IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v115y2023i2d10.1007_s11069-022-05584-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal flood susceptibility model based on performance comparisons of LR, EGB, and RF algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed M. Youssef

    (Sohag University
    Saudi Geological Survey)

  • Ali M. Mahdi

    (South Valley University)

  • Hamid Reza Pourghasemi

    (Shiraz University)

Abstract

Wadi El-Matulla, located in the eastern desert of Egypt, is the most important water basin. The Qift–Qusayr highway (west–east direction) and the Cairo–Aswan eastern desert highway (north–south direction) pass through the watershed. Many urban areas (villages and industrial areas) and agricultural lands are located at the outlet of these basins. In addition, the basin has promising potential for future economic and urban development as it is located within the Golden Triangle (governmental megaproject). The current study investigates flood hazard modeling and its impact on the area. To determine the optimal flood susceptibility mapping algorithm, performance comparisons of three techniques were conducted: logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (EGB), and random forest (RF). Remote sensing, topographic, geologic, and meteorological data were used with the help of field visits to provide the spatial and inventory database required by the models. The performance and reliability of the predictions of the proposed models were evaluated using five statistical indices: receiver operating characteristic–area under the curve, overall accuracy (OAC), kappa index, root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The performance of the models showed that the values of ROC (93, 86 and 80%), OAC (88, 82 and 76%), kappa index (0.85, 0.75 and 0.51), RMSE (0.34, 0.42 and 0.49) and MAE (0.12, 0.18 and 0.24) for RF, EGB, and LR, respectively. Based on AUC values, RF and EGB models provide excellent and very good prediction for flood susceptibility. Our results show that RF is the optimal algorithm for flood susceptibility mapping, followed by EGB and LR. Consequently, the predictive power of RF model is quite good and the flood susceptibility map was classified into five classes, namely very low (51.7%), low (23.7%), moderate (16.2%), high (7.1%), and very high (1.3%). Ultimately, the RF model was verified using sentinel-1 imagery for real floods in 2016 and 2021, and it provides good agreement. The optimal model could be useful for decision makers and planners to protect existing facilities and plan future projects in non-flood-prone areas. Accordingly, the most suitable areas for future development need to be distributed mainly in the low and very low flood hazard areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed M. Youssef & Ali M. Mahdi & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2023. "Optimal flood susceptibility model based on performance comparisons of LR, EGB, and RF algorithms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1071-1096, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:115:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05584-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05584-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05584-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05584-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alaa M. Al-Abadi & Noor A. Al-Najar, 2020. "Comparative assessment of bivariate, multivariate and machine learning models for mapping flood proneness," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(2), pages 461-491, January.
    2. Johnny Douvinet & Marco Wiel & Daniel Delahaye & Etienne Cossart, 2015. "A flash flood hazard assessment in dry valleys (northern France) by cellular automata modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 2905-2929, February.
    3. Eslam Satarzadeh & Amirpouya Sarraf & Hooman Hajikandi & Mohammad Sadegh Sadeghian, 2022. "Flood hazard mapping in western Iran: assessment of deep learning vis-à-vis machine learning models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1355-1373, March.
    4. Soyoung Park & Se-Yeong Hamm & Jinsoo Kim, 2019. "Performance Evaluation of the GIS-Based Data-Mining Techniques Decision Tree, Random Forest, and Rotation Forest for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Hassan Abedi Gheshlaghi & Dieu Tien Bui, 2021. "An integrated approach of GIS and hybrid intelligence techniques applied for flood risk modeling," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(3), pages 485-516, February.
    6. Chinh Luu & Quynh Duy Bui & Romulus Costache & Luan Thanh Nguyen & Thu Thuy Nguyen & Tran Phong & Hiep Le & Binh Thai Pham, 2021. "Flood-prone area mapping using machine learning techniques: a case study of Quang Binh province, Vietnam," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3229-3251, September.
    7. Martin Kabenge & Joshua Elaru & Hongtao Wang & Fengting Li, 2017. "Characterizing flood hazard risk in data-scarce areas, using a remote sensing and GIS-based flood hazard index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1369-1387, December.
    8. Lin Lin & Zening Wu & Qiuhua Liang, 2019. "Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 455-475, June.
    9. Abdulwaheed Tella & Abdul-Lateef Balogun, 2020. "Ensemble fuzzy MCDM for spatial assessment of flood susceptibility in Ibadan, Nigeria," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2277-2306, December.
