IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v64y2006i2p237-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model: characterisation and convergence

Author

Listed:
  • Gino Favero
  • Tiziano Vargiolu

Abstract

In this paper we study the dependence on the loss function of the strategy, which minimises the expected shortfall risk when dealing with a financial contingent claim in the particular situation of a binomial model. After having characterised the optimal strategies in the particular cases when the loss function is concave, linear or strictly convex, we analyse how optimal strategies change when we approximate a loss function with a sequence of suitable loss functions. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Gino Favero & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2006. "Shortfall risk minimising strategies in the binomial model: characterisation and convergence," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 64(2), pages 237-253, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:64:y:2006:i:2:p:237-253
    DOI: 10.1007/s00186-006-0083-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00186-006-0083-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00186-006-0083-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Karatzas & Jaksa Cvitanic, 1999. "On dynamic measures of risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 451-482.
    2. Elyès Jouini & Clotilde Napp, 2004. "Convergence of utility functions and convergence of optimal strategies," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 133-144, January.
    3. Gino Favero, 2001. "Shortfall risk minimization under model uncertainty in the binomial case: adaptive and robust approaches," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 53(3), pages 493-503, July.
    4. Marco Schulmerich & Siegfried Trautmann, 2003. "Local Expected Shortfall-Hedging in Discrete Time," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 75-102.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/355 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hans Föllmer & Alexander Schied, 2002. "Convex measures of risk and trading constraints," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 429-447.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Bäuerle & André Mundt, 2009. "Dynamic mean-risk optimization in a binomial model," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 70(2), pages 219-239, October.
    2. Peter Lindberg, 2010. "Optimal partial hedging in a discrete-time market as a knapsack problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 72(3), pages 433-451, December.
    3. Barbara Trivellato, 2009. "Replication and shortfall risk in a binomial model with transaction costs," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(1), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Jungmin Choi & Mattias Jonsson, 2009. "Partial Hedging in Financial Markets with a Large Agent," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 331-346.
    5. Peter G. Lindberg, 2009. "Optimal partial hedging in a discrete-time market as a knapsack problem," Papers 0910.5101, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riedel, Frank, 2004. "Dynamic coherent risk measures," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 185-200, August.
    2. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Žitković, 2010. "Partial equilibria with convex capital requirements: existence, uniqueness and stability," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 107-135, January.
    3. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Zhao Zhang, 2010. "Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices and their Applications to Finance," Papers 1010.4339, arXiv.org, revised May 2011.
    4. Robert J. Elliott & Tak Kuen Siu, 2009. "Robust Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Markovian Regime-switching Model," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 145-157, June.
    5. Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2006. "Risk measures via g-expectations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 19-34, August.
    6. Leonel Pérez-Hernández, 2005. "On the Existence of Efficient Hedge for an American Contingent Claim: Discrete Time Market," Department of Economics and Finance Working Papers EC200505, Universidad de Guanajuato, Department of Economics and Finance.
    7. Sabrina Mulinacci, 2011. "The efficient hedging problem for American options," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 365-397, June.
    8. Mingxin Xu, 2006. "Risk measure pricing and hedging in incomplete markets," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 51-71, January.
    9. Giannopoulos, Kostas & Tunaru, Radu, 2005. "Coherent risk measures under filtered historical simulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 979-996, April.
    10. Kerem Ugurlu, 2019. "Robust Utility Maximization with Drift and Volatility Uncertainty," Papers 1909.05335, arXiv.org.
    11. Peter Lindberg, 2012. "Optimal partial hedging of an American option: shifting the focus to the expiration date," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 221-243, June.
    12. Pietro Siorpaes, 2015. "Optimal investment and price dependence in a semi-static market," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 161-187, January.
    13. Ji, Ronglin & Shi, Xuejun & Wang, Shijie & Zhou, Jinming, 2019. "Dynamic risk measures for processes via backward stochastic differential equations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 43-50.
    14. Claus, Matthias, 2022. "Existence of solutions for a class of bilevel stochastic linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 542-549.
    15. Shuo Gong & Yijun Hu & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "Risk measurement of joint risk of portfolios: a liquidity shortfall aspect," Papers 2212.04848, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    16. Francesca Biagini & Alessandro Doldi & Jean-Pierre Fouque & Marco Frittelli & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2023. "Collective Arbitrage and the Value of Cooperation," Papers 2306.11599, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    17. Cosimo Munari, 2020. "Multi-utility representations of incomplete preferences induced by set-valued risk measures," Papers 2009.04151, arXiv.org.
    18. Qian Lin & Frank Riedel, 2021. "Optimal consumption and portfolio choice with ambiguous interest rates and volatility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(3), pages 1189-1202, April.
    19. Zachary Feinstein & Birgit Rudloff, 2018. "Scalar multivariate risk measures with a single eligible asset," Papers 1807.10694, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    20. Yanhong Chen & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Set-valued dynamic risk measures for processes and for vectors," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 505-533, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:64:y:2006:i:2:p:237-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.