IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v190y2021i2d10.1007_s10957-021-01891-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forward–Backward–Half Forward Dynamical Systems for Monotone Inclusion Problems with Application to v-GNE

Author

Listed:
  • Pankaj Gautam

    (Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University))

  • Daya Ram Sahu

    (Banaras Hindu University)

  • Avinash Dixit

    (Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University))

  • Tanmoy Som

    (Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University))

Abstract

In this paper, the first-order forward–backward–half forward dynamical systems associated with the inclusion problem consisting of three monotone operators are analyzed. The framework modifies the forward–backward–forward dynamical system by adding a cocoercive operator to the inclusion. The existence, uniqueness, and weak asymptotic convergence of the generated trajectories are discussed. A variable metric forward–backward–half forward dynamical system with the essence of non-self-adjoint linear operators is introduced. The proposed notion, in turn, extends the forward–backward–forward dynamical system and forward–backward dynamical system in the framework of variable metric by relaxing some conditions on the metrics. The distributed dynamical system is further explored to compute a generalized Nash equilibrium in a monotone game as an application. A numerical example is provided to illustrate the convergence of trajectories.

Suggested Citation

  • Pankaj Gautam & Daya Ram Sahu & Avinash Dixit & Tanmoy Som, 2021. "Forward–Backward–Half Forward Dynamical Systems for Monotone Inclusion Problems with Application to v-GNE," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 491-523, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:190:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01891-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-021-01891-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-021-01891-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-021-01891-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick L. Combettes & Jean-Christophe Pesquet, 2011. "Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Heinz H. Bauschke & Regina S. Burachik & Patrick L. Combettes & Veit Elser & D. Russell Luke & Henry (ed.), Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, chapter 0, pages 185-212, Springer.
    2. B. Abbas & H. Attouch & Benar F. Svaiter, 2014. "Newton-Like Dynamics and Forward-Backward Methods for Structured Monotone Inclusions in Hilbert Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 331-360, May.
    3. Francisco Facchinei & Christian Kanzow, 2010. "Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 177-211, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Stein & Nathan Sudermann-Merx, 2016. "The Cone Condition and Nonsmoothness in Linear Generalized Nash Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 687-709, August.
    2. Guillaume Sagnol & Edouard Pauwels, 2019. "An unexpected connection between Bayes A-optimal designs and the group lasso," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 565-584, April.
    3. Ernest K. Ryu & Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for pathological convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 747-778, December.
    4. Junhong Lin & Lorenzo Rosasco & Silvia Villa & Ding-Xuan Zhou, 2018. "Modified Fejér sequences and applications," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 95-113, September.
    5. Nadja Harms & Tim Hoheisel & Christian Kanzow, 2015. "On a Smooth Dual Gap Function for a Class of Player Convex Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 659-685, August.
    6. Weiyang Ding & Michael K. Ng & Wenxing Zhang, 2024. "A generalized alternating direction implicit method for consensus optimization: application to distributed sparse logistic regression," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 727-753, November.
    7. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2015. "It is a matter of hierarchy: a Nash equilibrium problem perspective on bilevel programming," DIAG Technical Reports 2015-07, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    8. Silvia Bonettini & Peter Ochs & Marco Prato & Simone Rebegoldi, 2023. "An abstract convergence framework with application to inertial inexact forward–backward methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 319-362, March.
    9. Puya Latafat & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2017. "Asymmetric forward–backward–adjoint splitting for solving monotone inclusions involving three operators," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 57-93, September.
    10. Sedi Bartz & Rubén Campoy & Hung M. Phan, 2022. "An Adaptive Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 1019-1055, December.
    11. Gui-Hua Lin & Zhen-Ping Yang & Hai-An Yin & Jin Zhang, 2023. "A dual-based stochastic inexact algorithm for a class of stochastic nonsmooth convex composite problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 669-710, November.
    12. Hedy Attouch & Alexandre Cabot & Zaki Chbani & Hassan Riahi, 2018. "Inertial Forward–Backward Algorithms with Perturbations: Application to Tikhonov Regularization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 1-36, October.
    13. Alexey Izmailov & Mikhail Solodov, 2014. "On error bounds and Newton-type methods for generalized Nash equilibrium problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 201-218, October.
    14. TAYLOR, Adrien B. & HENDRICKX, Julien M. & François GLINEUR, 2016. "Exact worst-case performance of first-order methods for composite convex optimization," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2016052, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    15. Suthep Suantai & Kunrada Kankam & Prasit Cholamjiak, 2020. "A Novel Forward-Backward Algorithm for Solving Convex Minimization Problem in Hilbert Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Wang, Yugang & Huang, Ting-Zhu & Zhao, Xi-Le & Deng, Liang-Jian & Ji, Teng-Yu, 2020. "A convex single image dehazing model via sparse dark channel prior," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    17. Leonardo Galli & Christian Kanzow & Marco Sciandrone, 2018. "A nonmonotone trust-region method for generalized Nash equilibrium and related problems with strong convergence properties," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 629-652, April.
    18. Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 880-891.
    19. Otgochuluu, Ch. & Altangerel, L. & Battur, G. & Khashchuluun, Ch. & Dorjsundui, G., 2021. "A game theory application in the copper market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Migot, Tangi & Cojocaru, Monica-G., 2020. "A parametrized variational inequality approach to track the solution set of a generalized nash equilibrium problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1136-1147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:190:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10957-021-01891-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.