IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v75y2015i2p1489-1530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A scenario-based risk framework for determining consequences of different failure modes of earth dams

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Cleary
  • Mahesh Prakash
  • Stuart Mead
  • Vincent Lemiale
  • Geoff Robinson
  • Fanghong Ye
  • Sida Ouyang
  • Xinming Tang

Abstract

Failure modes for earth dams are extensively reviewed and analysed using a three-pronged approach including a literature review, physical observations of a representative earth dam site and finite element structural analysis of the dam wall. Several failure scenarios are used for predicting consequences in terms of downstream inundation and damage. The fluid flow component is performed using the mesh-free smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. For a representative earthen dam, piping and landslip are identified as key failure modes based on a combination of finite element analysis, theory and physical observations. Inundation behaviour is very different for the two failure modes. The landslip failure is the most critical one for the dam studied with flood water breaking the river bank and affecting surrounding property and farmland. For the piping failures, water flow from the initial pipes formed for significant periods before they collapse, but the flow rates are small compared with that of the much larger landslip mode. After failure, fragments of the collapsing wall block the breach and can considerably restrict the flood discharge. In some cases, the water pressure is able to push the obstructing material downstream and some minor flooding occurs, but in others cases the breach can remain blocked with little flooding occurring. A prototype risk framework is developed using the small database of the pre-computed flooding scenarios and key variables that affect inundation such as water level in the reservoir. This can be used to estimate inundation maps for as yet non-computed scenarios through interpolation and superposition techniques. The implementation of the risk framework is demonstrated by the estimation of inundation maps for two in-between non-computed reservoir levels. Inundation due to multiple breaches is also estimated by superposition of three single-breach scenarios. Results are compared against the simulated multiple breach. A preliminary implementation of this risk framework into a geographic information system is also described. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Cleary & Mahesh Prakash & Stuart Mead & Vincent Lemiale & Geoff Robinson & Fanghong Ye & Sida Ouyang & Xinming Tang, 2015. "A scenario-based risk framework for determining consequences of different failure modes of earth dams," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 1489-1530, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1489-1530
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1379-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1379-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-014-1379-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massimiliano Cannata & Roberto Marzocchi, 2012. "Two-dimensional dam break flooding simulation: a GIS-embedded approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(3), pages 1143-1159, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kabir, Golam & Balek, Ngandu Balekelayi Celestin & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2018. "Consequence-based framework for buried infrastructure systems: A Bayesian belief network model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 290-301.
    2. Jianjun Zhao & Hanyue Zhang & Changxin Yang & Lee Min Lee & Xiao Zhao & Qiyi Lai, 2020. "Experimental study of reservoir bank collapse in gravel soil under different slope gradients and water levels," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 102(1), pages 249-273, May.
    3. Diaa Sheishah & Tímea Kiss & Tibor Borza & Károly Fiala & Péter Kozák & Enas Abdelsamei & Csaba Tóth & Gyula Grenerczy & Dávid Gergely Páll & György Sipos, 2023. "Mapping subsurface defects and surface deformation along the artificial levee of the Lower Tisza River, Hungary," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1647-1671, June.
    4. Wei Ge & Zongkun Li & Wei Li & Meimei Wu & Juanjuan Li & Yipeng Pan, 2020. "Risk evaluation of dam-break environmental impacts based on the set pair analysis and cloud model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1641-1653, November.
    5. Miloš Milašinović & Damjan Ivetić & Milan Stojković & Dragan Savić, 2023. "Failure Conditions Assessment of Complex Water Systems Using Fuzzy Logic," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(3), pages 1153-1182, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. V. Timbadiya & K. M. Krishnamraju, 2023. "A 2D hydrodynamic model for river flood prediction in a coastal floodplain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1143-1165, January.
    2. Kawa Z. Abdulrahman & Mariwan R. Faris & Hekmat M. Ibrahim & Omed S. Q. Yousif & Alan Abubaker Ghafoor & Luqman S. Othman & Moses Karakouzian, 2022. "Hypothetical failure of the Khassa Chai dam and flood risk analysis for Kirkuk, Iraq," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(3), pages 1833-1851, September.
    3. Ruirui Sun & Xiaoling Wang & Zhengyin Zhou & Xuefei Ao & Xiaopei Sun & Mingrui Song, 2014. "Study of the comprehensive risk analysis of dam-break flooding based on the numerical simulation of flood routing. Part I: model development," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1547-1568, September.
    4. Monia Molinari & Massimiliano Cannata & Claudia Meisina, 2014. "r.massmov: an open-source landslide model for dynamic early warning systems," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(2), pages 1153-1179, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1489-1530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.