IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v78y2020i2d10.1007_s10898-020-00884-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling and solving the multi-quays berth allocation and crane assignment problem with availability constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Issam Krimi

    (OCP Group
    Mohamed 6 Polytechnic University
    LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France
    Mohammed 5 University)

  • Raca Todosijević

    (LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France)

  • Rachid Benmansour

    (LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France
    INSEA)

  • Mustapha Ratli

    (LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France)

  • Abdessamad Ait Cadi

    (LAMIH UMR CNRS 8201, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France)

  • Afaf Aloullal

    (Mohamed 6 Polytechnic University)

Abstract

In this work, we are interested in the multi-quays berth allocation and crane assignment problem under availability restrictions. Availability restrictions may arise due weather conditions, or when, for example, cranes must undergo planned maintenance in order to stay in good performance. This problem was inspired by a real-case of a bulk port in Morocco. To solve the problem we propose at first a mixed-integer programming model. Then, in view of the limitations of the proposed model, we investigate a set of heuristics based on general variable neighborhood search with three variants of variable neighborhood descent as a local search. To validate the proposed model and the proposed heuristic approach, real-world instances are used. The computational results reveal that CPLEX MIP solver consumes a lot of CPU time to solve this model, even sometimes failing to guarantee the optimality of the provided solution. On the other hand, the proposed GVNS heuristic turns out to be very efficient in solving the considered problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Issam Krimi & Raca Todosijević & Rachid Benmansour & Mustapha Ratli & Abdessamad Ait Cadi & Afaf Aloullal, 2020. "Modelling and solving the multi-quays berth allocation and crane assignment problem with availability constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 349-373, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:78:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00884-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-020-00884-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-020-00884-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-020-00884-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Pierre & Mladenovic, Nenad & Moreno Pérez, Jos´e A., 2008. "Variable neighborhood search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 593-595, December.
    2. Young-Man Park & Kap Hwan Kim, 2005. "A scheduling method for Berth and Quay cranes," Springer Books, in: Hans-Otto Günther & Kap Hwan Kim (ed.), Container Terminals and Automated Transport Systems, pages 159-181, Springer.
    3. Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Vacca, Ilaria, 2013. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the berth allocation problem in bulk ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 14-31.
    4. Becker, Christian & Scholl, Armin, 2006. "A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(3), pages 694-715, February.
    5. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    6. Giallombardo, Giovanni & Moccia, Luigi & Salani, Matteo & Vacca, Ilaria, 2010. "Modeling and solving the Tactical Berth Allocation Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 232-245, February.
    7. Andreas T. Ernst & Ceyda Oğuz & Gaurav Singh & Gita Taherkhani, 2017. "Mathematical models for the berth allocation problem in dry bulk terminals," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 459-473, October.
    8. Meisel, Frank & Bierwirth, Christian, 2009. "Heuristics for the integration of crane productivity in the berth allocation problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 196-209, January.
    9. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    10. Pierre Hansen & Nenad Mladenović & Raca Todosijević & Saïd Hanafi, 2017. "Variable neighborhood search: basics and variants," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(3), pages 423-454, September.
    11. Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Expósito-Izquierdo, Christopher & Melián-Batista, Belén & Moreno-Vega, J. Marcos, 2016. "A Set-Partitioning-based model for the Berth Allocation Problem under Time-Dependent Limitations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 1001-1012.
    12. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    13. Xu, Dongsheng & Li, Chung-Lun & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2012. "Berth allocation with time-dependent physical limitations on vessels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 47-56.
    14. Chang, Daofang & Jiang, Zuhua & Yan, Wei & He, Junliang, 2010. "Integrating berth allocation and quay crane assignments," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 975-990, November.
    15. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    16. Ilaria Vacca & Matteo Salani & Michel Bierlaire, 2013. "An Exact Algorithm for the Integrated Planning of Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 148-161, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Haoming & Du, Jian & Zhu, Zhihong, 2022. "The berth assignment and allocation problem considering cooperative liner carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Du, Jian & Gao, Ziyou & Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2024. "Integrated planning of berth allocation, quay crane assignment and yard assignment in multiple cooperative terminals," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Gao, Zhendi & Ji, Mingjun & Kong, Lingrui & Hou, Xinhao, 2024. "Scheduling of automated ore terminal operations based on fixed inflow rhythm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Rodrigues, Filipe & Agra, Agostinho, 2022. "Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 501-524.
    5. Hamza Bouzekri & Gülgün Alpan & Vincent Giard, 2022. "Integrated Laycan and Berth Allocation Problem with ship stability and conveyor routing constraints in bulk ports," Working Papers hal-03431793, HAL.
    6. Guo, Liming & Zheng, Jianfeng & Liang, Jinpeng & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 3-28.
    7. Angelo Sifaleras & Nenad Mladenović & Panos M. Pardalos, 2020. "Preface to the special issue “ICVNS 2018”," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 239-240, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Changchun, 2020. "Iterative heuristic for simultaneous allocations of berths, quay cranes, and yards under practical situations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Zhen, Lu & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian & Wang, Kai, 2022. "Integrated berth and yard space allocation under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-27.
    4. Kai Wang & Lu Zhen & Shuaian Wang, 2018. "Column Generation for the Integrated Berth Allocation, Quay Crane Assignment, and Yard Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 812-834, August.
    5. Zhen, Lu & Liang, Zhe & Zhuge, Dan & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2017. "Daily berth planning in a tidal port with channel flow control," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 193-217.
    6. Hsien-Pin Hsu & Tai-Lin Chiang & Chia-Nan Wang & Hsin-Pin Fu & Chien-Chang Chou, 2019. "A Hybrid GA with Variable Quay Crane Assignment for Solving Berth Allocation Problem and Quay Crane Assignment Problem Simultaneously," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan, 2017. "Improved formulations and an Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 123-147.
    8. Fanrui Xie & Tao Wu & Canrong Zhang, 2019. "A Branch-and-Price Algorithm for the Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1427-1454, September.
    9. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    10. Sung Won Cho & Hyun Ji Park & Chulung Lee, 2021. "An integrated method for berth allocation and quay crane assignment to allow for reassignment of vessels to other terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(1), pages 123-153, March.
    11. Agra, Agostinho & Oliveira, Maryse, 2018. "MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 138-148.
    12. Liu, Baoli & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sheng, Dian & Wang, Yadong, 2021. "Integrated planning of berth allocation and vessel sequencing in a seaport with one-way navigation channel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 23-47.
    13. Wang, Tingsong & Wang, Xinchang & Meng, Qiang, 2018. "Joint berth allocation and quay crane assignment under different carbon taxation policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 18-36.
    14. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2015. "A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 675-689.
    15. Iris, Çağatay & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 365-389.
    16. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2020. "A two-stage robust optimization approach for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 425-452, June.
    17. Iris, Çağatay & Pacino, Dario & Ropke, Stefan & Larsen, Allan, 2015. "Integrated Berth Allocation and Quay Crane Assignment Problem: Set partitioning models and computational results," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-97.
    18. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun, 2021. "An expanded robust optimisation approach for the berth allocation problem considering uncertain operation time," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun & Miao, Lixin, 2017. "A bi-objective robust model for berth allocation scheduling under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 294-319.
    20. Correcher, Juan Francisco & Van den Bossche, Thomas & Alvarez-Valdes, Ramon & Vanden Berghe, Greet, 2019. "The berth allocation problem in terminals with irregular layouts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1096-1108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:78:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-020-00884-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.