IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v33y2022i3d10.1007_s10845-020-01673-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors for choosing production control systems in make-to-order shops: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando José Gómez Paredes

    (Federal University of São Carlos
    Universidad Centroamericana “José Simeón Cañas”)

  • Moacir Godinho Filho

    (Federal University of São Carlos)

  • Matthias Thürer

    (Jinan University (Zhuhai Campus))

  • Nuno O. Fernandes

    (Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco
    University of Minho)

  • Charbel José Chiappeta Jabbour

    (University of Lincoln
    Montpellier Business School (MBS))

Abstract

Production control systems (PCSs) control the flow of jobs in a production system. The selection of a suitable PCS in the context of make-to-order (MTO) is challenging, due to the characteristics of MTO businesses and the number of parameters or factors that comprise a PCS. The literature that compares PCSs in the MTO context reported contradictory results. In fact, there is a gap in the literature concerning which factors or parameters explain a PCS performance. This paper presents an analysis of comparative studies on PCS in the MTO context, using a systematic literature review, to reveal which control factors and manufacturing conditions influence a PCS performance. The analysis concentrates on studies that use simulation to assess the performance of PCSs. Our results indicate that the main difference in PCSs performance is the design of the control loops. Other important factors that must be considered in the choice of a PCS are the order release mechanism, the workload aggregation approach, and the workload estimation method used on control loops. A framework for choosing a suitable PCS for MTO companies is presented, considering these factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando José Gómez Paredes & Moacir Godinho Filho & Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Charbel José Chiappeta Jabbour, 2022. "Factors for choosing production control systems in make-to-order shops: a systematic literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 639-674, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01673-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01673-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01673-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01673-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yann Jaegler & Anicia Jaegler & Patrick Burlat & Samir Lamouri & Damien Trentesaux, 2018. "The ConWip production control system: a systematic review and classification," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5736-5757, September.
    2. Yacob Khojasteh & Ryo Sato, 2015. "Selection of a pull production control system in multi-stage production processes," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(14), pages 4363-4379, July.
    3. Christoph Karrer, 2012. "Engineering Production Control Strategies," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-24142-0, March.
    4. Land, Martin, 2006. "Parameters and sensitivity in workload control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 625-638, December.
    5. Canan Aglan & Mehmet Bulent Durmusoglu, 2015. "Lot-splitting approach of a hybrid manufacturing system under CONWIP production control: a mathematical model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(5), pages 1561-1583, March.
    6. Oladipupo Olaitan & Erlend Alfnes & Jørn Vatn & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2019. "CONWIP implementation in a system with cross-trained teams," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(20), pages 6473-6486, October.
    7. Peng Lin & Leidi Shen & Zhiheng Zhao & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Graduation manufacturing system: synchronization with IoT-enabled smart tickets," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2885-2900, December.
    8. Guodong Huang & Jie Chen & Xiuli Wang & Yiqun Shi & Houping Tian, 2017. "From loop structure to policy-making: a CONWIP design framework for hybrid flow shop control in one-of-a-kind production environment," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 3374-3391, June.
    9. Pedro L. Gonzalez-R & Marcos Calle & Jose L. Andrade-Pineda, 2018. "Job shop management of products under internal lifespan and external due date," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(16), pages 5457-5474, August.
    10. Land, Martin J., 2009. "Cobacabana (control of balance by card-based navigation): A card-based system for job shop control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 97-103, January.
    11. Marcello Braglia & Davide Castellano & Marco Frosolini, 2015. "A study on the importance of selection rules within unbalanced MTO POLCA-controlled production systems," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 457-468.
    12. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2018. "On the beat of the drum: improving the flow shop performance of the Drum–Buffer–Rope scheduling mechanism," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(9), pages 3294-3305, May.
    13. Betterton, Carl E. & Cox III, James F., 2009. "Espoused drum-buffer-rope flow control in serial lines: A comparative study of simulation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 66-79, January.
    14. Alper Türkyılmaz & Özlem Şenvar & İrem Ünal & Serol Bulkan, 2020. "A research survey: heuristic approaches for solving multi objective flexible job shop problems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1949-1983, December.
    15. Lage Junior, Muris & Godinho Filho, Moacir, 2010. "Variations of the kanban system: Literature review and classification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 13-21, May.
    16. Maico Roris Severino & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2019. "POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    17. Fernandes, Nuno O. & Thürer, Matthias & Silva, Cristóvão & Carmo-Silva, Sílvio, 2017. "Improving workload control order release: Incorporating a starvation avoidance trigger into continuous release," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 181-189.
