IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v104y2020i2d10.1007_s11069-020-04247-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a drought vulnerability index using MCDM and GIS: study case in São Paulo and Ceará, Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Reis

    (Federal University of Ceará)

  • Francisco Assis Souza Filho

    (Federal University of Ceará)

  • Donald Robert Nelson

    (University of Georgia)

  • Renan Vieira Rocha

    (Federal University of Ceará)

  • Samiria Maria Oliveira Silva

    (Federal University of Ceará)

Abstract

Although climate change vulnerability research in general has increased over the last decade, Latin American countries have more directed more limited efforts toward vulnerability and its social aspects. To respond to this gap, the authors developed a method to quantify drought vulnerability, which is key climate risk in Brazil. The iSECA model uses MCDM techniques to calculate vulnerability indexes by applying weighting schemes to indicators that represent climatological, social, economic, and water management factors. GIS software was used to classify and to map vulnerability. The model output is a drought vulnerability index, displayed through maps and graphs, including a vulnerability triangle and frequency curves. The results provide a clear understanding for water managers and non-specialists and can serve as an indispensable tool for water management in drought-prone regions. A sensitivity analysis confirms the model's robustness. iSECA was applied to Ceará and São Paulo, two states with distinct climatological and socio-economic contexts. The application demonstrated how the model works well across different spatial scales within these different contexts. The study found that in São Paulo more than 30 million people are living with very high vulnerability to drought primarily due to water management characteristics. However, in Fortaleza, Ceará, the climatic factors are the most critical. Even the state’s robust interbasin water infrastructure system does not significantly reduce the drought risk. The ability to identify vulnerability hotspots and the underlying characteristics that influence the rankings provides the necessary input of policy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Reis & Francisco Assis Souza Filho & Donald Robert Nelson & Renan Vieira Rocha & Samiria Maria Oliveira Silva, 2020. "Development of a drought vulnerability index using MCDM and GIS: study case in São Paulo and Ceará, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1781-1799, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04247-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04247-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04247-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04247-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Thomas & R. K. Jaiswal & Ravi Galkate & P. C. Nayak & N. C. Ghosh, 2016. "Drought indicators-based integrated assessment of drought vulnerability: a case study of Bundelkhand droughts in central India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(3), pages 1627-1652, April.
    2. G. W. Pienaar & D. A. Hughes, 2017. "Linking Hydrological Uncertainty with Equitable Allocation for Water Resources Decision-Making," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(1), pages 269-282, January.
    3. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid, 2018. "Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? An experimental comparative study of three methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 462-471.
    4. Kadriye Burcu Yavuz Kumlu & Şule Tüdeş, 2019. "Determination of earthquake-risky areas in Yalova City Center (Marmara region, Turkey) using GIS-based multicriteria decision-making techniques (analytical hierarchy process and technique for order pr," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(3), pages 999-1018, April.
    5. Bing Wang & Su-Yan Pan & Ruo-Yu Ke & Ke Wang & Yi-Ming Wei, 2014. "An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(3), pages 1649-1666, December.
    6. Jesús Vargas & Pilar Paneque, 2017. "Erratum to: Methodology for the analysis of causes of drought vulnerability on the River Basin scale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 623-623, November.
    7. Yeonjoo Kim & Eun-Sung Chung, 2013. "Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 301-315, November.
    8. Raoof Mostafazadeh & Amir Sadoddin & Abdolreza Bahremand & Vahed Berdi Sheikh & Arash Zare Garizi, 2017. "Scenario analysis of flood control structures using a multi-criteria decision-making technique in Northeast Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1827-1846, July.
    9. Lin Lin & Zening Wu & Qiuhua Liang, 2019. "Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 455-475, June.
    10. Kenneth Hewitt, 2013. "Environmental disasters in social context: toward a preventive and precautionary approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(1), pages 3-14, March.
