IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v269y2018i1p258-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving supply chain sustainability using exergy analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jawad, Hussam
  • Jaber, Mohamad Y.
  • Nuwayhid, Rida Y.

Abstract

Sustainable supply chain management is the improved level of management through the integration of environmental and social issues in parallel to the economic issues. It has emerged as a growing subject that now receives increasing interest from practitioners and academicians. Limited attempts have been made to take a broader look at the overall issues that form the core topics of this type of supply chain. In fact, there have been many exclusive studies that investigated the impact of inadvertent or unavoidable costs of supply chain processes. Exergy analysis is a powerful thermodynamic tool that may be employed to analyze and identify the inefficiencies in a process or a system. It has also been extended to efficiently evaluate how sustainable an industrial system, process or product is. This paper introduces exergetic models that compute and compare the consumed exergy for two coordination policies. It, also, evaluates the consumed exergy when producing/ordering locally versus globally. It recognizes the importance of financial, social and environmental aspects of choosing the more sustainable destination to produce and distribute a product. Numerical examples are presented and discussed to provide some insights for managers and decision-makers to select between domestic policies based on the consumed exergy and the monetary cost. Results show that societies can gain more from less consumed exergy and firms can save on some costs when producing/ordering domestically. This paper recommends to governments and other stakeholders to take actions that are effective in making societies consume resources wisely.

