IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/manrev/v74y2024i1d10.1007_s11301-022-00297-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonprofit capacity and social performance: mapping the field and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Norraini Nordin

    (Management & Science University)

  • Ali Khatibi

    (Management & Science University)

  • S. M. Ferdous Azam

    (Management & Science University)

Abstract

Nonprofit organizations are critical actors in the Sustainable Development Goals as they provide a wide range of social services to the community and contribute to creating a sustainable future. They must compete for funding or government contracts by showing high social performance. Among the top factors influencing social performance is capacity, and it has received considerable attention in public and nonprofit literature. Capacity refers to the resources, capabilities, and practices required to perform their functions to achieve the social mission and high social performance. However, studies concerning capacity linked with social performance remain controversial. Understanding the linkage between capacity and social performance is relevant to funders, board directors, and management as it helps them enhance organizational performance. This research aims to assess the flow of knowledge in the study field and make recommendations for future research. The study focuses on capacity of nonprofits and thoroughly reviews the literature using complementary bibliometric analysis: co-occurrence analysis of keywords, sources, and authors and bibliographic coupling analysis of documents. We conduct a systematic analysis of peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1955 and 2022. Seven significant themes emerge among the most prominent researchers: (1) the link between capacity and social performance; (2) dimensions of capacity; (3) human resource capacity linked with social performance: (4) financial capacity linked with social performance; (5) capacity building linked with social performance; (6) collaboration and capacity; and (7) factors affecting capacity–social performance. The literature on nonprofits is determined to have inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between capacity and social performance. Research on various factors influencing capacity–social performance relationships is also scarce. This article highlights major principles in the discipline and identifies significant theoretical gaps in the body of knowledge. It also outlines the conceptual foundation for the study and makes recommendations for further research. From a managerial standpoint, the study sheds light on whether capacity is linked to higher performance levels and provides policymakers with guidelines on the implications of capacity building and collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Norraini Nordin & Ali Khatibi & S. M. Ferdous Azam, 2024. "Nonprofit capacity and social performance: mapping the field and future directions," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 171-225, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:74:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11301-022-00297-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11301-022-00297-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörn H. Block & Christian Fisch, 2020. "Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 307-312, August.
    2. Joern H. Block & Christian O. Fisch & Mirjam van Praag, 2017. "The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 61-95, January.
    3. Pamela Wicker & Christoph Breuer, 2011. "Scarcity of resources in German non-profit sport clubs," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 188-201, April.
    4. Divya Chandrasekhar & Ivis García & Sayma Khajehei, 2022. "Recovery Capacity of Small Nonprofits in Post-2017 Hurricane Puerto Rico," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(2), pages 206-219, April.
    5. Nicole S. Hutton & Steven W. Mumford & Marina Saitgalina & Juita-Elena (Wie) Yusuf & Joshua G. Behr & Rafael Diaz & John J. Kiefer, 2021. "Nonprofit Capacity to Manage Hurricane-Pandemic Threat: Local and National Perspectives on Resilience during COVID-19," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(11-12), pages 984-993, September.
    6. Svensson, Per G. & Hambrick, Marion E., 2016. "“Pick and choose our battles” – Understanding organizational capacity in a sport for development and peace organization," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 120-132.
    7. Cherrie Yang & Deryl Northcott, 2019. "Together we measure: Improving public service outcomes via the co-production of performance measurement," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 253-261, May.
    8. Youngkeun Choi & Sug-in Chang & Sung-Jun Youn, 2021. "The effect of knowledge absorptive capacity on social ventures’ performance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1929032-192, January.
    9. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    10. Ebrahim, Alnoor, 2003. "Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 813-829, May.
    11. Morgan Miles & Martie-Louise Verreynne & Belinda Luke, 2014. "Social Enterprises and the Performance Advantages of a Vincentian Marketing Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(4), pages 549-556, September.
    12. Lall, Saurabh Ajay, 2017. "Measuring to Improve Versus Measuring to Prove: Understanding the Adoption of Social Performance Measurement Practices in Nascent Social Enterprises," SocArXiv 8wa5c, Center for Open Science.
    13. Carolien Jeanette Aantjes & Dave Burrows & Russell Armstrong, 2022. "Capacity development in pursuit of social change: an examination of processes and outcomes," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 536-550, May.
    14. Norman Chivasa, 2022. "Reflections on Peacebuilding Constructs in Seke District, Zimbabwe," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    15. Chen, Hsing Hung & Lee, Amy H I & Chen, Jack, 2017. "The relationship between innovation and performance in special nonprofit firms: Social and cooperative agrifood firms," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 587-602, July.
    16. Mara Balestrini & Alexander Kotsev & Marisa Ponti & Sven Schade, 2021. "Collaboration matters: capacity building, up-scaling, spreading, and sustainability in citizen-generated data projects," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Sumiyana & Wivaqussaniyyah & Muhadjir Darwin & Agus Heruanto Hadna, 2022. "Partnership building between NGOs and Indonesian local governments: a case study of integrative leadership immersing itself in innovativeness," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 49(7), pages 1029-1048, March.
    18. Nikita Singh & Syanda Alpheous Mthuli, 2021. "The Big Picture of Non-Profit Organisational Sustainability: a Qualitative System Dynamics Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 229-249, June.
