IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i4d10.1007_s10845-017-1338-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated framework for optimizing sculptured surface CNC tool paths based on direct software object evaluation and viral intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • N. A. Fountas

    (School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE)
    Kingston University)

  • R. Benhadj-Djilali

    (Kingston University)

  • C. I. Stergiou

    (Piraeus University of Applied Sciences (PUAS))

  • N. M. Vaxevanidis

    (School of Pedagogical and Technological Education (ASPETE))

Abstract

Two critical objectives in sculptured surface tool path optimization are machining accuracy and process efficiency. The former objective is characterized as the combined effect of chord error and scallop height, known as surface machining error, whilst the latter may be reflected by the number of cutting tool locations constituting the tool path. These objectives are entirely depended on the values to be selected for computing tool paths under a given cutting strategy and preset tolerance. In order to determine optimal tool path parameters that will simultaneously satisfy the trade-off incurred between these objectives, a novel; generic and unbiased environment integrated with a virus-evolutionary heuristic for intelligent tool path optimization is presented. The proposed environment has been developed using the open architecture of a cutting edge CAM system whilst it deploys a set of interactive functions to straightforwardly assess criteria without the formal knowledge of any objective function; but directly from computer-aided manufacturing attributes; fully responsible to formulate efficient tool paths. A utility based on weighted summation for multi-objective optimization has been introduced to capture the direct output of globally optimized tool paths avoiding this way problem oversimplification and statistical errors that mathematical relations involve. Results have been rigorously validated both computationally and experimentally with the aid of a benchmark sculptured part that has been previously tested by several noticeable research contributions. Based on the quality of research outputs it is shown that the proposed framework for optimizing sculptured surface CNC tool paths may gain a prominent role for further extending the capabilities of current industrial strategies and be the flagship of allied; not-yet industrially interfaced approaches for deploying similar software integration tools to transfer significant results to production.

Suggested Citation

  • N. A. Fountas & R. Benhadj-Djilali & C. I. Stergiou & N. M. Vaxevanidis, 2019. "An integrated framework for optimizing sculptured surface CNC tool paths based on direct software object evaluation and viral intelligence," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1581-1599, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1338-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1338-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-017-1338-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-017-1338-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nurezayana Zainal & Azlan Mohd Zain & Nor Haizan Mohamed Radzi & Muhamad Razib Othman, 2016. "Glowworm swarm optimization (GSO) for optimization of machining parameters," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 797-804, August.
    2. Mohamed Arezki Mellal & Edward J. Williams, 2016. "Parameter optimization of advanced machining processes using cuckoo optimization algorithm and hoopoe heuristic," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 927-942, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiao Qu & Yantao Shi & Jiongjiong Cai, 2022. "Target Force Curve Searching Method for Axial Electromagnetic Dynamic Balance of Scroll Compressor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Xiaoqian Zhang & Hanshan Li, 2022. "A Target Damage Assessment Mathematical Model and Calculation Method Based on the Intersection of Warhead Fragment and Target Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neeraj Kumar Bhoi & Harpreet Singh & Saurabh Pratap & Pramod K. Jain, 2022. "Chemical reaction optimization algorithm for machining parameter of abrasive water jet cutting," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 350-363, March.
    2. Mellal, Mohamed Arezki & Zio, Enrico, 2020. "System reliability-redundancy optimization with cold-standby strategy by an enhanced nest cuckoo optimization algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    3. Pauline Ong & Chon Haow Chong & Mohammad Zulafif Rahim & Woon Kiow Lee & Chee Kiong Sia & Muhammad Ariff Haikal Ahmad, 2020. "Intelligent approach for process modelling and optimization on electrical discharge machining of polycrystalline diamond," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 227-247, January.
    4. Maciej Grzenda & Andres Bustillo, 2019. "Semi-supervised roughness prediction with partly unlabeled vibration data streams," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 933-945, February.
    5. Antonio Del Prete & Rodolfo Franchi & Stefania Cacace & Quirico Semeraro, 2020. "Optimization of cutting conditions using an evolutive online procedure," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 481-499, February.
    6. Raghav Prasad Parouha & Pooja Verma, 2022. "An innovative hybrid algorithm for bound-unconstrained optimization problems and applications," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1273-1336, June.
    7. Yongmao Xiao & Wei Yan & Ruping Wang & Zhigang Jiang & Ying Liu, 2021. "Research on Blank Optimization Design Based on Low-Carbon and Low-Cost Blank Process Route Optimization Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Mohamed Arezki Mellal & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An adaptive cuckoo optimization algorithm for system design optimization under failure dependencies," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1099-1105, December.
    9. Elango Natarajan & Varadaraju Kaviarasan & Wei Hong Lim & Sew Sun Tiang & S. Parasuraman & Sangeetha Elango, 2020. "Non-dominated sorting modified teaching–learning-based optimization for multi-objective machining of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 911-935, April.
    10. Byeongwoo Jeon & Joo-Sung Yoon & Jumyung Um & Suk-Hwan Suh, 2020. "The architecture development of Industry 4.0 compliant smart machine tool system (SMTS)," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1837-1859, December.
    11. Daniele Marini & Jonathan R. Corney, 2021. "Concurrent optimization of process parameters and product design variables for near net shape manufacturing processes," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 611-631, February.
    12. R. Venkata Rao & Dhiraj P. Rai & J. Balic, 2019. "Multi-objective optimization of abrasive waterjet machining process using Jaya algorithm and PROMETHEE Method," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 2101-2127, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1338-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.