    18. Fernandes, Nuno Octavio & do Carmo-Silva, Silvio, 2006. "Generic POLCA--A production and materials flow control mechanism for quick response manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 74-84, November.
    19. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson, 2020. "Material Flow Control in High‐Variety Make‐to‐Order Shops: Combining COBACABANA and POLCA," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(9), pages 2138-2152, September.
    20. Thürer, Matthias & Land, Martin J. & Stevenson, Mark, 2014. "Card-based workload control for job shops: Improving COBACABANA," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 180-188.
    21. Henrich, Peter & Land, Martin & Gaalman, Gerard, 2004. "Exploring applicability of the workload control concept," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 187-198, July.
    22. Michael Masin & Vittal Prabhu, 2009. "AWIP: A simulation-based feedback control algorithm for scalable design of self-regulating production control systems," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 120-133.
    23. Huang, Min & Wang, Dingwei & Ip, W. H., 1998. "Simulation study of CONWIP for a cold rolling plant," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 257-266, May.
    24. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2017. "On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4695-4711, August.
    25. Jos A. C. Bokhorst & Jannes Slomp, 2010. "Lean Production Control at a High-Variety, Low-Volume Parts Manufacturer," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 303-312, August.
    26. Guodong Huang & Jie Chen & Xiuli Wang & Yiqun Shi, 2015. "A simulation study of CONWIP assembly with multi-loop in mass production, multi-products and low volume and OKP environments," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(14), pages 4160-4175, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gosavi, Abhijit & Gosavi, Aparna A., 2024. "CONWIP control in the digitized world: The case of the cyber-physical jobshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark, 2021. "Improving superfluous load avoidance release (SLAR): A new load-based SLAR mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Peng Lin & Leidi Shen & Zhiheng Zhao & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Graduation manufacturing system: synchronization with IoT-enabled smart tickets," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(8), pages 2885-2900, December.
    3. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson, 2020. "Material Flow Control in High‐Variety Make‐to‐Order Shops: Combining COBACABANA and POLCA," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(9), pages 2138-2152, September.
    4. Maico Roris Severino & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2019. "POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    5. Davide Mezzogori & Giovanni Romagnoli & Francesco Zammori, 2021. "Defining accurate delivery dates in make to order job-shops managed by workload control," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 956-991, December.
    6. Land, Martin J., 2009. "Cobacabana (control of balance by card-based navigation): A card-based system for job shop control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 97-103, January.
    7. Guodong Huang & Jie Chen & Yacob Khojasteh, 2021. "A cyber-physical system deployment based on pull strategies for one-of-a-kind production with limited resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 579-596, February.
    8. Stefan Haeussler & Philipp Neuner & Matthias Thürer, 2023. "Balancing earliness and tardiness within workload control order release: an assessment by simulation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 487-508, June.
    9. Kasper, T.A. Arno & Land, Martin J. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2023. "Towards System State Dispatching in High‐Variety Manufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Pergher, Isaac & Frej, Eduarda Asfora & Roselli, Lucia Reis Peixoto & de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira, 2020. "Integrating simulation and FITradeoff method for scheduling rules selection in job-shop production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark & Protzman, Charles W., 2015. "COBACABANA (Control of Balance by Card Based Navigation): An alternative to kanban in the pure flow shop?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 143-151.
    12. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2017. "On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4695-4711, August.
    13. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2016. "Card-based delivery date promising in pure flow shops with order release control," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(22), pages 6798-6811, November.
    14. Fernandes, Nuno O. & Carmo-Silva, S., 2011. "Workload control under continuous order release," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 257-262, May.
    15. Gosavi, Abhijit & Gosavi, Aparna A., 2024. "CONWIP control in the digitized world: The case of the cyber-physical jobshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    16. Wolfgang Seiringer & Balwin Bokor & Klaus Altendorfer, 2024. "Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study," Papers 2405.02015, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    17. Jianjun Liu & Martin J. Land & Jos A. C. Bokhorst & Qingxin Chen, 2023. "Improving coordination in assembly job shops: redesigning order release and dispatching," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 669-697, September.
    18. Kaustav Kundu & Martin J. Land & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher & Jos A. C. Bokhorst, 2021. "Order review and release in make-to-order flow shops: analysis and design of new methods," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 750-782, September.
    19. Latifa Benhamou & Samir Lamouri & Patrick Burlat & Vincent Giard, 2023. "Digital Twin: An Added Value for Digital CONWIP in the Context of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Yarong Chen & Hongming Zhou & Peiyu Huang & FuhDer Chou & Shenquan Huang, 2022. "A refined order release method for achieving robustness of non-repetitive dynamic manufacturing system performance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 65-79, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01673-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.