IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v79y2015i2p1079-1089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest

Author

Listed:
  • V. Kohestani
  • M. Hassanlourad
  • A. Ardakani

Abstract

The prediction of liquefaction potential of soil due to an earthquake is an essential task in civil engineering. In this paper, random forest (RF) method is introduced and investigated for the prediction of seismic liquefaction potential of soil based on the cone penetration test data. RF has been proposed on the basis of classification and regression trees with “ensemble learning” strategy. The RF models were developed and validated on a relatively large dataset comprising 226 field records of liquefaction performance and cone penetration test measurements. The database contains the information about depth of potentially liquefiable soil layer (D), cone tip resistance ( $$q_{\text{c}}$$ q c ), sleeve friction ratio ( $$R_{\text{f}}$$ R f ), effective vertical stress ( $$\sigma_{0}^{\prime }$$ σ 0 ′ ), total vertical stress ( $$\sigma_{0}$$ σ 0 ), maximum horizontal ground surface acceleration ( $$\alpha_{\hbox{max} }$$ α max ) and earthquake magnitude ( $$M_{\text{w}}$$ M w ). Two RF models (Model I and Model II) are developed for predicting the occurrence and non-occurrence of liquefaction on the basis of combination of above input parameters. The results of RF models have been compared with the available artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) models. It is shown that the proposed RF models provide more accurate results than the ANN and SVM models proposed in the literature. The developed RF provides a viable tool for civil engineers to determine the liquefaction potential of soil. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • V. Kohestani & M. Hassanlourad & A. Ardakani, 2015. "Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1079-1089, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:79:y:2015:i:2:p:1079-1089
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1893-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-015-1893-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-015-1893-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vincenzi, Simone & Zucchetta, Matteo & Franzoi, Piero & Pellizzato, Michele & Pranovi, Fabio & De Leo, Giulio A. & Torricelli, Patrizia, 2011. "Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1471-1478.
    2. Xinhua Xue & Xingguo Yang, 2013. "Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of soil liquefaction," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 901-917, June.
    3. Mendez, Guillermo & Lohr, Sharon, 2011. "Estimating residual variance in random forest regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 2937-2950, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Binh Thai Pham & Chongchong Qi & Lanh Si Ho & Trung Nguyen-Thoi & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Manh Duc Nguyen & Huu Duy Nguyen & Hai-Bang Ly & Hiep Van Le & Indra Prakash, 2020. "A Novel Hybrid Soft Computing Model Using Random Forest and Particle Swarm Optimization for Estimation of Undrained Shear Strength of Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Yong-gang Zhang & Junbo Qiu & Yan Zhang & Yongyao Wei, 2021. "The adoption of ELM to the prediction of soil liquefaction based on CPT," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 539-549, May.
    3. Muhammad Ali & Naseer Muhammad Khan & Qiangqiang Gao & Kewang Cao & Danial Jahed Armaghani & Saad S. Alarifi & Hafeezur Rehman & Izhar Mithal Jiskani, 2023. "Prediction of Coal Dilatancy Point Using Acoustic Emission Characteristics: Insight Experimental and Artificial Intelligence Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Chongchong Qi & Andy Fourie & Xuhao Du & Xiaolin Tang, 2018. "Prediction of open stope hangingwall stability using random forests," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 1179-1197, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    2. So Young Woo & Chung Gil Jung & Ji Wan Lee & Seong Joon Kim, 2019. "Evaluation of Watershed Scale Aquatic Ecosystem Health by SWAT Modeling and Random Forest Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. das Neves, Patricia Bittencourt Tavares & Blanco, Claudio José Cavalcante & Montenegro Duarte, André Augusto Azevedo & das Neves, Filipe Bittencourt Souza & das Neves, Isabela Bittencourt Souza & de P, 2021. "Amazon rainforest deforestation influenced by clandestine and regular roadway network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Grimmett, Liam & Whitsed, Rachel & Horta, Ana, 2020. "Presence-only species distribution models are sensitive to sample prevalence: Evaluating models using spatial prediction stability and accuracy metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    5. Netrananda Sahu & Pritiranjan Das & Atul Saini & Ayush Varun & Suraj Kumar Mallick & Rajiv Nayan & S. P. Aggarwal & Balaram Pani & Ravi Kesharwani & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Analysis of Tea Plantation Suitability Using Geostatistical and Machine Learning Techniques: A Case of Darjeeling Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Xiwen Zhang & Xiaowei Tang & Ryosuke Uzuoka, 2015. "Numerical simulation of 3D liquefaction disasters using an automatic time stepping method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(2), pages 1275-1287, June.
    7. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers 29/13, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Kosicki, Jakub Z., 2017. "Should topographic metrics be considered when predicting species density of birds on a large geographical scale? A case of Random Forest approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 76-85.
    9. Ewa Wilk & Małgorzata Krówczyńska & Bogdan Zagajewski, 2019. "Modelling the Spatial Distribution of Asbestos—Cement Products in Poland with the Use of the Random Forest Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    10. Fukuda, Shinji & Spreer, Wolfram & Yasunaga, Eriko & Yuge, Kozue & Sardsud, Vicha & Müller, Joachim, 2013. "Random Forests modelling for the estimation of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) fruit yields under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 142-150.
    11. Wiltshire, Kathryn H & Tanner, Jason E, 2020. "Comparing maximum entropy modelling methods to inform aquaculture site selection for novel seaweed species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    12. Yong-gang Zhang & Junbo Qiu & Yan Zhang & Yongyao Wei, 2021. "The adoption of ELM to the prediction of soil liquefaction based on CPT," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(1), pages 539-549, May.
    13. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2012. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP14/12, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Lei Wang & Haibo Du & Kai Liu & Shengwei Zong, 2018. "Predicting Wetland Distribution Changes under Climate Change and Human Activities in a Mid- and High-Latitude Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Jig Han Jeong & Jonathan P Resop & Nathaniel D Mueller & David H Fleisher & Kyungdahm Yun & Ethan E Butler & Dennis J Timlin & Kyo-Moon Shim & James S Gerber & Vangimalla R Reddy & Soo-Hyung Kim, 2016. "Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    16. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2012. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers 14/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Xuesong Zhang & Biao He & Mohanad Muayad Sabri Sabri & Mohammed Al-Bahrani & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh, 2022. "Soil Liquefaction Prediction Based on Bayesian Optimization and Support Vector Machines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    18. Peter Hall & Joel L. Horowitz, 2013. "A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP29/13, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. Yihui Chen & Minjie Li, 2019. "Evaluation of influencing factors on tea production based on random forest regression and mean impact value," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(7), pages 340-347.
    20. Ramosaj, Burim & Pauly, Markus, 2019. "Consistent estimation of residual variance with random forest Out-Of-Bag errors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 49-57.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:79:y:2015:i:2:p:1079-1089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.