Suggested Citation

  • Jawad, Hussam & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Nuwayhid, Rida Y., 2018. "Improving supply chain sustainability using exergy analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 258-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:1:p:258-271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221717309013
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glock, C. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & El Saadany, A., 2013. "Supply Chain Coordination with Emission Reduction Incentives," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57672, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Enrico Sciubba, 2004. "From Engineering Economics to Extended Exergy Accounting: A Possible Path from Monetary to Resource‐Based Costing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 8(4), pages 19-40, October.
    3. Sciubba, Enrico, 2011. "A revised calculation of the econometric factors α- and β for the Extended Exergy Accounting method," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 1060-1066.
    4. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    5. Fukuda, Kenji, 2003. "Production of exergy from labour and energy resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(4), pages 435-448, December.
    6. Glock, C. H. & Kim, T., 2012. "A joint economic lot sizemodel with returnable transport items," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 59079, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Geldermann, Jutta & Treitz, Martin & Rentz, Otto, 2006. "Integrated technique assessment based on the pinch analysis approach for the design of production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 1020-1032, June.
    8. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 43-53, September.
    9. Caniato, Federico & Golini, Ruggero & Kalchschmidt, Matteo, 2013. "The effect of global supply chain configuration on the relationship between supply chain improvement programs and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 285-293.
    10. Glock, C. H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: a review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57811, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Aleksander Banasik & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2017. "Assessing alternative production options for eco-efficient food supply chains using multi-objective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 341-362, March.
    12. Maxim A Bushuev & Alfred Guiffrida & M. Y. Jaber & Mehmood Khan, 2015. "A review of inventory lot sizing review papers," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 283-298, March.
    13. Hill, Roger M., 1997. "The single-vendor single-buyer integrated production-inventory model with a generalised policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 493-499, March.
    14. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Rosen, Marc A., 2008. "The economic order quantity repair and waste disposal model with entropy cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 109-120, July.
    15. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    16. Forkenbrock, David J., 1999. "External costs of intercity truck freight transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 505-526.
    17. Banasik, Aleksander & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Claassen, G.D.H. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2017. "Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 409-420.
    18. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Hultman, Peter, 1989. "Exergetic and inventory-theoretic aspects of energy storage," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 343-350, May.
    19. Glock, Christoph H., 2012. "The joint economic lot size problem: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 671-686.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, J. & Goel, A. & Kua, H.W. & Wang, C.H. & Peng, Y.H., 2021. "Evaluating the urban metabolism sustainability of municipal solid waste management system: An extended exergy accounting and indexing perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Song, Dan & Lin, Ling & Wu, Ye, 2019. "Extended exergy accounting for a typical cement industry in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 678-686.
    3. Tiwari, Sunil & Kazemi, Nima & Modak, Nikunja Mohan & Cárdenas-Barrón, Leopoldo Eduardo & Sarkar, Sumon, 2020. "The effect of human errors on an integrated stochastic supply chain model with setup cost reduction and backorder price discount," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Roozbeh Nia, Ali & Awasthi, Anjali & Bhuiyan, Nadia, 2023. "Integrate exergy costs and carbon reduction policy in order to optimize the sustainability development of coal supply chains in uncertain conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bazan, Ehab & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone, 2017. "Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 394-408.
    2. Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H., 2021. "The impact of controllable production rates on the performance of inventory systems: A systematic review of the literature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 703-720.
    3. Castellano, Davide & Gallo, Mosè & Grassi, Andrea & Santillo, Liberatina C., 2019. "The effect of GHG emissions on production, inventory replenishment and routing decisions in a single vendor-multiple buyers supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 30-42.
    4. Daryanto, Yosef & Wee, Hui Ming & Astanti, Ririn Diar, 2019. "Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 368-383.
    5. Bazan, Ehab & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Zanoni, Simone & Zavanella, Lucio E., 2014. "Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) with Consignment Stock (CS) agreement for a two-level supply chain with an imperfect production process with/without restoration interruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 289-301.
    6. Vahid Reza Soleymanfar & Ahmad Makui & Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2022. "Sustainable EOQ and EPQ models for a two-echelon multi-product supply chain with return policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5317-5343, April.
    7. Beck, Fabian G. & Glock, Christoph H. & Kim, Taebok, 2017. "Coordination of a production network with a single buyer and multiple vendors with geometrically increasing batch shipments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 633-646.
    8. Roozbeh Nia, Ali & Awasthi, Anjali & Bhuiyan, Nadia, 2023. "Integrate exergy costs and carbon reduction policy in order to optimize the sustainability development of coal supply chains in uncertain conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    9. AlDurgam, Mohammad & Adegbola, Kehinde & Glock, Christoph H., 2017. "A single-vendor single-manufacturer integrated inventory model with stochastic demand and variable production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 335-350.
    10. Sajadieh, Mohsen S. & Larsen, Christian, 2015. "A coordinated manufacturer-retailer model under stochastic demand and production rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 64-70.
    11. Wu, Kan & Yuan, Xue-Ming, 2016. "Optimal production-inventory policy for an integrated multi-stage supply chain with time-varying demandAuthor-Name: Zhao, Shi Tao," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 364-379.
    12. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    13. Mehmood Khan & Matloub Hussain & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2017. "Learning and screening errors in an EPQ inventory model for supply chains with stochastic lead time demands," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4816-4832, August.
    14. Mostafa Parsa & Ali Shahandeh Nookabadi & Zümbül Atan & Yaser Malekian, 2022. "An optimal inventory policy for a multi-echelon closed-loop supply chain of postconsumer recycled content products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1887-1938, July.
    15. Hariga, Moncer & Gumus, Mehmet & Daghfous, Abdelkader, 2014. "Storage constrained vendor managed inventory models with unequal shipment frequencies," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 94-106.
    16. Beatriz Abdul-Jalbar & Roberto Dorta-Guerra & José M. Gutiérrez & Joaquín Sicilia, 2021. "Production/Inventory Policies for a Two-Echelon System with Credit Period Incentives," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Beullens, Patrick, 2014. "Revisiting foundations in lot sizing—Connections between Harris, Crowther, Monahan, and Clark," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 68-81.
    18. Lucio Enrico Zavanella & Beatrice Marchi & Simone Zanoni & Ivan Ferretti, 2019. "Energy considerations for the economic production quantity and the joint economic lot sizing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 845-865, September.
    19. Braglia, Marcello & Castellano, Davide & Frosolini, Marco, 2014. "Safety stock management in single vendor–single buyer problem under VMI with consignment stock agreement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 16-31.
    20. Konur, Dinçer, 2017. "Non-collaborative emission targets joining and quantity flow decisions in a Stackelberg setting," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 60-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:269:y:2018:i:1:p:258-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.