IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v22y2017i1d10.1007_s13253-016-0271-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smooth additive mixed models for predicting aboveground biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Mariola Sánchez-González

    (CIFOR-INIA)

  • María Durbán

    (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid)

  • Dae-Jin Lee

    (BCAM - Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Applied Statistics)

  • Isabel Cañellas

    (CIFOR-INIA)

  • Hortensia Sixto

    (CIFOR-INIA)

Abstract

Aboveground biomass estimation in short-rotation forestry plantations is an essential step in the development of crop management strategies as well as allowing the economic viability of the crop to be determined prior to harvesting. Hence, it is important to develop new methodologies that improve the accuracy of predictions, using only a minimum set of easily obtainable information i.e., diameter and height. Many existing models base their predictions only on diameter (mainly due to the complexity of including further covariates), or rely on complicated equations to obtain biomass predictions. However, in tree species, it is important to include height when estimating aboveground biomass because this will vary from one genotype to another. This work proposes the use of a more flexible and easy to implement model for predicting aboveground biomass (stem, branches and total) as a smooth function of height and diameter using smooth additive mixed models which preserve the additive property necessary to model the relationship within wood fractions, and allows the inclusion of random effects and interaction terms. The model is applied to the analysis of three trials carried out in Spain, where nine clones at three different sites are compared. Also, an analysis of slash pine data is carried out in order to compare with the approach proposed by Parresol (Can J For Res 31:865–878, 2001). Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line

Suggested Citation

  • Mariola Sánchez-González & María Durbán & Dae-Jin Lee & Isabel Cañellas & Hortensia Sixto, 2017. "Smooth additive mixed models for predicting aboveground biomass," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(1), pages 23-41, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:22:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-016-0271-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-016-0271-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-016-0271-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-016-0271-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. D. Currie & M. Durban & P. H. C. Eilers, 2006. "Generalized linear array models with applications to multidimensional smoothing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(2), pages 259-280, April.
    2. Angelini, Claudia & De Canditiis, Daniela & Leblanc, Frédérique, 2003. "Wavelet regression estimation in nonparametric mixed effect models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 267-291, May.
    3. Ruppert,David & Wand,M. P. & Carroll,R. J., 2003. "Semiparametric Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521780506, November.
    4. Simon N. Wood, 2006. "Low-Rank Scale-Invariant Tensor Product Smooths for Generalized Additive Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 1025-1036, December.
    5. Eilers, Paul H.C. & Currie, Iain D. & Durban, Maria, 2006. "Fast and compact smoothing on large multidimensional grids," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 61-76, January.
    6. Lee, Dae-Jin & Durbán, María & Eilers, Paul, 2013. "Efficient two-dimensional smoothing with P-spline ANOVA mixed models and nested bases," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 22-37.
    7. Ruppert,David & Wand,M. P. & Carroll,R. J., 2003. "Semiparametric Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521785167, November.
    8. Inyoung Kim & Noah D. Cohen & Raymond J. Carroll, 2003. "Semiparametric Regression Splines in Matched Case-Control Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1158-1169, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arūnas P. Verbyla & Joanne Faveri & John D. Wilkie & Tom Lewis, 2018. "Tensor Cubic Smoothing Splines in Designed Experiments Requiring Residual Modelling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(4), pages 478-508, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Bruno & Fedele Greco & Massimo Ventrucci, 2016. "Non-parametric regression on compositional covariates using Bayesian P-splines," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(1), pages 75-88, March.
    2. Francesca Bruno & Fedele Greco & Massimo Ventrucci, 2016. "Non-parametric regression on compositional covariates using Bayesian P-splines," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(1), pages 75-88, March.
    3. Martin Siebenborn & Julian Wagner, 2021. "A multigrid preconditioner for tensor product spline smoothing," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2379-2411, December.
    4. Arūnas P. Verbyla & Joanne Faveri & John D. Wilkie & Tom Lewis, 2018. "Tensor Cubic Smoothing Splines in Designed Experiments Requiring Residual Modelling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(4), pages 478-508, December.
    5. Basile, Roberto & Durbán, María & