IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v22y2017i3d10.1007_s13253-017-0294-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imputation Approaches for Animal Movement Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Henry Scharf

    (Colorado State University)

  • Mevin B. Hooten

    (U.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Department of Statistics, Colorado State University)

  • Devin S. Johnson

    (Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries)

Abstract

The analysis of telemetry data is common in animal ecological studies. While the collection of telemetry data for individual animals has improved dramatically, the methods to properly account for inherent uncertainties (e.g., measurement error, dependence, barriers to movement) have lagged behind. Still, many new statistical approaches have been developed to infer unknown quantities affecting animal movement or predict movement based on telemetry data. Hierarchical statistical models are useful to account for some of the aforementioned uncertainties, as well as provide population-level inference, but they often come with an increased computational burden. For certain types of statistical models, it is straightforward to provide inference if the latent true animal trajectory is known, but challenging otherwise. In these cases, approaches related to multiple imputation have been employed to account for the uncertainty associated with our knowledge of the latent trajectory. Despite the increasing use of imputation approaches for modeling animal movement, the general sensitivity and accuracy of these methods have not been explored in detail. We provide an introduction to animal movement modeling and describe how imputation approaches may be helpful for certain types of models. We also assess the performance of imputation approaches in two simulation studies. Our simulation studies suggests that inference for model parameters directly related to the location of an individual may be more accurate than inference for parameters associated with higher-order processes such as velocity or acceleration. Finally, we apply these methods to analyze a telemetry data set involving northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) in the Bering Sea. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry Scharf & Mevin B. Hooten & Devin S. Johnson, 2017. "Imputation Approaches for Animal Movement Modeling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 335-352, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:22:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0294-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-017-0294-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-017-0294-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-017-0294-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mevin B. Hooten & Frances E. Buderman & Brian M. Brost & Ephraim M. Hanks & Jacob S. Ivan, 2016. "Hierarchical animal movement models for population‐level inference," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 322-333, September.
    2. Ormerod, J. T. & Wand, M. P., 2010. "Explaining Variational Approximations," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 64(2), pages 140-153.
    3. Brett T. McClintock, 2017. "Incorporating Telemetry Error into Hidden Markov Models of Animal Movement Using Multiple Imputation," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 249-269, September.
    4. Ephraim M Hanks & Mevin B Hooten & Devin S Johnson & Jeremy T Sterling, 2011. "Velocity-Based Movement Modeling for Individual and Population Level Inference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toryn L. J. Schafer & Christopher K. Wikle & Jay A. VonBank & Bart M. Ballard & Mitch D. Weegman, 2020. "A Bayesian Markov Model with Pólya-Gamma Sampling for Estimating Individual Behavior Transition Probabilities from Accelerometer Classifications," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 365-382, September.
    2. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    3. Joshua Hewitt & Robert S. Schick & Alan E. Gelfand, 2021. "Continuous-Time Discrete-State Modeling for Deep Whale Dives," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 180-199, June.
    4. Ethan Lawler & Kim Whoriskey & William H. Aeberhard & Chris Field & Joanna Mills Flemming, 2019. "The Conditionally Autoregressive Hidden Markov Model (CarHMM): Inferring Behavioural States from Animal Tracking Data Exhibiting Conditional Autocorrelation," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 651-668, December.
    5. Xinyi Lu & Mevin B. Hooten & Ann M. Raiho & David K. Swanson & Carl A. Roland & Sarah E. Stehn, 2023. "Latent trajectory models for spatio‐temporal dynamics in Alaskan ecosystems," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3664-3675, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mevin B. Hooten & Ruth King & Roland Langrock, 2017. "Guest Editor’s Introduction to the Special Issue on “Animal Movement Modeling”," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 224-231, September.
    2. Svetlana V. Tishkovskaya & Paul G. Blackwell, 2021. "Bayesian estimation of heterogeneous environments from animal movement data," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), September.
    3. Rub'en Loaiza-Maya & Didier Nibbering, 2022. "Fast variational Bayes methods for multinomial probit models," Papers 2202.12495, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    4. Hajargasht, Gholamreza & Rao, D.S. Prasada, 2019. "Multilateral index number systems for international price comparisons: Properties, existence and uniqueness," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 36-47.
    5. Mevin B. Hooten & Michael R. Schwob & Devin S. Johnson & Jacob S. Ivan, 2023. "Multistage hierarchical capture–recapture models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), September.
    6. Loaiza-Maya, Rubén & Smith, Michael Stanley & Nott, David J. & Danaher, Peter J., 2022. "Fast and accurate variational inference for models with many latent variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 339-362.
    7. Youngseon Lee & Seongil Jo & Jaeyong Lee, 2022. "A variational inference for the Lévy adaptive regression with multiple kernels," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 2493-2515, November.
    8. Asim Ansari & Yang Li & Jonathan Z. Zhang, 2018. "Probabilistic Topic Model for Hybrid Recommender Systems: A Stochastic Variational Bayesian Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 987-1008, November.
    9. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    10. Falk Bräuning & Siem Jan Koopman, 2016. "The dynamic factor network model with an application to global credit risk," Working Papers 16-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    11. Sebastian Jaimungal, 2022. "Reinforcement learning and stochastic optimisation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 103-129, January.
    12. Toryn L. J. Schafer & Christopher K. Wikle & Jay A. VonBank & Bart M. Ballard & Mitch D. Weegman, 2020. "A Bayesian Markov Model with Pólya-Gamma Sampling for Estimating Individual Behavior Transition Probabilities from Accelerometer Classifications," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 365-382, September.
    13. Matias Quiroz & Robert Kohn & Mattias Villani & Minh-Ngoc Tran, 2019. "Speeding Up MCMC by Efficient Data Subsampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 831-843, April.
    14. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Florian Huber & Gary Koop & John Maheu & Didier Nibbering & Anastasios Panagiotelis, 2023. "Bayesian Forecasting in the 21st Century: A Modern Review," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 1/23, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    15. Joshua Chan, 2023. "BVARs and Stochastic Volatility," Papers 2310.14438, arXiv.org.
    16. Gary Koop & Dimitris Korobilis, 2023. "Bayesian Dynamic Variable Selection In High Dimensions," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1047-1074, August.
    17. Elisabeth Waldmann & Thomas Kneib & Yu Ryan Yu & Stefan Lang, 2012. "Bayesian semiparametric additive quantile regression," Working Papers 2012-06, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    18. Bansal, Prateek & Krueger, Rico & Graham, Daniel J., 2021. "Fast Bayesian estimation of spatial count data models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Kazuhiro Yamaguchi & Kensuke Okada, 2020. "Variational Bayes Inference for the DINA Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 45(5), pages 569-597, October.
    20. Korobilis, Dimitris & Koop, Gary, 2018. "Variational Bayes inference in high-dimensional time-varying parameter models," Essex Finance Centre Working Papers 22665, University of Essex, Essex Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:22:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13253-017-0294-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.