IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i11d10.1007_s11069-024-06592-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional-scale landslide modeling using machine learning and GIS: a case study for Idukki district, Kerala, India

Author

Listed:
  • Dhanya Madhu

    (Center for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham
    Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

  • G. K. Nithya

    (Center for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

  • S. Sreekala

    (Center for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

  • Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh

    (Center for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham)

Abstract

Globally, landslides impact in a site-specific and regional scale, and have affected 4.8 million human beings during1998–2017. Landslides, being a highly complex phenomenon involving real-time and near real-time interactions between hydrological, geomorphological, climatological as well as anthropological factors impacting large spatial areas, demand the development of regional-scale warning systems. Even though an extensive body of research already exists in the field of landslide early warning, the prediction of the actual location and the time of landslide initiation is still a major challenge. In the current study, we compare the performance of ten machine learning (ML) algorithms useful for landslide early warning. The current study is performed in the Idukki district of Kerala state in India. A database with landslide incidents is created using research literature, reports from the Geological Survey of India (GSI) as well as news articles. Landslide causative factors, as indicated by previous literature, have been mapped using Geographic Information System (GIS). The different ML algorithms considered for this study are Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbor, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and its different kernel functions such as linear, Polynomial, Gaussian and ensemble algorithms namely Random Forest and AdaBoost. The performance of the different algorithms is quantified and compared utilizing established statistical metrics such as G-Mean, F1 score, and ROC-AUC score. Our results follow the similar ones in literature where the machine learning techniques provide an efficient tool for landslide susceptibility mapping. All the algorithms considered produce reasonable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhanya Madhu & G. K. Nithya & S. Sreekala & Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh, 2024. "Regional-scale landslide modeling using machine learning and GIS: a case study for Idukki district, Kerala, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 9935-9956, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06592-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06592-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06592-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06592-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Landslide; Machine learning; Geoscience data; F1 score; G-mean; AUC score;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:11:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06592-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.