IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v25y2020i2d10.1007_s13253-020-00386-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sampling Strategies to Estimate Deer Density by Drive Counts

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Fattorini

    (University of Siena)

  • Alberto Meriggi

    (University of Pavia)

  • Enrico Merli

    (Agriculture and Wildlife Service, Regione Emilia – Romagna)

  • Paolo Varuzza

    (Geographica srl)

Abstract

The best evaluation of deer density can be achieved by accurate drive counts of deer performed in all the suitable wooded patches of the area of interest. This would provide the true density within drive areas which, in turn, should be akin to the true density within the study area. Because the drive of all these areas is prohibitive, only a subset is usually driven. Results are highly dependent on the subjective choice of the areas. In the present study, an objective design-based approach is considered to select the areas to be driven according to some probabilistic sampling schemes, and deer density in the whole collection of drive areas is estimated by means of some criteria. The schemes should be able to achieve samples of areas evenly spread onto the study region. The criteria should be able to exploit the information provided by the area sizes. Four sampling strategies are considered, together with methods to estimate their precision. They are evaluated by means of a simulation study performed on artificial and real populations. Results from artificial populations determine the best strategies to be used. Results from real populations show that precise estimates are achieved at the cost of sampling 20% of the drive areas. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Fattorini & Alberto Meriggi & Enrico Merli & Paolo Varuzza, 2020. "Sampling Strategies to Estimate Deer Density by Drive Counts," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 168-185, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:25:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00386-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-020-00386-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-020-00386-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-020-00386-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Grafström & Niklas L. P. Lundström & Lina Schelin, 2012. "Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 514-520, June.
    2. Jean-Claude Deville & Yves Tille, 2004. "Efficient balanced sampling: The cube method," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 893-912, December.
    3. Lorenzo Fattorini, 2006. "Applying the Horvitz-Thompson criterion in complex designs: A computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(2), pages 269-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomasz Bąk, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    2. ak Tomasz B, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    3. Lorenzo Fattorini & Timothy G. Gregoire & Sara Trentini, 2018. "The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 358-373, September.
    4. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    5. G. Alleva & G. Arbia & P. D. Falorsi & V. Nardelli & A. Zuliani, 2023. "Optimal two-stage spatial sampling design for estimating critical parameters of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: Efficiency versus feasibility," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 983-999, September.
    6. Sara Franceschi & Rosa Maria Di Biase & Agnese Marcelli & Lorenzo Fattorini, 2022. "Some Empirical Results on Nearest-Neighbour Pseudo-populations for Resampling from Spatial Populations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    8. Cindy L. Yu & Jie Li & Michael G. Karl & Todd J. Krueger, 2020. "Obtaining a Balanced Area Sample for the Bureau of Land Management Rangeland Survey," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 250-275, June.
    9. R. Benedetti & F. Piersimoni & P. Postiglione, 2017. "Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 249-264, December.
    10. Yves Tillé, 2022. "Some Solutions Inspired by Survey Sampling Theory to Build Effective Clinical Trials," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 481-498, December.
    11. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2017. "Spatially Balanced Sampling: A Review and A Reappraisal," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 439-454, December.
    12. Raphaël Jauslin & Yves Tillé, 2020. "Spatial Spread Sampling Using Weakly Associated Vectors," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 431-451, September.
    13. Wilmer Prentius, 2024. "Locally correlated Poisson sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), March.
    14. Wadoux, Alexandre M.J.-C. & Heuvelink, Gerard B.M. & de Bruin, Sytze & Brus, Dick J., 2021. "Spatial cross-validation is not the right way to evaluate map accuracy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 457(C).
    15. Sara Franceschi & Gianni Betti & Lorenzo Fattorini & Francesca Gagliardi & Gianni Montrone, 2022. "Balanced sampling of boxes from batches for assessing quality of fruits and vegetables in EU countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2821-2839, August.
    16. Matei Alina, 2021. "Book Review," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(4), pages 1079-1081, December.
    17. Louis Geiler & Séverine Affeldt & Mohamed Nadif, 2022. "A survey on machine learning methods for churn prediction," Post-Print hal-03824873, HAL.
    18. Pommerening, Arne & Szmyt, Janusz & Zhang, Gongqiao, 2020. "A new nearest-neighbour index for monitoring spatial size diversity: The hyperbolic tangent index," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    19. Louis‐Paul Rivest & Serigne Abib Gaye, 2023. "Using Survey Sampling Algorithms For Exact Inference in Logistic Regression," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 18-34, April.
    20. Lennart Bondesson, 2010. "Conditional and Restricted Pareto Sampling: Two New Methods for Unequal Probability Sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(3), pages 514-530, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:25:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-020-00386-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.