IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v83y2022i3d10.1007_s10898-021-01115-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Speed scaling scheduling of multiprocessor jobs with energy constraint and makespan criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Kononov

    (Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RAS)

  • Yulia Zakharova

    (Sobolev Institute of Mathematics SB RAS)

Abstract

We are given a set of parallel jobs that have to be executed on a set of speed-scalable processors varying their speeds dynamically. Running a job at a slower speed is more energy-efficient, however, it takes a longer time and affects the performance. Every job is characterized by the processing volume and the number or the set of the required processors. Our objective is to minimize the maximum completion time so that the energy consumption is not greater than a given energy budget. For various particular cases, we propose polynomial-time approximation algorithms, consisting of two stages. At the first stage, we give an auxiliary convex program. By solving this problem, we get processing times of jobs and a lower bound on the makespan. Then, at the second stage, we transform our problem into the corresponding scheduling problem with the constant speed of processors and construct a feasible schedule. We also obtain an “almost exact” solution for the preemptive settings based on a configuration linear program.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Kononov & Yulia Zakharova, 2022. "Speed scaling scheduling of multiprocessor jobs with energy constraint and makespan criterion," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 539-564, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:83:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01115-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-021-01115-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-021-01115-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-021-01115-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keqin Li, 1999. "Analysis of the List Scheduling Algorithm for Precedence Constrained Parallel Tasks," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 73-88, July.
    2. Evripidis Bampis & Alexander Kononov & Dimitrios Letsios & Giorgio Lucarelli & Maxim Sviridenko, 2018. "Energy-efficient scheduling and routing via randomized rounding," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 35-51, February.
    3. Peter Brucker & Sigrid Knust & Duncan Roper & Yakov Zinder, 2000. "Scheduling UET task systems with concurrency on two parallel identical processors," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 52(3), pages 369-387, December.
    4. Shabtay, Dvir & Kaspi, Moshe, 2006. "Parallel machine scheduling with a convex resource consumption function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 92-107, August.
    5. Marco E. T. Gerards & Johann L. Hurink & Philip K. F. Hölzenspies, 2016. "A survey of offline algorithms for energy minimization under deadline constraints," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 3-19, February.
    6. Yurii Nesterov, 2018. "Lectures on Convex Optimization," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-91578-4, June.
    7. Alexander Kononov & Yulia Kovalenko, 2020. "Approximation algorithms for energy-efficient scheduling of parallel jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 693-709, December.
    8. Kubale, Marek, 1996. "Preemptive versus nonpreemptive scheduling of biprocessor tasks on dedicated processors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 242-251, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Kononov & Yulia Kovalenko, 2020. "Approximation algorithms for energy-efficient scheduling of parallel jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 693-709, December.
    2. Shota Takahashi & Mituhiro Fukuda & Mirai Tanaka, 2022. "New Bregman proximal type algorithms for solving DC optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 893-931, December.
    3. Liu Guiqing & Li Kai & Cheng Bayi, 2015. "Preemptive Scheduling with Controllable Processing Times on Parallel Machines," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 68-76, February.
    4. A. Scagliotti & P. Colli Franzone, 2022. "A piecewise conservative method for unconstrained convex optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 251-288, January.
    5. Xin Jiang & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2022. "Bregman primal–dual first-order method and application to sparse semidefinite programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 127-159, January.
    6. Philippe Lacomme & Aziz Moukrim & Alain Quilliot & Marina Vinot, 2019. "Integration of routing into a resource-constrained project scheduling problem," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(4), pages 421-464, December.
    7. Huiyi Cao & Kamil A. Khan, 2023. "General convex relaxations of implicit functions and inverse functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 545-572, July.
    8. Francisco García Riesgo & Sergio Luis Suárez Gómez & Enrique Díez Alonso & Carlos González-Gutiérrez & Jesús Daniel Santos, 2021. "Fully Convolutional Approaches for Numerical Approximation of Turbulent Phases in Solar Adaptive Optics," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Pavel Shcherbakov & Mingyue Ding & Ming Yuchi, 2021. "Random Sampling Many-Dimensional Sets Arising in Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Liam Madden & Stephen Becker & Emiliano Dall’Anese, 2021. "Bounds for the Tracking Error of First-Order Online Optimization Methods," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 437-457, May.
    11. Shariat Torbaghan, Shahab & Madani, Mehdi & Sels, Peter & Virag, Ana & Le Cadre, Hélène & Kessels, Kris & Mou, Yuting, 2021. "Designing day-ahead multi-carrier markets for flexibility: Models and clearing algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2023. "Sensitivity analyses informed by tests for bias in observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 475-487, March.
    13. Xue Gao & Xingju Cai & Deren Han, 2020. "A Gauss–Seidel type inertial proximal alternating linearized minimization for a class of nonconvex optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 863-887, April.
    14. Jean-Jacques Forneron, 2023. "Noisy, Non-Smooth, Non-Convex Estimation of Moment Condition Models," Papers 2301.07196, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    15. Azimbek Khudoyberdiev & Shabir Ahmad & Israr Ullah & DoHyeun Kim, 2020. "An Optimization Scheme Based on Fuzzy Logic Control for Efficient Energy Consumption in Hydroponics Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    16. David Müller & Vladimir Shikhman, 2022. "Network manipulation algorithm based on inexact alternating minimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 627-664, October.
    17. Mehdi Karimi & Levent Tunçel, 2020. "Primal–Dual Interior-Point Methods for Domain-Driven Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 591-621, May.
    18. Akiyoshi Shioura & Natalia V. Shakhlevich & Vitaly A. Strusevich & Bernhard Primas, 2018. "Models and algorithms for energy-efficient scheduling with immediate start of jobs," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 505-516, October.
    19. Fosgerau, Mogens & Melo, Emerson & Shum, Matthew & Sørensen, Jesper R.-V., 2021. "Some remarks on CCP-based estimators of dynamic models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    20. Ramon de Punder & Timo Dimitriadis & Rutger-Jan Lange, 2024. "Kullback-Leibler-based characterizations of score-driven updates," Papers 2408.02391, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:83:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01115-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.