IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/68267.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brief communication: Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction – success or warning sign for Paris?

Author

Listed:
  • Mysiak, Jaroslav
  • Surminski, Swenja
  • Thieken, Annegret
  • Mechler, Reinhard
  • Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.

Abstract

In March 2015, a new international blueprint for disaster risk reduction (DRR) was adopted in Sendai, Japan, at the end of the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction (WCDRR, 14–18 March 2015). We review and discuss the agreed commitments and targets, as well as the negotiation leading the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and discuss briefly its implication for the later UN-led negotiations on sustainable development goals and climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Mysiak, Jaroslav & Surminski, Swenja & Thieken, Annegret & Mechler, Reinhard & Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H., 2016. "Brief communication: Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction – success or warning sign for Paris?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68267, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:68267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68267/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauw, Pieter & Brandi, Clara & Richerzhagen, Carmen & Bauer, Steffen & Schmole, Hanna, 2014. "Different perspectives on differentiated responsibilities: a state-of-the-art review of the notion of common but differentiated responsibilities in international negotiations," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiying Xu & Hao Chen & Adrian Wing-Keung Law & Feng Zhu & Daniel Martini & Martin Lim, 2024. "Development of a standardised framework with universal core indicators for flood resilience assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(12), pages 10753-10772, September.
    2. Donatella Porrini & Francesco Masi, 2021. "Managing climate change risk: the case of the Italian Churches," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2619-2637, February.
    3. Ren, Shan & Aldahri, Tahani & Liu, Weizao & Liang, Bin, 2021. "CO2 mineral sequestration by using blast furnace slag: From batch to continuous experiments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MacFeely Steve, 2017. "Measuring the Sustainable Development Goals: What does it mean for Ireland?," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 65(4), pages 41-71, December.
    2. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2017. "Rising powers and the provision of transnational public goods: conceptual considerations and features of South Africa as a case study," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Mariama Williams & Manuel F. Montes, 2016. "Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: Which Way Forward?," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 59(1), pages 114-120, June.
    4. Jaroslav Mysiak & Swenja Surminski & Annegret Thieken & Reinhard Mechler & Jeroen Aerts, 2015. "Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction – Success or Warning Sign for Paris?," Working Papers 2015.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Andreas Lange & Claudia Schwirplies, 2017. "(Un)fair Delegation: Exploring the Strategic Use of Equity Rules in International Climate Negotiations," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(3), pages 505-533, July.
    6. Steven R. Brechin & Maria I. Espinoza, 2017. "A case for further refinement of the Green Climate Fund’s 50:50 ratio climate change mitigation and adaptation allocation framework: toward a more targeted approach," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 311-320, June.
    7. Högl, Maximilian, 2018. "Enabling factors for cooperation in the climate negotiations: a comparative analysis of Copenhagen 2009 and Paris 2015," IDOS Discussion Papers 14/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Mbeva, Kennedy Liti & Pauw, Pieter, 2016. "Self-differentiation of countries’ responsibilities: addressing climate change through intended nationally determined contributions," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Axel Michaelowa & Katharina Michaelowa, 2015. "Do rapidly developing countries take up new responsibilities for climate change mitigation?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 499-510, December.
    10. Deborah Barros Leal Farias, 2023. "Country differentiation in the global environmental context: Who is ‘developing’ and according to what?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 253-269, September.
    11. Pieter Pauw & Kennedy Mbeva & Harro Asselt, 2019. "Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:68267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.