IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v86y2023i1d10.1007_s10898-022-01245-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TREGO: a trust-region framework for efficient global optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Youssef Diouane

    (Polytechnique Montréal)

  • Victor Picheny

    (Secondmind)

  • Rodolophe Le Riche

    (CNRS LIMOS, Mines St-Etienne and UCA)

  • Alexandre Scotto Di Perrotolo

    (Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

Efficient global optimization (EGO) is the canonical form of Bayesian optimization that has been successfully applied to solve global optimization of expensive-to-evaluate black-box problems. However, EGO struggles to scale with dimension, and offers limited theoretical guarantees. In this work, a trust-region framework for EGO (TREGO) is proposed and analyzed. TREGO alternates between regular EGO steps and local steps within a trust region. By following a classical scheme for the trust region (based on a sufficient decrease condition), the proposed algorithm enjoys global convergence properties, while departing from EGO only for a subset of optimization steps. Using extensive numerical experiments based on the well-known COCO bound constrained problems, we first analyze the sensitivity of TREGO to its own parameters, then show that the resulting algorithm is consistently outperforming EGO and getting competitive with other state-of-the-art black-box optimization methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Youssef Diouane & Victor Picheny & Rodolophe Le Riche & Alexandre Scotto Di Perrotolo, 2023. "TREGO: a trust-region framework for efficient global optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:86:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-022-01245-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-022-01245-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-022-01245-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-022-01245-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Picheny, Victor & Ginsbourger, David, 2014. "Noisy kriging-based optimization methods: A unified implementation within the DiceOptim package," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1035-1053.
    2. Y. Diouane & S. Gratton & L. Vicente, 2015. "Globally convergent evolution strategies for constrained optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 323-346, November.
    3. Roustant, Olivier & Ginsbourger, David & Deville, Yves, 2012. "DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-Based Metamodeling and Optimization," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i01).
    4. Luis Rios & Nikolaos Sahinidis, 2013. "Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1247-1293, July.
    5. Charles Audet & Kwassi Joseph Dzahini & Michael Kokkolaras & Sébastien Le Digabel, 2021. "Stochastic mesh adaptive direct search for blackbox optimization using probabilistic estimates," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 1-34, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diariétou Sambakhé & Lauriane Rouan & Jean-Noël Bacro & Eric Gozé, 2019. "Conditional optimization of a noisy function using a kriging metamodel," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 615-636, March.
    2. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    3. Jonas Bjerg Thomsen & Francesco Ferri & Jens Peter Kofoed & Kevin Black, 2018. "Cost Optimization of Mooring Solutions for Large Floating Wave Energy Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Ehsan Mehdad & Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2018. "Efficient global optimisation for black-box simulation via sequential intrinsic Kriging," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(11), pages 1725-1737, November.
    5. Gabriela Simonet & Julie Subervie & Driss Ezzine-De-Blas & Marina Cromberg & Amy Duchelle, 2015. "Paying smallholders not to cut down the amazon forest: impact evaluation of a REDD+ pilot project," Working Papers 1514, Chaire Economie du climat.
    6. Somayeh Moazeni & Warren B. Powell & Boris Defourny & Belgacem Bouzaiene-Ayari, 2017. "Parallel Nonstationary Direct Policy Search for Risk-Averse Stochastic Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 332-349, May.
    7. Biewen, Martin & Kugler, Philipp, 2021. "Two-stage least squares random forests with an application to Angrist and Evans (1998)," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    8. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    9. Olgun Aydin & Bartłomiej Igliński & Krzysztof Krukowski & Marek Siemiński, 2022. "Analyzing Wind Energy Potential Using Efficient Global Optimization: A Case Study for the City Gdańsk in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Jakubik, Johannes & Binding, Adrian & Feuerriegel, Stefan, 2021. "Directed particle swarm optimization with Gaussian-process-based function forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 157-169.
    11. Christophe Gouel & Nicolas Legrand, 2017. "Estimating the Competitive Storage Model with Trending Commodity Prices," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 744-763, June.
    12. Zhao, Jake, 2020. "Accounting for the corporate cash increase," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Hannes Schwarz & Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2018. "Two-stage stochastic, large-scale optimization of a decentralized energy system: a case study focusing on solar PV, heat pumps and storage in a residential quarter," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(1), pages 265-310, January.
    14. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Mehdad, Ehsan, 2014. "Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 573-582.
    15. Erickson, Collin B. & Ankenman, Bruce E. & Sanchez, Susan M., 2018. "Comparison of Gaussian process modeling software," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 179-192.
    16. Breitmoser, Yves & Valasek, Justin, 2017. "A rationale for unanimity in committees," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2017-308, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    17. Mehdad, E. & Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2014. "Global Optimization for Black-box Simulation via Sequential Intrinsic Kriging," Other publications TiSEM 8fa8d96f-a086-4c4b-88ab-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Krese, Gorazd & Lampret, Žiga & Butala, Vincenc & Prek, Matjaž, 2018. "Determination of a Building's balance point temperature as an energy characteristic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1034-1049.
    19. Tavakol Aghaei, Vahid & Ağababaoğlu, Arda & Bawo, Biram & Naseradinmousavi, Peiman & Yıldırım, Sinan & Yeşilyurt, Serhat & Onat, Ahmet, 2023. "Energy optimization of wind turbines via a neural control policy based on reinforcement learning Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    20. Leonardo Bargigli & Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2020. "Network calibration and metamodeling of a financial accelerator agent based model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 15(2), pages 413-440, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:86:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10898-022-01245-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.