IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v97y1998i3d10.1023_a1022633924359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Ascent Trajectories and Feasibility of Next-Generation Orbital Spacecraft

Author

Listed:
  • A. Miele

    (Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University)

  • S. Mancuso

    (Aero-Astronautics Group, Rice University)

Abstract

This paper deals with the optimization of the ascent trajectories for single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) and two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) rocket-powered spacecraft. The maximum payload weight problem is studied for various combinations of initial thrust-to-weight ratio, engine specific impulse, and spacecraft structural factor. For TSTO rocket-powered spacecraft, two cases are studied: uniform structural factor and nonuniform structural factor between stages. The main conclusions are that: the design of SSTO configurations might be comfortably feasible, marginally feasible, or unfeasible, depending on the parameter values assumed; the design of TSTO configurations is not only feasible, but the payload appears to be considerably larger than that of SSTO configurations; for the case of a nonuniform structural factor, the most attactive TSTO design appears to be a first-stage structure made of only tanks and a second-stage structure made of engines, tanks, electronics, and so on. Improvements in engine specific impulse and spacecraft structural factor are desirable and crucial for SSTO feasibility; indeed, aerodynamic improvements do not yield significant improvements in payload weight. For SSTO configurations, the maximum payload weight behaves almost linearly with respect to the engine specific impulse and the spacecraft structural factor. The same property holds for TSTO configurations as long as the ratio of the structural factors of Stage 2 and Stage 1 is held constant. With reference to the specific impulse/structural factor domain, this property leads to the construction of a zero-payload line separating the feasibility region (positive payload) from the unfeasibility region (negative payload).

Suggested Citation

  • A. Miele & S. Mancuso, 1998. "Optimal Ascent Trajectories and Feasibility of Next-Generation Orbital Spacecraft," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 97(3), pages 519-550, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:97:y:1998:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022633924359
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1022633924359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1022633924359
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1022633924359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Miele & T. Wang & C. S. Chao & J. B. Dabney, 1999. "Optimal Control of a Ship for Collision Avoidance Maneuvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 495-519, December.
    2. A. Miele & T. Wang & C. S. Chao & J. B. Dabney, 1999. "Optimal Control of a Ship for Course Change and Sidestep Maneuvers," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 259-282, November.
    3. A. Miele & T. Wang, 2003. "Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:97:y:1998:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022633924359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.