IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v75y2017i3d10.1007_s40300-017-0123-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples

Author

Listed:
  • R. Benedetti

    (“G. d’Annunzio” University)

  • F. Piersimoni

    (Istat, Directorate for Methodology and Statistical Process Design)

  • P. Postiglione

    (“G. d’Annunzio” University)

Abstract

The spatial distribution of a population represents an important tool in sampling designs that use the geographical coordinates of the units in the frame as auxiliary information. These data may represent a source of auxiliaries that can be helpful to design effective sampling strategies, which, assuming that the observed phenomenon is related with the spatial features of the population, could gather a considerable gain in their efficiency by a proper use of this particular information. We present and compare various methods to select spatially balanced samples. These selection algorithms are compared with the intuitive principle of partitioning the space into n strata and selecting only one unit per stratum. The fundamental interest is not only to evaluate the effectiveness of such different approaches, but also to understand if it is possible to combine them to obtain more efficient sampling designs. The performances of the spatially balanced designs are compared in terms of their root mean squared error using the simple random sampling without replacement as benchmark. An important result is that these complex designs provide better results than the simple principle of stratifying the study area. It also does not help so much to improve efficiencies even if it is combined with balancing on known totals of some auxiliary variables, such as the geographic coordinates.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Benedetti & F. Piersimoni & P. Postiglione, 2017. "Alternative and complementary approaches to spatially balanced samples," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 249-264, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:75:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-017-0123-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-017-0123-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40300-017-0123-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-017-0123-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Michela Dickson & Yves Tillé, 2016. "Ordered spatial sampling by means of the traveling salesman problem," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1359-1372, December.
    2. Lorenzo Fattorini & Piermaria Corona & Gherardo Chirici & Maria Chiara Pagliarella, 2015. "Design‐based strategies for sampling spatial units from regular grids with applications to forest surveys, land use, and land cover estimation," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 216-228, May.
    3. Bivand, Roger & Piras, Gianfranco, 2015. "Comparing Implementations of Estimation Methods for Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i18).
    4. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2015. "Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-46008-5.
    5. Anton Grafström & Niklas L. P. Lundström & Lina Schelin, 2012. "Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 514-520, June.
    6. F. J. Breidt & G. Chauvet, 2012. "Penalized balanced sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(4), pages 945-958.
    7. Rasmus Plenge Waagepetersen, 2007. "An Estimating Function Approach to Inference for Inhomogeneous Neyman–Scott Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 252-258, March.
    8. Jean-Claude Deville & Yves Tille, 2004. "Efficient balanced sampling: The cube method," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 91(4), pages 893-912, December.
    9. Stevens, Don L. & Olsen, Anthony R., 2004. "Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 262-278, January.
    10. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2017. "Spatially Balanced Sampling: A Review and A Reappraisal," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 439-454, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean D. Opsomer & M. Giovanna Ranalli & Maria Michela Dickson, 2017. "Foreword to the special issue on “Advances in Survey Statistics”," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 245-247, December.
    2. Huan Xie & Fang Wang & Yali Gong & Xiaohua Tong & Yanmin Jin & Ang Zhao & Chao Wei & Xinyi Zhang & Shicheng Liao, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling for Validation of GlobeLand30 Using Landscape Pattern-Based Inclusion Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Robertson, Blair & Price, Chris, 2024. "One point per cluster spatially balanced sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    2. Roberto Benedetti & Federica Piersimoni & Paolo Postiglione, 2017. "Spatially Balanced Sampling: A Review and A Reappraisal," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 439-454, December.
    3. Yves Tillé, 2022. "Some Solutions Inspired by Survey Sampling Theory to Build Effective Clinical Trials," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 481-498, December.
    4. Raphaël Jauslin & Yves Tillé, 2020. "Spatial Spread Sampling Using Weakly Associated Vectors," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 431-451, September.
    5. Tomasz Bąk, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    6. Huan Xie & Fang Wang & Yali Gong & Xiaohua Tong & Yanmin Jin & Ang Zhao & Chao Wei & Xinyi Zhang & Shicheng Liao, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling for Validation of GlobeLand30 Using Landscape Pattern-Based Inclusion Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Linda Altieri & Daniela Cocchi, 2021. "Spatial Sampling for Non‐compact Patterns," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 532-549, December.
    8. Wilmer Prentius, 2024. "Locally correlated Poisson sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), March.
    9. Chauvet, Guillaume & Ruiz-Gazen, Anne, 2017. "A comparison of pivotal sampling and unequal probability sampling with replacement," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-5.
    10. ak Tomasz B, 2021. "Spatial sampling methods modified by model use," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 22(2), pages 143-154, June.
    11. Raphaël Jauslin & Bardia Panahbehagh & Yves Tillé, 2022. "Sequential spatially balanced sampling," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), December.
    12. Sara Franceschi & Rosa Maria Di Biase & Agnese Marcelli & Lorenzo Fattorini, 2022. "Some Empirical Results on Nearest-Neighbour Pseudo-populations for Resampling from Spatial Populations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16, April.
    13. B. L. Robertson & O. Ozturk & O. Kravchuk & J. A. Brown, 2022. "Spatially Balanced Sampling with Local Ranking," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 622-639, December.
    14. Maria Michela Dickson & Yves Tillé, 2016. "Ordered spatial sampling by means of the traveling salesman problem," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1359-1372, December.
    15. Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2024. "Estimation of change with partially overlapping and spatially balanced samples," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    16. Cindy L. Yu & Jie Li & Michael G. Karl & Todd J. Krueger, 2020. "Obtaining a Balanced Area Sample for the Bureau of Land Management Rangeland Survey," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(2), pages 250-275, June.
    17. Zhonglei Wang & Zhengyuan Zhu, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Balanced Sampling Design for Longitudinal Area Surveys," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 245-263, June.
    18. Lorenzo Fattorini & Timothy G. Gregoire & Sara Trentini, 2018. "The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 358-373, September.
    19. Pommerening, Arne & Szmyt, Janusz & Zhang, Gongqiao, 2020. "A new nearest-neighbour index for monitoring spatial size diversity: The hyperbolic tangent index," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    20. G. Alleva & G. Arbia & P. D. Falorsi & V. Nardelli & A. Zuliani, 2023. "Optimal two-stage spatial sampling design for estimating critical parameters of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: Efficiency versus feasibility," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 983-999, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:75:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40300-017-0123-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.