IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v118y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-06092-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of landslide inventory timespan and data selection on slope unit-based susceptibility models

Author

Listed:
  • S. Rolain

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

  • M. Alvioli

    (Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche)

  • Q. D. Nguyen

    (Phenikaa University)

  • T. L. Nguyen

    (Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources (VIGMR), Economic Geology, Mineral Materials Department)

  • L. Jacobs

    (KU Leuven
    University of Amsterdam)

  • M. Kervyn

    (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)

Abstract

Key advantages of modelling landslide susceptibility at the level of slope units—homogeneous landscape elements bound by drainage and divide lines—instead of grid cells have recently been highlighted. However, there has been limited investigation into the sensitivity of a slope unit landslide susceptibility approach to the characteristics of the landslide inventory used for calibration and the modelling approach. Here, a slope unit landslide susceptibility assessment is conducted for the Da Bac district, Vietnam, based on a multi-temporal landslide inventory, using logistic regression and support vector machine classification algorithms and a set of environmental and anthropogenic controlling factors. A landslide inventory for the period 2013–2020 was created using Google Earth© imagery, including large landslide events in 2018 and 2019. Results highlight that models calibrated from a sample of a single-year inventory and validated with a later year have the same accuracy as those calibrated with a random sample of the entire inventory. Regardless of the calibration data used, the support vector machine algorithm consistently outperforms logistic regression. This is evident from the lower standard deviation of susceptibility values observed when compared to those obtained using logistic regression. The landslide susceptibility models for slope units remain reliable, even when calibrated using a temporally short and event-specific landslide inventory.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Rolain & M. Alvioli & Q. D. Nguyen & T. L. Nguyen & L. Jacobs & M. Kervyn, 2023. "Influence of landslide inventory timespan and data selection on slope unit-based susceptibility models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2227-2244, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:118:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06092-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-06092-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-06092-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-06092-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dieu Bui & Owe Lofman & Inge Revhaug & Oystein Dick, 2011. "Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(3), pages 1413-1444, December.
    2. Thomas Stanley & Dalia B. Kirschbaum, 2017. "A heuristic approach to global landslide susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(1), pages 145-164, May.
    3. Iris Bostjančić & Marina Filipović & Vlatko Gulam & Davor Pollak, 2021. "Regional-Scale Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Limited LiDAR-Based Landslide Inventories for Sisak-Moslavina County, Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Shuai Zhao & Zhou Zhao, 2021. "A Comparative Study of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SVM and PSO-SVM Models Based on Grid and Slope Units," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chonghao Zhu & Jianjing Zhang & Yang Liu & Donghua Ma & Mengfang Li & Bo Xiang, 2020. "Comparison of GA-BP and PSO-BP neural network models with initial BP model for rainfall-induced landslides risk assessment in regional scale: a case study in Sichuan, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 173-204, January.
    2. Chi Yang & Jinghan Wang & Shuyi Li & Ruihan Xiong & Xiaobo Li & Lin Gao & Xu Guo & Chuanming Ma & Hanxiang Xiong & Yang Qiu, 2024. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Future Prediction with Land Use Change and Urbanization towards Sustainable Development: The Case of the Li River Valley in Yongding, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Nisar Ali Shah & Muhammad Shafique & Muhammad Ishfaq & Kamil Faisal & Mark Van der Meijde, 2023. "Integrated Approach for Landslide Risk Assessment Using Geoinformation Tools and Field Data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Xiaoqing Zhao & Junwei Pu & Xingyou Wang & Junxu Chen & Liang Emlyn Yang & Zexian Gu, 2018. "Land-Use Spatio-Temporal Change and Its Driving Factors in an Artificial Forest Area in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Bo Cao & Qingyi Li & Yuhang Zhu, 2022. "Comparison of Effects between Different Weight Calculation Methods for Improving Regional Landslide Susceptibility—A Case Study from Xingshan County of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    7. Moung-Jin Lee & Wonkyong Song & Saro Lee, 2015. "Habitat Mapping of the Leopard Cat ( Prionailurus bengalensis ) in South Korea Using GIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. L. Lombardo & M. Cama & C. Conoscenti & M. Märker & E. Rotigliano, 2015. "Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messi," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1621-1648, December.
    9. Khabat Khosravi & Ebrahim Nohani & Edris Maroufinia & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2016. "A GIS-based flood susceptibility assessment and its mapping in Iran: a comparison between frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence bivariate statistical models with multi-criteria decision-making techn," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 947-987, September.
    10. Okoli Jude Emeka & Haslinda Nahazanan & Bahareh Kalantar & Zailani Khuzaimah & Ojogbane Success Sani, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effect of Hydroseeded Vegetation for Slope Reinforcement," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Jonmenjoy Barman & Brototi Biswas & K. Srinivasa Rao, 2024. "A hybrid integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiobjective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) for landslide susceptibility zonation of Aizawl, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(9), pages 8571-8596, July.
    12. Fhatuwani Sengani & François Mulenga, 2020. "Application of Limit Equilibrium Analysis and Numerical Modeling in a Case of Slope Instability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-33, October.
    13. Amin Hosseinpoor Milaghardan & Rahim Ali Abbaspour & Mina Khalesian, 2020. "Evaluation of the effects of uncertainty on the predictions of landslide occurrences using the Shannon entropy theory and Dempster–Shafer theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(1), pages 49-67, January.
    14. Mohammad Mehrabi, 2022. "Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 901-937, March.
    15. Christos Polykretis & Christos Chalkias, 2018. "Comparison and evaluation of landslide susceptibility maps obtained from weight of evidence, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 249-274, August.
    16. Amit Bera & Bhabani Prasad Mukhopadhyay & Debasish Das, 2019. "Landslide hazard zonation mapping using multi-criteria analysis with the help of GIS techniques: a case study from Eastern Himalayas, Namchi, South Sikkim," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(2), pages 935-959, March.
    17. Chen Cao & Peihua Xu & Yihong Wang & Jianping Chen & Lianjing Zheng & Cencen Niu, 2016. "Flash Flood Hazard Susceptibility Mapping Using Frequency Ratio and Statistical Index Methods in Coalmine Subsidence Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Saeed Alqadhi & Hoang Thi Hang & Javed Mallick & Abdullah Faiz Saeed Al Asmari, 2024. "Evaluating landslide susceptibility and landscape changes due to road expansion using optimized machine learning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 11713-11741, October.
    19. Yulin Chen & Enze Chen & Jun Zhang & Jingxuan Zhu & Yuanyuan Xiao & Qiang Dai, 2023. "Investigation of Model Uncertainty in Rainfall-Induced Landslide Prediction under Changing Climate Conditions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Michele Marconi & Beatrice Gatto & Michele Magni & Fausto Marincioni, 2016. "A rapid method for flood susceptibility mapping in two districts of Phatthalung Province (Thailand): present and projected conditions for 2050," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 329-346, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:118:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-06092-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.