IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i12d10.1007_s11069-024-06631-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a standardised framework with universal core indicators for flood resilience assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Shiying Xu

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab
    Nanyang Technological University)

  • Hao Chen

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab)

  • Adrian Wing-Keung Law

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab
    Nanyang Technological University)

  • Feng Zhu

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab
    Nanyang Technological University)

  • Daniel Martini

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab
    Surbana Jurong Consultants Pte Ltd, Coastal Engineering Division)

  • Martin Lim

    (SJ-NTU Corporate Lab
    Surbana Jurong Consultants Pte Ltd, Coastal Engineering Division)

Abstract

Understanding the flood resilience of an area is an important task for decision-makers, practitioners, and community members. However, despite the wide acceptance of the need for resilience assessment in recent years, there has been no clear agreement on what flood resilience exactly constitutes and thus no consensus on the way in which it should be quantified. As such, this study aims to identify the most pivotal indicators to establish a standardised sustainable flood resilience framework (SFRF) for an overall measure of resilience before a flood event. The framework uses the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDG) indicators as a benchmark to establish a measurement structure that can be consistently implemented globally, using publicly sourced data. Users of the SFRF will be able to assess whether their target area has successfully achieved the conditions required for flood resilience and as a result, the associated UN SDG targets. A detailed review of 55 journal articles related to flood resilience assessment was first conducted to identify the most frequently used indicators globally across the different frameworks in the literature. A hybrid method using the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach combined with the analytic network process (ANP) was then adopted to rank the top indicators in terms of their importance in evaluating the flood resilience. Finally, two examples are provided to show how the SFRF established in this study can enable users to make a universally standardised assessment of the level of flood resilience for a specific area.

Suggested Citation

  • Shiying Xu & Hao Chen & Adrian Wing-Keung Law & Feng Zhu & Daniel Martini & Martin Lim, 2024. "Development of a standardised framework with universal core indicators for flood resilience assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(12), pages 10753-10772, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06631-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06631-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06631-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06631-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:12:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06631-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.