IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i2d10.1007_s13132-023-01433-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Parycek

    (University for Continuing Education Krems)

  • Verena Schmid

    (University for Continuing Education Krems)

  • Anna-Sophie Novak

    (University for Continuing Education Krems)

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) systems into administrative procedures can revolutionize the way processes are conducted and fundamentally change established forms of action and organization in administrative law. However, implementing AI in administrative procedures requires a comprehensive evaluation of the capabilities and limitations of different systems, including considerations of transparency and data availability. Data are a crucial factor in the operation of AI systems and the validity of their predictions. It is essential to ensure that the data used to train AI algorithms are extensive, representative, and free of bias. Transparency is also an important aspect establishing trust and reliability in AI systems, particularly regarding the potential for transparent representation in rule-based and machine-learning AI systems. This paper examines the potential and challenges that arise from integrating AI into administrative procedures. In addition, the paper offers a nuanced perspective on current developments in artificial intelligence and provides a conceptual framework for its potential applications in administrative procedures. Beyond this, the paper highlights essential framework conditions that require continuous monitoring to ensure optimal results in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Parycek & Verena Schmid & Anna-Sophie Novak, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Automation in Administrative Procedures: Potentials, Limitations, and Framework Conditions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8390-8415, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01433-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01433-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fon, Vincy & Parisi, Francesco, 2006. "Judicial precedents in civil law systems: A dynamic analysis," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 519-535, December.
    2. Umbach, Gaby & Tkalec, Igor, 2022. "Evaluating e-governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S. & Chenok, Daniel, 2020. "Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 205-213.
    4. James Mohun & Alex Roberts, 2020. "Cracking the code: Rulemaking for humans and machines," OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 42, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robertson, Jeandri & Ferreira, Caitlin & Botha, Elsamari & Oosthuizen, Kim, 2024. "Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 499-510.
    2. Gianluca MISURACA & Colin van Noordt, 2020. "AI Watch - Artificial Intelligence in public services: Overview of the use and impact of AI in public services in the EU," JRC Research Reports JRC120399, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Zhang, Weidong & Zuo, Na & He, Wu & Li, Songtao & Yu, Lu, 2021. "Factors influencing the use of artificial intelligence in government: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Berlemann, Michael & Christmann, Robin, 2017. "The Role of Precedents on Court Delay - Evidence from a civil law country," MPRA Paper 80057, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tan Yigitcanlar & Rashid Mehmood & Juan M. Corchado, 2021. "Green Artificial Intelligence: Towards an Efficient, Sustainable and Equitable Technology for Smart Cities and Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2014. "Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 183-219, June.
    7. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Alessandro Melcarne, 2017. "Careerism and judicial behavior," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 241-264, October.
    9. Roberts, Deborah L. & Candi, Marina, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and innovation management: Charting the evolving landscape," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Lucian Cernat, 2021. "Trade policy 2.0 and algorithms: towards the "easification" of FTA implementation," CIRANO Papers 2021pe-05, CIRANO.
    11. Henry A. Thompson, 2024. "AI and the law," Papers 2412.05090, arXiv.org.
    12. Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2009. "Upstream Innovation Protection: Common Law Evolution and the Dynamics of Wage Inequality," Working Papers 2009_20, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    13. Maria Antonelli & Veronica Grembi, 2013. "A microeconomic model of the demand of civil justice: is one institutional context better than another?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 295-318, October.
    14. Thomas Cantens, 2023. "How will the State think with the assistance of ChatGPT? The case of customs as an example of generative artificial intelligence in public administrations," CERDI Working papers hal-04233370, HAL.
    15. Thomas J. Miceli, 2009. "Legal Change: Selective Litigation, Judicial Bias, and Precedent," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(1), pages 157-168, January.
    16. Schaefer Hans-Bernd, 2020. "Laudatio: Francesco Parisi," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, March.
    17. Melcarne Alessandro & Ramello Giovanni B., 2015. "Judicial Independence, Judges’ Incentives and Efficiency," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 149-169, July.
    18. Makarius, Erin E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Fox, Joseph D. & Fox, Alexa K., 2020. "Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 262-273.
    19. Li, Jun & He, Wei & Li, Guilong, 2024. "Natural resources, economic complexity and growth nexus: Role of digital governance in addressing the resource curse," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Hülter, Svenja M. & Ertel, Christian & Heidemann, Ansgar, 2024. "Exploring the individual adoption of human resource analytics: Behavioural beliefs and the role of machine learning characteristics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01433-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.