IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v82y2022i4d10.1007_s10898-021-01043-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternating DC algorithm for partial DC programming problems

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Pham Dinh

    (Ton Duc Thang University
    Faculty of Mathematics and Statistics, Ton Duc Thang University)

  • Van Ngai Huynh

    (University of Quynhon)

  • Hoai An Le Thi

    (LGIPM, University of Lorraine)

  • Vinh Thanh Ho

    (LGIPM, University of Lorraine)

Abstract

DC (Difference of Convex functions) programming and DCA (DC Algorithm) play a key role in nonconvex programming framework. These tools have a rich and successful history of thirty five years of development, and the research in recent years is being increasingly explored to new trends in the development of DCA: design novel DCA variants to improve standard DCA, to deal with the scalability and with broader classes than DC programs. Following these trends, we address in this paper the two wide classes of nonconvex problems, called partial DC programs and generalized partial DC programs, and investigate an alternating approach based on DCA for them. A partial DC program in two variables $$(x,y)\in \mathbb {R}^{n}\times {\mathbb {R}}^{m}$$ ( x , y ) ∈ R n × R m takes the form of a standard DC program in each variable while fixing other variable. A so-named alternating DCA and its inexact/generalized versions are developed. The convergence properties of these algorithms are established: both exact and inexact alternating DCA converge to a weak critical point of the considered problem, in particular, when the Kurdyka–Łojasiewicz inequality property is satisfied, the algorithms furnish a Fréchet/Clarke critical point. The proposed algorithms are implemented on the problem of finding an intersection point of two nonconvex sets. Numerical experiments are performed on an important application that is robust principal component analysis. Numerical results show the efficiency and the superiority of the alternating DCA comparing with the standard DCA as well as a well known alternating projection algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Pham Dinh & Van Ngai Huynh & Hoai An Le Thi & Vinh Thanh Ho, 2022. "Alternating DC algorithm for partial DC programming problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 897-928, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:82:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01043-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-021-01043-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-021-01043-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-021-01043-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hédy Attouch & Jérôme Bolte & Patrick Redont & Antoine Soubeyran, 2010. "Proximal Alternating Minimization and Projection Methods for Nonconvex Problems: An Approach Based on the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz Inequality," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 438-457, May.
    2. Le An & Pham Tao, 2005. "The DC (Difference of Convex Functions) Programming and DCA Revisited with DC Models of Real World Nonconvex Optimization Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 23-46, January.
    3. Hoai An Le Thi & Van Ngai Huynh & Tao Pham Dinh, 2018. "Convergence Analysis of Difference-of-Convex Algorithm with Subanalytic Data," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 103-126, October.
    4. Kaisa Joki & Adil M. Bagirov & Napsu Karmitsa & Marko M. Mäkelä, 2017. "A proximal bundle method for nonsmooth DC optimization utilizing nonconvex cutting planes," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 501-535, July.
    5. Jong-Shi Pang & Meisam Razaviyayn & Alberth Alvarado, 2017. "Computing B-Stationary Points of Nonsmooth DC Programs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 95-118, January.
    6. Carl Eckart & Gale Young, 1936. "The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 1(3), pages 211-218, September.
    7. Welington Oliveira, 2020. "Sequential Difference-of-Convex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 936-959, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. M. Bagirov & N. Hoseini Monjezi & S. Taheri, 2021. "An augmented subgradient method for minimizing nonsmooth DC functions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 411-438, November.
    2. Min Tao & Jiang-Ning Li, 2023. "Error Bound and Isocost Imply Linear Convergence of DCA-Based Algorithms to D-Stationarity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 205-232, April.
    3. Hongbo Dong & Min Tao, 2021. "On the Linear Convergence to Weak/Standard d-Stationary Points of DCA-Based Algorithms for Structured Nonsmooth DC Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 190-220, April.
    4. Welington Oliveira, 2020. "Sequential Difference-of-Convex Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 936-959, September.
    5. Welington Oliveira, 2019. "Proximal bundle methods for nonsmooth DC programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(2), pages 523-563, October.
    6. W. Ackooij & S. Demassey & P. Javal & H. Morais & W. Oliveira & B. Swaminathan, 2021. "A bundle method for nonsmooth DC programming with application to chance-constrained problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 451-490, March.
    7. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2023. "DC semidefinite programming and cone constrained DC optimization II: local search methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 993-1031, July.
    8. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2023. "Sparse optimization via vector k-norm and DC programming with an application to feature selection for support vector machines," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 745-766, November.
    9. Hoai An Thi & Thi Minh Tam Nguyen & Tao Pham Dinh, 2023. "On solving difference of convex functions programs with linear complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 163-197, September.
    10. Dongdong Zhang & Shaohua Pan & Shujun Bi & Defeng Sun, 2023. "Zero-norm regularized problems: equivalent surrogates, proximal MM method and statistical error bound," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 627-667, November.
    11. Pietro D’Alessandro & Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2024. "The Descent–Ascent Algorithm for DC Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 657-671, March.
    12. Abbaszadehpeivasti, Hadi, 2024. "Performance analysis of optimization methods for machine learning," Other publications TiSEM 3050a62d-1a1f-494e-99ef-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico & Adil M. Bagirov, 2018. "Minimizing nonsmooth DC functions via successive DC piecewise-affine approximations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 37-55, May.
    14. Marah-Lisanne Thormann & Phan Tu Vuong & Alain B. Zemkoho, 2024. "The Boosted Difference of Convex Functions Algorithm for Value-at-Risk Constrained Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2402.09194, arXiv.org.
    15. Yitian Qian & Shaohua Pan & Shujun Bi, 2023. "A matrix nonconvex relaxation approach to unconstrained binary polynomial programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 875-919, April.
    16. Hoai An Le Thi & Vinh Thanh Ho & Tao Pham Dinh, 2019. "A unified DC programming framework and efficient DCA based approaches for large scale batch reinforcement learning," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 279-310, February.
    17. Outi Montonen & Kaisa Joki, 2018. "Bundle-based descent method for nonsmooth multiobjective DC optimization with inequality constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 403-429, November.
    18. Wim Ackooij & Welington Oliveira, 2019. "Nonsmooth and Nonconvex Optimization via Approximate Difference-of-Convex Decompositions," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 49-80, July.
    19. Chen Chen & Ting Kei Pong & Lulin Tan & Liaoyuan Zeng, 2020. "A difference-of-convex approach for split feasibility with applications to matrix factorizations and outlier detection," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 107-136, September.
    20. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2022. "DC Semidefinite programming and cone constrained DC optimization I: theory," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 649-671, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:82:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01043-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.