IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v28y2022i4d10.1007_s10985-022-09563-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Screening for chronic diseases: optimizing lead time through balancing prescribed frequency and individual adherence

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Rice

    (University of Colorado)

  • Brent A. Johnson

    (University of Rochester)

  • Robert L. Strawderman

    (University of Rochester)

Abstract

Screening for chronic diseases, such as cancer, is an important public health priority, but traditionally only the frequency or rate of screening has received attention. In this work, we study the importance of adhering to recommended screening policies and develop new methodology to better optimize screening policies when adherence is imperfect. We consider a progressive disease model with four states (healthy, undetectable preclinical, detectable preclinical, clinical), and overlay this with a stochastic screening–behavior model using the theory of renewal processes that allows us to capture imperfect adherence to screening programs in a transparent way. We show that decreased adherence leads to reduced efficacy of screening programs, quantified here using elements of the lead time distribution (i.e., the time between screening diagnosis and when diagnosis would have occurred clinically in the absence of screening). Under the assumption of an inverse relationship between prescribed screening frequency and individual adherence, we show that the optimal screening frequency generally decreases with increasing levels of non-adherence. We apply this model to an example in breast cancer screening, demonstrating how accounting for imperfect adherence affects the recommended screening frequency.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Rice & Brent A. Johnson & Robert L. Strawderman, 2022. "Screening for chronic diseases: optimizing lead time through balancing prescribed frequency and individual adherence," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 605-636, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:28:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-022-09563-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-022-09563-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-022-09563-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-022-09563-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Smith, 1995. "Generalized Chebychev Inequalities: Theory and Applications in Decision Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 807-825, October.
    2. Dongfeng Wu & Gary L. Rosner & Lyle Broemeling, 2005. "MLE and Bayesian Inference of Age-Dependent Sensitivity and Transition Probability in Periodic Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1056-1063, December.
    3. Thomas L. Lincoln & George H. Weiss, 1964. "A Statistical Evaluation of Recurrent Medical Examinations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 187-205, April.
    4. Wu Dongfeng & Kafadar Karen & Rosner Gary L. & Broemeling Lyle D., 2012. "The Lead Time Distribution When Lifetime is Subject to Competing Risks in Cancer Screening," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Ruiguang Song & John M. Karon & Edward White & Gary Goldbaum, 2006. "Estimating the Distribution of a Renewal Process from Times at which Events from an Independent Process Are Detected," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 838-846, September.
    6. de Leeuw, Jan & Lange, Kenneth, 2009. "Sharp quadratic majorization in one dimension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 2471-2484, May.
    7. Giovanni Parmigiani & Steven Skates & Marvin Zelen, 2002. "Modeling and Optimization in Early Detection Programs with a Single Exam," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 30-36, March.
    8. Debasis Sengupta & Asok K. Nanda, 1999. "Log‐concave and concave distributions in reliability," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 419-433, June.
    9. Dongfeng Wu & Gary L. Rosner & Lyle D. Broemeling, 2007. "Bayesian Inference for the Lead Time in Periodic Cancer Screening," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 873-880, September.
    10. Lo, Andrew W., 1987. "Semi-parametric upper bounds for option prices and expected payoffs," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 373-387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuluaga, Luis F. & Peña, Javier & Du, Donglei, 2009. "Third-order extensions of Lo's semiparametric bound for European call options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 557-570, October.
    2. Derek Singh & Shuzhong Zhang, 2020. "Tight Bounds for a Class of Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Risk Measures," Papers 2010.05398, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    3. Villegas, Andrés M. & Medaglia, Andrés L. & Zuluaga, Luis F., 2012. "Computing bounds on the expected payoff of Alternative Risk Transfer products," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 271-281.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ioana Popescu, 2002. "On the Relation Between Option and Stock Prices: A Convex Optimization Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 358-374, April.
    5. J. A. Primbs, 2010. "SDP Relaxation of Arbitrage Pricing Bounds Based on Option Prices and Moments," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 137-155, January.
    6. Ioana Popescu, 2005. "A Semidefinite Programming Approach to Optimal-Moment Bounds for Convex Classes of Distributions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 632-657, August.
    7. Wu Dongfeng & Kafadar Karen & Rosner Gary L. & Broemeling Lyle D., 2012. "The Lead Time Distribution When Lifetime is Subject to Competing Risks in Cancer Screening," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    9. Laurent El Ghaoui & Maksim Oks & Francois Oustry, 2003. "Worst-Case Value-At-Risk and Robust Portfolio Optimization: A Conic Programming Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 543-556, August.
    10. Samuel Palmer, 2014. "Accelerating Implicit Finite Difference Schemes Using a Hardware Optimized Tridiagonal Solver for FPGAs," Papers 1402.5094, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2015.
    11. Javier Pena & Juan Vera & Luis Zuluaga, 2010. "Static-arbitrage lower bounds on the prices of basket options via linear programming," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(8), pages 819-827.
    12. Viet Anh Nguyen & Fan Zhang & Shanshan Wang & Jose Blanchet & Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2021. "Robustifying Conditional Portfolio Decisions via Optimal Transport," Papers 2103.16451, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    13. Nikolaus Schweizer & Nora Szech, 2018. "Optimal Revelation of Life-Changing Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5250-5262, November.
    14. Kenneth Lange & Hua Zhou, 2022. "A Legacy of EM Algorithms," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(S1), pages 52-66, December.
    15. Donald J. Brown & Rustam Ibragimov, 2005. "Sign Tests for Dependent Observations and Bounds for Path-Dependent Options," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1518, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    16. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    17. Om Prakash Yadav & Shashwati Ray, 2021. "A novel method of preprocessing and modeling ECG signals with Lagrange–Chebyshev interpolating polynomials," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(3), pages 377-390, June.
    18. Elliot Lee & Mariel Lavieri & Michael Volk & Yongcai Xu, 2015. "Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 363-375, September.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/30 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ayman Hijazy & András Zempléni, 2021. "Gamma Process-Based Models for Disease Progression," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 241-255, March.
    21. Roy H. Kwon & Jonathan Y. Li, 2016. "A stochastic semidefinite programming approach for bounds on option pricing under regime switching," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 41-75, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:28:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-022-09563-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.