social media word of mouth discourages counterfeit purchases," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    5. Das, Manish & Habib, Mohshin & Saha, Victor & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2021. "Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on uniqueness dominance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Tarhini, Hussein & Karam, Mario & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2020. "An integrated single-vendor multi-buyer production inventory model with transshipments between buyers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    7. Castellano, Davide & Gallo, Mosè & Grassi, Andrea & Santillo, Liberatina C., 2019. "The effect of GHG emissions on production, inventory replenishment and routing decisions in a single vendor-multiple buyers supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 30-42.
    8. Jonas C.P. Yu & Kung-Jeng Wang & Yu-Siang Lin, 2016. "Managing dual warehouses with an incentive policy for deteriorating items," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 586-602, February.
    9. Adeinat, Hamza & Pazhani, Subramanian & Mendoza, Abraham & Ventura, Jose A., 2022. "Coordination of pricing and inventory replenishment decisions in a supply chain with multiple geographically dispersed retailers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. Noblesse, Ann M. & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Van Houdt, Benny, 2014. "Lot sizing and lead time decisions in production/inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 351-360.
    11. Chan, Chi Kin & Fang, Fei & Langevin, André, 2018. "Single-vendor multi-buyer supply chain coordination with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 110-133.
    12. Jawad, Hussam & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Nuwayhid, Rida Y., 2018. "Improving supply chain sustainability using exergy analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 258-271.
    13. Pal, Brojeswar & Sana, Shib Sankar & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu, 2014. "Joint pricing and ordering policy for two echelon imperfect production inventory model with two cycles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 229-238.
    14. Faranak Emtehani & Nasim Nahavandi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, 2021. "A joint inventory–finance model for coordinating a capital-constrained supply chain with financing limitations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-39, December.
    15. Daryanto, Yosef & Wee, Hui Ming & Astanti, Ririn Diar, 2019. "Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 368-383.
    16. Mainolfi, Giada, 2020. "Exploring materialistic bandwagon behaviour in online fashion consumption: A survey of Chinese luxury consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 286-293.
    17. Herbon, Avi, 2020. "An approximated solution to the constrained integrated manufacturer-buyer supply problem," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    18. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    19. Meherishi, Lavanya & Narayana, Sushmita A. & Ranjani, K.S., 2021. "Integrated product and packaging decisions with secondary packaging returns and protective packaging management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 930-952.
    20. Beatrice Marchi & Simone Zanoni & Mohamad Y. Jaber, 2020. "Improving Supply Chain Profit through Reverse Factoring: A New Multi-Suppliers Single-Vendor Joint Economic Lot Size Model," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00473-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.