IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2405.02015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Seiringer
  • Balwin Bokor
  • Klaus Altendorfer

Abstract

Selecting the appropriate production planning and control systems (PPCS) presents a significant challenge for many companies, as their performance, i.e., overall costs, depends on the production system environment. Key environmental characteristics include the system's structure, i.e., flow shop, hybrid shop, or job shop, and the planned shop load. Besides selecting a suitable PPCS, its parameterization significantly influences the performance. This publication investigates the performance and the optimal parametrization of Material Requirement Planning (MRP), Reorder Point System (RPS), and Constant Work In Progress (ConWIP) at different stochastic multi-item multi-stage production system environments by conducting a comprehensive full factorial simulation study. The results indicate that MRP and ConWIP generally outperform RPS in all observed environments. Moreover, when comparing MRP with ConWIP, the performance clearly varies depending on the specific production system environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Seiringer & Balwin Bokor & Klaus Altendorfer, 2024. "Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study," Papers 2405.02015, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.02015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.02015
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yann Jaegler & Anicia Jaegler & Patrick Burlat & Samir Lamouri & Damien Trentesaux, 2018. "The ConWip production control system: a systematic review and classification," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(17), pages 5736-5757, September.
    2. Richard J. Schonberger & Marc J. Schniederjans, 1984. "Reinventing Inventory Control," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 76-83, June.
    3. Klaus Altendorfer, 2019. "Effect of limited capacity on optimal planning parameters for a multi-item production system with setup times and advance demand information," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 1892-1913, March.
    4. Manuel Woschank & Patrick Dallasega & Johannes A. Kapeller, 2021. "Investigation of the Potential to Use Real-Time Data in Production Planning and Control of Make to Order (MTO) Manufacturing Companies," Springer Books, in: Dominik T. Matt & Vladimír Modrák & Helmut Zsifkovits (ed.), Implementing Industry 4.0 in SMEs, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 165-185, Springer.
    5. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    6. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson, 2022. "Production planning and control in multi-stage assembly systems: an assessment of Kanban, MRP, OPT (DBR) and DDMRP by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 1036-1050, February.
    7. Romain Miclo & Matthieu Lauras & Franck Fontanili & Jacques Lamothe & Steven A. Melnyk, 2019. "Demand Driven MRP: assessment of a new approach to materials management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 166-181, January.
    8. Guodong Huang & Jie Chen & Xiuli Wang & Yiqun Shi, 2015. "A simulation study of CONWIP assembly with multi-loop in mass production, multi-products and low volume and OKP environments," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(14), pages 4160-4175, July.
    9. Mark L. Spearman & David L. Woodruff & Wallace J. Hopp, 2022. "CONWIP Redux: reflections on 30 years of development and implementation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 381-387, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando José Gómez Paredes & Moacir Godinho Filho & Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Charbel José Chiappeta Jabbour, 2022. "Factors for choosing production control systems in make-to-order shops: a systematic literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 639-674, March.
    2. Thürer, Matthias & Stevenson, Mark, 2021. "Improving superfluous load avoidance release (SLAR): A new load-based SLAR mechanism," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Scherrer-Rathje, Maike & Boyle, Todd A. & Deflorin, Patricia, 2009. "Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 79-88.
    4. Miriam Pekarcikova & Peter Trebuna & Marek Kliment & Michal Dic, 2021. "Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Unai Apaolaza & Aitor Orue & Aitor Lizarralde & Aitor Oyarbide-Zubillaga, 2022. "Competitive Improvement through Integrated Management of Sales and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    7. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Maico Roris Severino & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2019. "POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    9. Durdu Hakan Utku, 2023. "The Evaluation and Improvement of the Production Processes of an Automotive Industry Company via Simulation and Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    11. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Munyaradzi Bvuchete & Sara Saartjie Grobbelaar & Joubert van Eeden, 2021. "A Network Maturity Mapping Tool for Demand-Driven Supply Chain Management: A Case for the Public Healthcare Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    13. Daniela Favaretto & Alessandro Marin & Marco Tolotti, 2023. "A theoretical validation of the DDMRP reorder policy," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Michael Freeman & Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2021. "Economies of Scale and Scope in Hospitals: An Empirical Study of Volume Spillovers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 673-697, February.
    15. Michal Medonos & Marie Jurová, 2016. "Implementing Lean Production - Application of Little's Law," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 1013-1019.
    16. Carlos Cuartas & Jose Aguilar, 2023. "Hybrid algorithm based on reinforcement learning for smart inventory management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 123-149, January.
    17. Peter M. Bernegger & Scott Webster, 2014. "Fixed-Cycle Smoothed Production Improves Lean Performance for Make-to-Stock Manufacturing," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 411-427, August.
    18. Michael F. Gorman & Jayden Hoff & Robert Kinion, 2009. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Tales from the Front: Case Studies Indicate the Potential Pitfalls of Misapplication of Lean Improvement Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 540-548, December.
    19. Askin, Ronald G. & Krishnan, Shravan, 2009. "Defining inventory control points in multiproduct stochastic pull systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 418-429, August.
    20. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2017. "On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4695-4711, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.02015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.