IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v86y2023i2d10.1007_s10898-023-01275-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel graph-theoretical clustering approach to find a reduced set with extreme solutions of Pareto optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Sanath Kahagalage

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Hasan Hüseyin Turan

    (University of New South Wales)

  • Fatemeh Jalalvand

    (CSIRO’s Data 61)

  • Sondoss El Sawah

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization problems and their solution algorithms are of great importance as single-objective optimization problems are not usually a true representation of many real-world problems. In general, multi-objective optimization problems result in a large set of Pareto optimal solutions. Each solution in this set is optimal with some trade-offs. Therefore, it is difficult for the decision-maker to select a solution, especially in the absence of subjective or judgmental information. Moreover, an analysis of all the solutions is computationally expensive and, hence, not practical. Thus, researchers have proposed several techniques such as clustering and ranking of Pareto optimal solutions to reduce the number of solutions. The ranking methods are often used to obtain a single solution, which is not a good representation of the entire Pareto set. This paper deviates from the common approach and proposes a novel graph-theoretical clustering method. The quality of the clustering based on the Silhouette score is used to determine the number of clusters. The connectivity in the objective space is used to find representative solutions for clusters. One step forward, we identify ‘extreme solutions’. Hence, the reduced set contains both extreme solutions and representative solutions. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed method by using different 3D and 8D benchmark Pareto fronts as well as Pareto fronts from a case study in Royal Australian Navy. Results revealed that the reduced set obtained from the proposed method outperforms that from the K-means clustering, which is the most popular traditional clustering approach in Pareto pruning.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanath Kahagalage & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Fatemeh Jalalvand & Sondoss El Sawah, 2023. "A novel graph-theoretical clustering approach to find a reduced set with extreme solutions of Pareto optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 467-494, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:86:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-023-01275-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-023-01275-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-023-01275-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-023-01275-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Hartikainen & Kaisa Miettinen & Margaret Wiecek, 2012. "PAINT: Pareto front interpolation for nonlinear multiobjective optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 845-867, July.
    2. Beume, Nicola & Naujoks, Boris & Emmerich, Michael, 2007. "SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1653-1669, September.
    3. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Wannakrairot, Anupong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2022. "Pruning Pareto optimal solutions for multi-objective portfolio asset management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 203-220.
    4. Taboada, Heidi A. & Baheranwala, Fatema & Coit, David W. & Wattanapongsakorn, Naruemon, 2007. "Practical solutions for multi-objective optimization: An application to system reliability design problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 314-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliver Cuate & Oliver Schütze, 2020. "Pareto Explorer for Finding the Knee for Many Objective Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-24, September.
    2. El Mehdi, Er Raqabi & Ilyas, Himmich & Nizar, El Hachemi & Issmaïl, El Hallaoui & François, Soumis, 2023. "Incremental LNS framework for integrated production, inventory, and vessel scheduling: Application to a global supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Saeed Vasebi & Yeganeh M. Hayeri, 2021. "Collective Driving to Mitigate Climate Change: Collective-Adaptive Cruise Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Malavasi, Matteo & Ortobelli Lozza, Sergio & Trück, Stefan, 2021. "Second order of stochastic dominance efficiency vs mean variance efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1192-1206.
    5. Oliver Stein & Maximilian Volk, 2023. "Generalized Polarity and Weakest Constraint Qualifications in Multiobjective Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 1156-1190, September.
    6. Liagkouras, Konstantinos & Metaxiotis, Konstantinos, 2021. "Improving multi-objective algorithms performance by emulating behaviors from the human social analogue in candidate solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1019-1036.
    7. Alberto Pajares & Xavier Blasco & Juan Manuel Herrero & Miguel A. Martínez, 2021. "A Comparison of Archiving Strategies for Characterization of Nearly Optimal Solutions under Multi-Objective Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Gabriele Eichfelder & Corinna Krüger & Anita Schöbel, 2017. "Decision uncertainty in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 485-510, October.
    9. Morovati, Vahid & Pourkarimi, Latif, 2019. "Extension of Zoutendijk method for solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(1), pages 44-57.
    10. Gong, Wenyin & Cai, Zhihua, 2009. "An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive [epsilon]-dominance and orthogonal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 576-601, October.
    11. Andrea Ponti & Antonio Candelieri & Ilaria Giordani & Francesco Archetti, 2023. "Intrusion Detection in Networks by Wasserstein Enabled Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Cao, Dingzhou & Murat, Alper & Chinnam, Ratna Babu, 2013. "Efficient exact optimization of multi-objective redundancy allocation problems in series-parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 154-163.
    13. David Quintana & Roman Denysiuk & Sandra García-Rodríguez & Antonio Gaspar-Cunha, 2017. "Portfolio implementation risk management using evolutionary multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01881379, HAL.
    14. Yunsong Han & Hong Yu & Cheng Sun, 2017. "Simulation-Based Multiobjective Optimization of Timber-Glass Residential Buildings in Severe Cold Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Yeudiel Lara Moreno & Carlos Ignacio Hernández Castellanos, 2024. "A Hierarchical Approach to a Tri-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem Considering an ESG Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Laumanns, Marco & Zenklusen, Rico, 2011. "Stochastic convergence of random search methods to fixed size Pareto front approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 414-421, September.
    17. Ivo Couckuyt & Dirk Deschrijver & Tom Dhaene, 2014. "Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 575-594, November.
    18. Francisco Salas-Molina & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar & Pablo Díaz-García, 2018. "Selecting cash management models from a multiobjective perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 275-288, February.
    19. Cui, Yunfei & Geng, Zhiqiang & Zhu, Qunxiong & Han, Yongming, 2017. "Review: Multi-objective optimization methods and application in energy saving," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 681-704.
    20. Li, Zhaojun & Liao, Haitao & Coit, David W., 2009. "A two-stage approach for multi-objective decision making with applications to system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1585-1592.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:86:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-023-01275-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.