    11. Jesús Vargas & Pilar Paneque, 2017. "Methodology for the analysis of causes of drought vulnerability on the River Basin scale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(2), pages 609-621, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luiz Martins Araújo Júnior & Francisco de Assis Souza Filho & Guilherme Alencar Barreto & Daniel Antônio Camelo Cid & João Dehon Araújo Pontes Filho, 2023. "A drought risk management system for early drought alert and proactive actions in large semi-arid areas," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2297-2324, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús Vargas & Pilar Paneque, 2019. "Challenges for the Integration of Water Resource and Drought-Risk Management in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Huifang Sun & Yaoguo Dang & Wenxin Mao, 2019. "Identifying key factors of regional agricultural drought vulnerability using a panel data grey combined method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(2), pages 621-642, September.
    3. Matteo Maccanti & Romina D’Ascanio & Federica Di Pietrantonio & Michela Marchi & Jesús Vargas Molina & Riccardo Maria Pulselli & Andrea Poldrugovac & Diane Schembri Cassar & Lorenzo Barbieri & Josefin, 2023. "Learning-by-Doing Methodology towards Urban Decarbonisation: An Application in Valletta (Malta)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    5. Aleksandras KRYLOVAS & Natalja KOSAREVA & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS, 2016. "Statistical Analysis of KEMIRA Type Weights Balancing Methods," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 19-39, September.
    6. Gallego-Losada, María-Jesús & Montero-Navarro, Antonio & García-Abajo, Elisa & Gallego-Losada, Rocío, 2023. "Digital financial inclusion. Visualizing the academic literature," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Almat Kabyl & Ming Yang & Dhawal Shah & Arshad Ahmad, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Accidental Oil Spills in Ice-Infested Waters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Petros Xepapadeas & Kostas Douvis & Ioannis Kapsomenakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Christos Zerefos, 2024. "Assessing the Link between Wildfires, Vulnerability, and Climate Change: Insights from the Regions of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Jane Musole Kwenye & Xiaoting Hou Jones & Alan Renwick, 2023. "Understanding Land-Use Trade-off Decision Making Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process: Insights from Agricultural Land Managers in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael & Aleixandre-Tudó, José Luis & Castelló-Cogollos, Lourdes & Aleixandre, José Luis, 2018. "Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 293-302.
    12. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Vivek Warke & Satish Kumar & Arunkumar Bongale & Ketan Kotecha, 2021. "Sustainable Development of Smart Manufacturing Driven by the Digital Twin Framework: A Statistical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-49, September.
    14. Calabrese, Armando & Costa, Roberta & Levialdi, Nathan & Menichini, Tamara, 2019. "Integrating sustainability into strategic decision-making: A fuzzy AHP method for the selection of relevant sustainability issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 155-168.
    15. Bing Wang & Hua-Nan Li & Xiao-Chen Yuan & Zhen-Ming Sun, 2017. "Energy Poverty in China: A Dynamic Analysis Based on a Hybrid Panel Data Decision Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Alan Renwick & Robyn Dynes & Paul Johnstone & Warren King & Lania Holt & Jemma Penelope, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities for Land Use Transformation: Insights from the Central Plains Water Scheme in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Hasrul Hazman Hasan & Siti Fatin Mohd Razali & Nur Shazwani Muhammad & Asmadi Ahmad, 2022. "Modified Hydrological Drought Risk Assessment Based on Spatial and Temporal Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    18. Long Ho & Peter Goethals, 2020. "Research hotspots and current challenges of lakes and reservoirs: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 603-631, July.
    19. Gerarda Fattoruso & Salvatore Scognamiglio & Antonio Violi, 2022. "A New Dynamic and Perspective Parsimonious AHP Model for Improving Industrial Frameworks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Divya Saini & Omvir Singh & Tejpal Sharma & Pankaj Bhardwaj, 2022. "Geoinformatics and analytic hierarchy process based drought vulnerability assessment over a dryland ecosystem of north-western India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1427-1454, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Vulnerability; Drought; MCDM; GIS;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04247-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.