IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v103y1999i2d10.1023_a1021796501467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Control of a Ship for Course Change and Sidestep Maneuvers

Author

Listed:
  • A. Miele

    (Rice University)

  • T. Wang

    (Rice University)

  • C. S. Chao

    (Rice University
    Chung Cheng Institute of Technology)

  • J. B. Dabney

    (Rice University)

Abstract

We consider a ship subject to kinematic, dynamic, and moment equations and steered via rudder under the assumptions that the rudder angle and rudder angle time rate are subject to upper and lower bounds. We formulate and solve four Mayer problems of optimal control, the optimization criterion being the minimum time. Problems P1 and P2 deal with course change maneuvers. In Problem P1, a ship initially in quasi-steady state must reach the final point with a given yaw angle and zero yaw angle time rate. Problem P2 differs from Problem P1 in that the additional requirement of quasi-steady state is imposed at the final point. Problems P3 and P4 deal with sidestep maneuvers. In Problem P3, a ship initially in quasi-steady state must reach the final point with a given lateral distance, zero yaw angle, and zero yaw angle time rate. Problem P4 differs from Problem P3 in that the additional requirement of quasi-steady state is imposed at the final point. The above Mayer problems are solved via the sequential gradient-restoration algorithm in conjunction with a new singularity avoiding transformation which accounts automatically for the bounds on rudder angle and rudder angle time rate. The optimal control histories involve multiple subarcs along which either the rudder angle is kept at one of the extreme positions or the rudder angle time rate is held at one of the extreme values. In problems where quasi-steady state is imposed at the final point, there is a higher number of subarcs than in problems where quasi-steady state is not imposed; the higher number of subarcs is due to the additional requirement that the lateral velocity and rudder angle vanish at the final point.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Miele & T. Wang & C. S. Chao & J. B. Dabney, 1999. "Optimal Control of a Ship for Course Change and Sidestep Maneuvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 259-282, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:103:y:1999:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1021796501467
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1021796501467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1021796501467
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1021796501467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Y. Tzeng, 1998. "Optimal Control of a Ship for a Course-Changing Maneuver," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(2), pages 281-297, May.
    2. Y. Yavin & C. Frangos & T. Miloh & G. Zilman, 1997. "Collision Avoidance by a Ship with a Moving Obstacle: Computation of Feasible Command Strategies," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 53-66, April.
    3. A. Miele & S. Mancuso, 1998. "Optimal Ascent Trajectories and Feasibility of Next-Generation Orbital Spacecraft," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 519-550, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2006. "Optimal Trajectories and Guidance Schemes for Ship Collision Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-21, April.
    2. T. Tarnopolskaya & N. Fulton & H. Maurer, 2012. "Synthesis of Optimal Bang–Bang Control for Cooperative Collision Avoidance for Aircraft (Ships) with Unequal Linear Speeds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 115-144, October.
    3. A. Miele & T. Wang & C. S. Chao & J. B. Dabney, 1999. "Optimal Control of a Ship for Collision Avoidance Maneuvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 495-519, December.
    4. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2005. "Maximin Approach to the Ship Collision Avoidance Problem via Multiple-Subarc Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 29-53, January.
    5. T. Tarnopolskaya & N. Fulton, 2010. "Synthesis of Optimal Control for Cooperative Collision Avoidance for Aircraft (Ships) with Unequal Turn Capabilities," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 367-390, February.
    6. T. Tarnopolskaya & N. Fulton, 2009. "Optimal Cooperative Collision Avoidance Strategy for Coplanar Encounter: Merz’s Solution Revisited," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 355-375, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Miele & T. Wang & C. S. Chao & J. B. Dabney, 1999. "Optimal Control of a Ship for Collision Avoidance Maneuvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 495-519, December.
    2. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2006. "Optimal Trajectories and Guidance Schemes for Ship Collision Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Alexei Kolokolov, 2011. "Futures hedging: Multivariate GARCH with dynamic conditional correlations (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 9, pages 61-75, July.
    4. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2005. "Maximin Approach to the Ship Collision Avoidance Problem via Multiple-Subarc Sequential Gradient-Restoration Algorithm," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 29-53, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:103:y:1999:i:2:d:10.1023_a:1021796501467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.