    10. M. M. Yagoub & Aishah A. Alsereidi & Elfadil A. Mohamed & Punitha Periyasamy & Reem Alameri & Salama Aldarmaki & Yaqein Alhashmi, 2020. "Newspapers as a validation proxy for GIS modeling in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates: identifying flood-prone areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 111-141, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangang Cao & Pengfei Li & Song Ming, 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction-Based Maintenance Decision Model for Stochastic Deterioration Equipment under Data-Driven," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Mohammed Sarfaraz Gani Adnan & Ashraf Dewan & Khatun E. Zannat & Abu Yousuf Md Abdullah, 2019. "The use of watershed geomorphic data in flash flood susceptibility zoning: a case study of the Karnaphuli and Sangu river basins of Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(1), pages 425-448, October.
    3. Idris Bello Yamusa & Mohd Suhaili Ismail & Abdulwaheed Tella, 2022. "Highway Proneness Appraisal to Landslides along Taiping to Ipoh Segment Malaysia, Using MCDM and GIS Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Sukanta Malakar & Abhishek K. Rai & Arun K. Gupta, 2023. "Earthquake risk mapping in the Himalayas by integrated analytical hierarchy process, entropy with neural network," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 951-975, March.
    5. Yongwei Li & Xianmin Wang & Hang Mao, 2020. "Influence of human activity on landslide susceptibility development in the Three Gorges area," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2115-2151, December.
    6. Alaa Ahmed & Guna Hewa & Abdullah Alrajhi, 2021. "Flood susceptibility mapping using a geomorphometric approach in South Australian basins," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 629-653, March.
    7. Gabriela Reis & Francisco Assis Souza Filho & Donald Robert Nelson & Renan Vieira Rocha & Samiria Maria Oliveira Silva, 2020. "Development of a drought vulnerability index using MCDM and GIS: study case in São Paulo and Ceará, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1781-1799, November.
    8. Mateusz Hämmerling & Joanna Kocięcka & Stanisław Zaborowski, 2021. "AHP as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydrotechnical Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Preeti Ramkar & Sanjaykumar M. Yadav, 2021. "Flood risk index in data-scarce river basins using the AHP and GIS approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 1119-1140, October.
    10. Jihye Han & Jinsoo Kim & Soyoung Park & Sanghun Son & Minji Ryu, 2020. "Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping of Gyeongju, South Korea Using Frequency Ratio, Decision Tree, and Random Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Peyman Yariyan & Saeid Janizadeh & Tran Phong & Huu Duy Nguyen & Romulus Costache & Hiep Le & Binh Thai Pham & Biswajeet Pradhan & John P. Tiefenbacher, 2020. "Improvement of Best First Decision Trees Using Bagging and Dagging Ensembles for Flood Probability Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 3037-3053, July.
    12. Chengwei Lu & Jianzhong Zhou & Zhongzheng He & Shuai Yuan, 2018. "Evaluating typical flood risks in Yangtze River Economic Belt: application of a flood risk mapping framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1187-1210, December.
    13. Langping Li & Hengxing Lan, 2020. "Integration of Spatial Probability and Size in Slope-Unit-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Yongling Zhang & Miao Zhou & Nana Kong & Xin Li & Xiaobing Zhou, 2022. "Evaluation of Emergency Response Capacity of Urban Pluvial Flooding Public Service Based on Scenario Simulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Vijendra Kumar & Hazi Md. Azamathulla & Kul Vaibhav Sharma & Darshan J. Mehta & Kiran Tota Maharaj, 2023. "The State of the Art in Deep Learning Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects: A Comprehensive Review of Flood Forecasting and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, July.
    16. Ai Zhang, 2021. "Influence of data mining technology in information analysis of human resource management on macroscopic economic management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Jinping Tong & Fei Gao & Hui Liu & Jing Huang & Gaofeng Liu & Hanyue Zhang & Qiong Duan, 2023. "A Study on Identification of Urban Waterlogging Risk Factors Based on Satellite Image Semantic Segmentation and XGBoost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Qinge Peng & Xingnian Liu & Er Huang & Kejun Yang, 2019. "Experimental study on the influence of vegetation on the slope flow concentration time," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(2), pages 751-763, September.
    19. Eseosa Halima Ighile & Hiroaki Shirakawa & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2022. "Application of GIS and Machine Learning to Predict Flood Areas in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-33, April.
    20. Bosco Bwambale & Martine Nyeko & John Sekajugo & Matthieu Kervyn, 2022. "The essential contribution of indigenous knowledge to understanding natural hazards and disaster risk: historical evidence from the Rwenzori (Uganda)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1847-1867, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:115:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05584-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.