IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v58y2002i1p30-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Optimization in Early Detection Programs with a Single Exam

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Parmigiani
  • Steven Skates
  • Marvin Zelen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Parmigiani & Steven Skates & Marvin Zelen, 2002. "Modeling and Optimization in Early Detection Programs with a Single Exam," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(1), pages 30-36, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:58:y:2002:i:1:p:30-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00030.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph S. Pliskin & Donald S. Shepard & Milton C. Weinstein, 1980. "Utility Functions for Life Years and Health Status," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 206-224, February.
    2. David M. Eddy, 1983. "A Mathematical Model for Timing Repeated Medical Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 3(1), pages 45-62, February.
    3. Thomas L. Lincoln & George H. Weiss, 1964. "A Statistical Evaluation of Recurrent Medical Examinations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 187-205, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John D. Rice & Brent A. Johnson & Robert L. Strawderman, 2022. "Screening for chronic diseases: optimizing lead time through balancing prescribed frequency and individual adherence," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 605-636, October.
    2. Fatih Safa Erenay & Oguzhan Alagoz & Adnan Said, 2014. "Optimizing Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Surveillance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 381-400, July.
    3. Elliot Lee & Mariel Lavieri & Michael Volk & Yongcai Xu, 2015. "Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 363-375, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bengt Liljas, 2011. "Welfare, QALYs, and costs – a comment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 68-72, January.
    2. Ryan Edwards, 2013. "The cost of uncertain life span," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 1485-1522, October.
    3. Lars Peter Østerdal, 2004. "Exponential Health Utility: A Characterization and Comments on a Paper by Happich and Mühlbacher," Discussion Papers 04-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    4. Helen Andersson & Mikael Svensson & Håkan Bergh, 2021. "The cost-effectiveness of a two-step blood pressure screening programme in a dental health-care setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Gordon Hazen, 2004. "Multiattribute Structure for QALYs," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(4), pages 205-216, December.
    6. Hansen, Kristian S. & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Østerdal, Lars P., 2023. "Productivity and quality-adjusted life years: QALYs, PALYs and beyond," Working Papers 11-2023, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    7. Mark J.C. Nuijten Md, Mba1 & Maiwenn Al Phd1, & Frans Rutten Phd1, 2006. "Inter-variable Uncertainty In Decision Analytic Modeling: The Concept Of Second-order Sensitivity/Incertidumbre Entre Variables En Modelos De Decisión Analítica: El Concepto De Sensibilidad De Segundo," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 24, pages 711-730, Diciembre.
    8. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2013. "A new axiomatic approach to the evaluation of population health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 515-523.
    9. Alan M. Garber & Charles E. Phelps, 1992. "Economic Foundations of Cost Effective Analysis," NBER Working Papers 4164, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Attema, Arthur E. & Brouwer, Werner B.F., 2012. "A test of independence of discounting from quality of life," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 22-34.
    11. Lancsar, Emily & Gu, Yuanyuan & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte & Butler, Jim & Ratcliffe, Julie & Bulfone, Liliana & Donaldson, Cam, 2020. "The relative value of different QALY types," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Amiram Gafni, 2006. "Economic Evaluation of Health-care Programmes: Is CEA Better than CBA?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(3), pages 407-418, July.
    13. Walton Sumner & Eric Ding & Irene D. Fischer & Michael D. Hagen, 2014. "Methods for Performing Survival Curve Quality-of-Life Assessments," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(6), pages 787-799, August.
    14. Anna Scherbina, 2021. "Assessing the Optimality of a COVID Lockdown in the United States," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 177-201, July.
    15. Gandjour, Afschin & Chernyak, Nadja, 2011. "A new prize system for drug innovation," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 170-177.
    16. Han Bleichrodt & John Miyamoto, 2003. "A Characterization of Quality-Adjusted Life-Years Under Cumulative Prospect Theory," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 181-193, February.
    17. Attema, Arthur E. & l’Haridon, Olivier & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2019. "Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 15-24.
    18. Attema, Arthur & Frasch, Jona & L'Haridon, Olivier, 2020. "Multivariate risk preferences in the QALY model," MPRA Paper 103339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Patrick Hofstetter & Jane C. Bare & James K. Hammitt & Patricia A. Murphy & Glenn E. Rice, 2002. "Tools for Comparative Analysis of Alternatives: Competing or Complementary Perspectives?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 833-851, October.
    20. Johannesson, Magnus, 1995. "Qalys: A comment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 327-328, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:58:y:2002:i:1:p:30-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.