IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4416-d1400305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Future Prediction with Land Use Change and Urbanization towards Sustainable Development: The Case of the Li River Valley in Yongding, China

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Yang

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Jinghan Wang

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Shuyi Li

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ruihan Xiong

    (State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430078, China)

  • Xiaobo Li

    (Fifth Geological Brigade of Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration and Development, Tai’an 271000, China)

  • Lin Gao

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xu Guo

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Chuanming Ma

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hanxiang Xiong

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yang Qiu

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The land use change (LUC) and urbanization caused by human activities have markedly increased the occurrence of landslides, presenting significant challenges in accurately predicting landslide susceptibility despite decades of model advancements. This study, focusing on the Li River Valley (LRV) within the Yongding District, China, employs two common models, namely an analytic hierarchy process–comprehensive index (AHP-CI) model and a logistic regression (LR) model to assess landslide susceptibility (LS). The AHP-CI model is empirically based, with the advantage of being constructible and applicable at various scales without a dataset, though it remains highly subjective. The LR model is a statistical model that requires a training set. The two models represent heuristic and statistical approaches, respectively, to assessing LS. Meanwhile, the basic geological and environmental conditions are considered in the AHP-CI model, while the LR model accounts for the conditions of LUC and urbanization. The results of the multicollinearity diagnostics reflect the rationality of the predisposing factor selection (1.131 < VIF < 4.441). The findings reveal that the AHP-CI model underperforms in LUC and urbanization conditions (AUROC = 0.645, 0.628, and 0.667 for different validation datasets). However, when all the time-varying human activity predisposing factors are considered, the LR model (AUROC = 0.852) performs significantly better under the conditions of solely considering 2010 (AUROC = 0.744) and 2020 (AUROC = 0.810). The CA–Markov model was employed to project the future land use for the short-term (2025), mid-term (2030), and long-term (2040) planning periods. Based on these projections, maps of future LS were created. Importantly, this paper discussed the relationships between landslide management and regional sustainable development under the framework of the UN SDGs, which are relevant to Goal 1, Goal 11, Goal 13, and Goal 15. Finally, this study highlights the importance of integrating strategic land planning, reforestation efforts, and a thorough assessment of human impact predisposing factors with SDG-aligned LS predictions, advocating for a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder strategy to promote sustainable landslide mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Yang & Jinghan Wang & Shuyi Li & Ruihan Xiong & Xiaobo Li & Lin Gao & Xu Guo & Chuanming Ma & Hanxiang Xiong & Yang Qiu, 2024. "Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Future Prediction with Land Use Change and Urbanization towards Sustainable Development: The Case of the Li River Valley in Yongding, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4416-:d:1400305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4416/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4416/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4416-:d:1400305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.