IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v26y2020i4d10.1007_s10985-020-09494-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric regression and risk prediction with competing risks data under missing cause of failure

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgos Bakoyannis

    (Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine)

  • Ying Zhang

    (University of Nebraska Medical Center)

  • Constantin T. Yiannoutsos

    (Indiana University Fairbanks School of Public Health and School of Medicine)

Abstract

The cause of failure in cohort studies that involve competing risks is frequently incompletely observed. To address this, several methods have been proposed for the semiparametric proportional cause-specific hazards model under a missing at random assumption. However, these proposals provide inference for the regression coefficients only, and do not consider the infinite dimensional parameters, such as the covariate-specific cumulative incidence function. Nevertheless, the latter quantity is essential for risk prediction in modern medicine. In this paper we propose a unified framework for inference about both the regression coefficients of the proportional cause-specific hazards model and the covariate-specific cumulative incidence functions under missing at random cause of failure. Our approach is based on a novel computationally efficient maximum pseudo-partial-likelihood estimation method for the semiparametric proportional cause-specific hazards model. Using modern empirical process theory we derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators for the regression coefficients and the covariate-specific cumulative incidence functions, and provide methodology for constructing simultaneous confidence bands for the latter. Simulation studies show that our estimators perform well even in the presence of a large fraction of missing cause of failures, and that the regression coefficient estimator can be substantially more efficient compared to the previously proposed augmented inverse probability weighting estimator. The method is applied using data from an HIV cohort study and a bladder cancer clinical trial.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgos Bakoyannis & Ying Zhang & Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, 2020. "Semiparametric regression and risk prediction with competing risks data under missing cause of failure," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 659-684, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:26:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-020-09494-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-020-09494-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-020-09494-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-020-09494-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiying Pan & D. Y. Lin, 2005. "Goodness-of-Fit Methods for Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1000-1009, December.
    2. Kaifeng Lu & Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2001. "Multiple Imputation Methods for Estimating Regression Coefficients in the Competing Risks Model with Missing Cause of Failure," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 1191-1197, December.
    3. Radu V. Craiu, 2004. "Inference based on the EM algorithm for the competing risks model with masked causes of failure," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(3), pages 543-558, September.
    4. Daniel Nevo & Reiko Nishihara & Shuji Ogino & Molin Wang, 2018. "The competing risks Cox model with auxiliary case covariates under weaker missing-at-random cause of failure," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 425-442, July.
    5. Guosheng Yin & Jianwen Cai, 2004. "Additive hazards model with multivariate failure time data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 801-818, December.
    6. Guozhi Gao & Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2005. "Semiparametric estimators for the regression coefficients in the linear transformation competing risks model with missing cause of failure," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 875-891, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teng Fei & John Hanfelt & Limin Peng, 2023. "Evaluating the association between latent classes and competing risks outcomes with multiphenotype data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 488-501, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teng Fei & John Hanfelt & Limin Peng, 2023. "Evaluating the association between latent classes and competing risks outcomes with multiphenotype data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 488-501, March.
    2. Daniel Nevo & Reiko Nishihara & Shuji Ogino & Molin Wang, 2018. "The competing risks Cox model with auxiliary case covariates under weaker missing-at-random cause of failure," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 425-442, July.
    3. Fei Heng & Yanqing Sun & Seunggeun Hyun & Peter B. Gilbert, 2020. "Analysis of the time-varying Cox model for the cause-specific hazard functions with missing causes," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 731-760, October.
    4. Natalia A. Gouskova & Feng-Chang Lin & Jason P. Fine, 2017. "Nonparametric analysis of competing risks data with event category missing at random," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 104-113, March.
    5. Jie He & Hui Li & Shumei Zhang & Xiaogang Duan, 2019. "Additive hazards model with auxiliary subgroup survival information," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 128-149, January.
    6. Yanqing Sun & Li Qi & Fei Heng & Peter B. Gilbert, 2020. "A hybrid approach for the stratified mark‐specific proportional hazards model with missing covariates and missing marks, with application to vaccine efficacy trials," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 791-814, August.
    7. Yanqing Sun & Xiyuan Qian & Qiong Shou & Peter B. Gilbert, 2017. "Analysis of two-phase sampling data with semiparametric additive hazards models," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 377-399, July.
    8. Alejandra Tapia & Viviana Giampaoli & Víctor Leiva & Yuhlong Lio, 2020. "Data-Influence Analytics in Predictive Models Applied to Asthma Disease," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Hui Li & Xiaogang Duan & Guosheng Yin, 2016. "Generalized Method of Moments for Additive Hazards Model with Clustered Dental Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(4), pages 1124-1139, December.
    10. Tang, Min & Slud, Eric V. & Pfeiffer, Ruth M., 2014. "Goodness of fit tests for linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 176-193.
    11. Qiu, Zhiping & Chen, Xiaoping & Zhou, Yong, 2015. "A kernel-assisted imputation estimating method for the additive hazards model with missing censoring indicator," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 89-97.
    12. Xiaolin Chen & Jianwen Cai, 2018. "Reweighted estimators for additive hazard model with censoring indicators missing at random," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 224-249, April.
    13. Margarita Moreno-Betancur & Grégoire Rey & Aurélien Latouche, 2015. "Direct likelihood inference and sensitivity analysis for competing risks regression with missing causes of failure," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 498-507, June.
    14. Ling Lan & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Somnath Datta, 2017. "Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 31-57, January.
    15. Song, Weixing & Du, Juan, 2010. "Distribution-free lack-of-fit tests in balanced mixed models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(17-18), pages 1378-1387, September.
    16. Subramanian, Sundarraman & Bandyopadhyay, Dipankar, 2010. "Doubly robust semiparametric estimation for the missing censoring indicator model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(7-8), pages 621-630, April.
    17. Sanjib Basu & Ram C. Tiwari, 2010. "Breast cancer survival, competing risks and mixture cure model: a Bayesian analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 173(2), pages 307-329, April.
    18. Qiqing Yu & G. Wong & Hao Qin & Jiaping Wang, 2012. "Random partition masking model for censored and masked competing risks data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 64(1), pages 69-85, February.
    19. Wang, Qihua & Liu, Wei & Liu, Chunling, 2009. "Probability density estimation for survival data with censoring indicators missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(5), pages 835-850, May.
    20. Monsalve-Cobis, Abelardo & González-Manteiga, Wenceslao & Febrero-Bande, Manuel, 2011. "Goodness-of-fit test for interest rate models: An approach based on empirical processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3073-3092, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:26:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10985-020-09494-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.