IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v80y2021i4d10.1007_s10898-021-01046-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convex hull representations for bounded products of variables

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt M. Anstreicher

    (University of Iowa)

  • Samuel Burer

    (University of Iowa)

  • Kyungchan Park

    (University of Iowa)

Abstract

It is well known that the convex hull of $$\{{(x,y,xy)}\}$$ { ( x , y , x y ) } , where (x, y) is constrained to lie in a box, is given by the reformulation-linearization technique (RLT) constraints. Belotti et al. (Electron Notes Discrete Math 36:805–812, 2010) and Miller et al. (SIAG/OPT Views News 22(1):1–8, 2011) showed that if there are additional upper and/or lower bounds on the product $$z=xy$$ z = x y , then the convex hull can be represented by adding an infinite family of inequalities, requiring a separation algorithm to implement. Nguyen et al. (Math Progr 169(2):377–415, 2018) derived convex hulls for $$\{(x,y,z)\}$$ { ( x , y , z ) } with bounds on $$z=xy^b$$ z = x y b , $$b\ge 1$$ b ≥ 1 . We focus on the case where $$b=1$$ b = 1 and show that the convex hull with either an upper bound or lower bound on the product is given by RLT constraints, the bound on z and a single second-order cone (SOC) constraint. With both upper and lower bounds on the product, the convex hull can be represented using no more than three SOC constraints, each applicable on a subset of (x, y) values. In addition to the convex hull characterizations, volumes of the convex hulls with either an upper or lower bound on z are calculated and compared to the relaxation that imposes only the RLT constraints. As an application of these volume results, we show how spatial branching can be applied to the product variable so as to minimize the sum of the volumes for the two resulting subproblems.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt M. Anstreicher & Samuel Burer & Kyungchan Park, 2021. "Convex hull representations for bounded products of variables," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 757-778, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:80:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01046-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-021-01046-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-021-01046-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-021-01046-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Alfaki & Dag Haugland, 2013. "Strong formulations for the pooling problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 897-916, July.
    2. Faiz A. Al-Khayyal & James E. Falk, 1983. "Jointly Constrained Biconvex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 273-286, May.
    3. Emily Speakman & Jon Lee, 2018. "On branching-point selection for trilinear monomials in spatial branch-and-bound: the hull relaxation," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 129-153, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radu Baltean-Lugojan & Ruth Misener, 2018. "Piecewise parametric structure in the pooling problem: from sparse strongly-polynomial solutions to NP-hardness," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 655-690, August.
    2. Natashia Boland & Thomas Kalinowski & Fabian Rigterink, 2016. "New multi-commodity flow formulations for the pooling problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 669-710, December.
    3. Wei Jiang & Huiqiang Wang & Bingyang Li & Haibin Lv & Qingchuan Meng, 2020. "A multi-user multi-operator computing pricing method for Internet of things based on bi-level optimization," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(1), pages 15501477199, January.
    4. N. V. Thoai, 2000. "Duality Bound Method for the General Quadratic Programming Problem with Quadratic Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 107(2), pages 331-354, November.
    5. Evrim Dalkiran & Hanif Sherali, 2013. "Theoretical filtering of RLT bound-factor constraints for solving polynomial programming problems to global optimality," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1147-1172, December.
    6. Gabriele Eichfelder & Peter Kirst & Laura Meng & Oliver Stein, 2021. "A general branch-and-bound framework for continuous global multiobjective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 195-227, May.
    7. Sonia Cafieri & Jon Lee & Leo Liberti, 2010. "On convex relaxations of quadrilinear terms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 661-685, August.
    8. Keith Zorn & Nikolaos Sahinidis, 2014. "Global optimization of general nonconvex problems with intermediate polynomial substructures," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 673-693, July.
    9. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Lu, Jye-Chyi & An, Na & Al-Khayyal, Faiz & Lu, Richard W. & Han, Guanghua, 2014. "Retailer shelf-space management with trade allowance: A Stackelberg game between retailer and manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 133-144.
    10. Al-Khayyal, Faiz & Hwang, Seung-June, 2007. "Inventory constrained maritime routing and scheduling for multi-commodity liquid bulk, Part I: Applications and model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 106-130, January.
    11. Manuel Ruiz & Olivier Briant & Jean-Maurice Clochard & Bernard Penz, 2013. "Large-scale standard pooling problems with constrained pools and fixed demands," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 939-956, July.
    12. Marco Locatelli, 2016. "Polyhedral subdivisions and functional forms for the convex envelopes of bilinear, fractional and other bivariate functions over general polytopes," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 629-668, December.
    13. Hezhi Luo & Xiaodong Ding & Jiming Peng & Rujun Jiang & Duan Li, 2021. "Complexity Results and Effective Algorithms for Worst-Case Linear Optimization Under Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 180-197, January.
    14. Kristianto, Yohanes & Helo, Petri, 2014. "Product architecture modularity implications for operations economy of green supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 128-145.
    15. Falk M. Hante & Martin Schmidt, 2019. "Complementarity-based nonlinear programming techniques for optimal mixing in gas networks," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 299-323, September.
    16. Juan P. Ruiz & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2017. "Global optimization of non-convex generalized disjunctive programs: a review on reformulations and relaxation techniques," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 43-58, January.
    17. Wang, Yadong & Meng, Qiang & Du, Yuquan, 2015. "Liner container seasonal shipping revenue management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 141-161.
    18. Luathep, Paramet & Sumalee, Agachai & Lam, William H.K. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Lo, Hong K., 2011. "Global optimization method for mixed transportation network design problem: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 808-827, June.
    19. E Bustamante-Cedeño & S Arora, 2008. "Stochastic and minimum regret formulations for transmission network expansion planning under uncertainties," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1547-1556, November.
    20. Kristianto, Yohanes & Helo, Petri, 2015. "Reprint of “Product architecture modularity implications for operations economy of green supply chains”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 63-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:80:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10898-021-01046-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.