IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v7y2024i2d10.1007_s42001-024-00288-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morality and partisan social media engagement: a natural language examination of moral political messaging and engagement during the 2018 US midterm elections

Author

Listed:
  • Meng-Jie Wang

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Kumar Yogeeswaran

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Kyle Nash

    (University of Alberta)

  • Sivanand Sivaram

    (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

Despite numerous studies examining the impact of moral vs. nonmoral political content on social media engagement, the specifics of how distinct moral messaging captivates public attention remain unexplored. Scrutinizing over 10,000 original tweets from 2018 US Senate election candidates, the present work addresses this gap through natural language processing combined with machine and deep learning to probe (a) Are certain types of moral messaging among US politicians more effective in garnering attention?; and (b) If so, does this pattern differ among Democrats and Republicans online? While an unequal distribution emerged, wherein morally charged content elicited more responses than nonmoral rhetoric on both sides of the political aisle, the results indicate varying sensitivities between the factions to certain moral messaging, with Democrats being driven not only by care/harm and fairness/cheating but also by those signaling betrayal, subversion, or even degradation, whereas Republicans were captivated by a broader spectrum of concerns, including care/harm, fairness/cheating, loyalty/betrayal, authority/subversion, and purity. Given that social media is becoming increasingly pivotal in politics today, such findings advance our understanding by untangling how advanced methodologies can dissect the intricacies of moralities in the digital realm, shedding light on the potential dynamics and strategies through which Democratic vs. Republican candidates adopt to expand their reach via social media politicking.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng-Jie Wang & Kumar Yogeeswaran & Kyle Nash & Sivanand Sivaram, 2024. "Morality and partisan social media engagement: a natural language examination of moral political messaging and engagement during the 2018 US midterm elections," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1699-1726, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00288-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00288-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00288-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00288-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Boeck, Paul & Bakker, Marjan & Zwitser, Robert & Nivard, Michel & Hofman, Abe & Tuerlinckx, Francis & Partchev, Ivailo, 2011. "The Estimation of Item Response Models with the lmer Function from the lme4 Package in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i12).
    2. Marlon Mooijman & Joe Hoover & Ying Lin & Heng Ji & Morteza Dehghani, 2018. "Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 389-396, June.
    3. Jason W. Burton & Nicole Cruz & Ulrike Hahn, 2021. "Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(12), pages 1629-1635, December.
    4. Meng-Jie Wang & Kumar Yogeeswaran & Sivanand Sivaram & Kyle Nash, 2021. "Examining spread of emotional political content among Democratic and Republican candidates during the 2018 US mid-term elections," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Paul G. Lewis, 2019. "Moral Foundations in the 2015-16 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates: The Positive and Negative Moral Vocabulary of Partisan Elites," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Albert Padró-Solanet & Joan Balcells, 2022. "Media Diet and Polarisation: Evidence from Spain," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 75-95, January.
    7. Blair Kidwell & Adam Farmer & David M. Hardesty, 2013. "Getting Liberals and Conservatives to Go Green: Political Ideology and Congruent Appeals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 350-367.
    8. Sandeepa Kannangara & Wayne Wobcke, 2022. "Determining political interests of issue-motivated groups on social media: joint topic models for issues, sentiment and stance," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 811-840, May.
    9. Broockman, David E. & Skovron, Christopher, 2018. "Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(3), pages 542-563, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés López-Sepulcre & Sebastiano De Bona & Janne K. Valkonen & Kate D.L. Umbers & Johanna Mappes, 2015. "Item Response Trees: a recommended method for analyzing categorical data in behavioral studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1268-1273.
    2. Beth L. Fossen & Girish Mallapragada & Anwesha De, 2021. "Impact of Political Television Advertisements on Viewers’ Response to Subsequent Advertisements," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 305-324, March.
    3. Syed Latifi & Okan Bulut & Mark Gierl & Thomas Christie & Shehzad Jeeva, 2016. "Differential Performance on National Exams," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, June.
    4. Janne Tukiainen & Sebastian Blesse & Albrecht Bohne & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Jan Jäässkeläinen & Ari Luukinen & Antti Sieppi, 2021. "What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials," EconPol Working Paper 63, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    5. Dixon, Darcie & Mikolon, Sven, 2021. "Cents of self: How and when self-signals influence consumer value derived from choices of green products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 365-386.
    6. Naderi, Iman & Paswan, Audhesh K. & Guzman, Francisco, 2018. "Beyond the shadow of a doubt: The effect of consumer knowledge on restaurant evaluation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 221-229.
    7. Eugene Y. Chan & Jack Lin, 2022. "Political ideology and psychological reactance: how serious should climate change be?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Hu, Saiquan & Jia, Xiao & Zhang, Xiaojin & Zheng, Xiaoying & Zhu, Junming, 2017. "How political ideology affects climate perception: Moderation effects of time orientation and knowledge," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 124-131.
    9. Joshua B. Gilbert & James S. Kim & Luke W. Miratrix, 2023. "Modeling Item-Level Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With the Explanatory Item Response Model: Leveraging Large-Scale Online Assessments to Pinpoint the Impact of Educational Interventions," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(6), pages 889-913, December.
    10. Kelly S. Fielding & Matthew J. Hornsey & Ha Anh Thai & Li Li Toh, 2020. "Using ingroup messengers and ingroup values to promote climate change policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 181-199, January.
    11. Minjeong Jeon & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2012. "Profile-Likelihood Approach for Estimating Generalized Linear Mixed Models With Factor Structures," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(4), pages 518-542, August.
    12. Verena Schoenmueller & Oded Netzer & Florian Stahl, 2023. "Frontiers: Polarized America: From Political Polarization to Preference Polarization," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 48-60, January.
    13. Noah Castelo & Adrian F Ward, 2021. "Conservatism predicts aversion to consequential Artificial Intelligence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Ulf J. J. Hahnel & Christian Mumenthaler & Tobia Spampatti & Tobias Brosch, 2020. "Ideology as Filter: Motivated Information Processing and Decision-Making in the Energy Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Karen Page Winterich & Rebecca Walker Reczek & Tamar Makov, 2024. "How lack of knowledge on emissions and psychological biases deter consumers from taking effective action to mitigate climate change," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1475-1494, October.
    16. Septianto, Felix & Northey, Gavin & Dolan, Rebecca, 2019. "The effects of political ideology and message framing on counterfeiting: The mediating role of emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 206-214.
    17. John T. Jost & Melanie Langer & Vishal Singh, 2017. "The Politics of Buying, Boycotting, Complaining, and Disputing: An Extension of the Research Program by Jung, Garbarino, Briley, and Wynhausen," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 503-510.
    18. Andres Karjus & Christine Cuskley, 2024. "Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.
    20. repec:jss:jstsof:40:i05 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Tiansheng Xia & Xiujuan Fan & Jingwei Zhang & Tingting Liu, 2023. "Influence of Complexity in Low-Fat Food Packaging on Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:7:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00288-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.