    19. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1956. "General Systems Theory--The Skeleton of Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 197-208, April.
    20. Emmanuel Kumi, 2022. "Domestic resource mobilisation strategies of national non‐governmental organisations in Ghana," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2), pages 109-127, May.
    21. Léna D’Ostie-Racinea & Christian Dagenais & Valéry Ridde, 2021. "Examining Conditions that Influence Evaluation use within a Humanitarian Non-Governmental Organization in Burkina Faso (West Africa)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-35, February.
    22. Sobeck, Joanne & Agius, Elizabeth, 2007. "Organizational capacity building: Addressing a research and practice gap," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 237-246, August.
    23. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Farooq Rehan, 2020. "Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 591-627, November.
    24. Ludvig, Alice & Wilding, Maria & Thorogood, Adam & Weiss, Gerhard, 2018. "Social innovation in the Welsh Woodlands: Community based forestry as collective third-sector engagement," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 18-25.
    25. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    26. Alessandro Hinna & Fabio Monteduro, 2017. "Boards, governance and value creation in grant-giving foundations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 935-961, December.
    27. Bruno Cazenave & Jeremy Morales, 2021. "NGO responses to financial evaluation: auditability, purification and performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 731-756, February.
    28. Marc J. Epstein & Kristi Yuthas, 2010. "Mission impossible: diffusion and drift in the microfinance industry," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 201-221, October.
    29. Malika Igalla & Jurian Edelenbos & Ingmar van Meerkerk, 2020. "What explains the performance of community-based initiatives? Testing the impact of leadership, social capital, organizational capacity, and government support," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 602-632, April.
    30. Alexa Böckel & Jacob Hörisch & Isabell Tenner, 2021. "A systematic literature review of crowdfunding and sustainability: highlighting what really matters," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 433-453, April.
    31. Lurdes Barroso Simao & Luísa Cagica Carvalho & Maria José Madeira, 2021. "Intellectual structure of management innovation: bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 651-677, July.
    32. Per G. Svensson & Marion E. Hambrick, 2016. "“Pick and choose our battles” – Understanding organizational capacity in a sport for development and peace organization," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 120-132, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julian Andrés Diaz Tautiva & Felipe Ignacio Rifo Rivera & Sebastian Andrés Barros Celume & Sergio Andrés Rifo Rivera, 2024. "Mapping the research about organisations in the latin american context: a bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 121-169, February.
    2. Julián Andres Díaz Tautiva & Joana Huaman & Roberto D. Ponce Oliva, 2024. "Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021)," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 227-261, February.
    3. Oguzhan Ozturk, 2021. "Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: an overview," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 525-552, July.
    4. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    5. Jörn Block & Christian Fisch & Farooq Rehan, 2020. "Religion and entrepreneurship: a map of the field and a bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 591-627, November.
    6. Neelam Kaushal & Rahul Pratap Singh Kaurav & Brijesh Sivathanu & Neeraj Kaushik, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 455-493, June.
    7. Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli & Md. Aminul Islam & Mohd Faizal bin Yusof & Md. Sharif Hassan & Md. Arif Hassan, 2023. "Embracing Digital Transformation in Financial Services: From Past to Future," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    8. Wagner, Caroline S. & Roessner, J. David & Bobb, Kamau & Klein, Julie Thompson & Boyack, Kevin W. & Keyton, Joann & Rafols, Ismael & Börner, Katy, 2011. "Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 14-26.
    9. Saurav Chandra Talukder & Zoltán Lakner, 2023. "Exploring the Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship and Crowdfunding: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Hambrick, Marion E. & Svensson, Per G. & Kang, Seungmin, 2019. "Using social network analysis to investigate interorganizational relationships and capacity building within a sport for development coalition," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 708-723.
    11. Tejaswi Patil & Zillur Rahman, 2023. "A bibliometric analysis of scientific literature on guilt in marketing," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1385-1415, September.
    12. Jan Lampe & Priscilla Sarai Kraft & Andreas Bausch, 2020. "Mapping the Field of Research on Entrepreneurial Organizations (1937–2016): A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 784-816, July.
    13. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    14. Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay & Das, V. Mukunda & Sharma, Anuj, 2020. "Bibliometric overview of the Technological Forecasting and Social Change journal: Analysis from 1970 to 2018," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Oğuzhan Öztürk & Rıdvan Kocaman & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2024. "How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3333-3361, November.
    16. Millar, Patti & Doherty, Alison, 2016. "Capacity building in nonprofit sport organizations: Development of a process model," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 365-377.
    17. Francis Heylighen, 1999. "Collective Intelligence and its Implementation on the Web: Algorithms to Develop a Collective Mental Map," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 253-280, October.
    18. Schulenkorf, Nico, 2017. "Managing sport-for-development: Reflections and outlook," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 243-251.
    19. Cosa, Marcello & Urban, Boris, 2023. "A systematic review of performance measurement systems and their relevance to social enterprises," OSF Preprints 6ft2p, Center for Open Science.
    20. Cavicchi, Caterina & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2023. "Digital information systems in support of accountability: The case of a welfare provision non-governmental organisation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social performance; Resources; Capabilities; Nonprofit; Bibliometric analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:74:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s11301-022-00297-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.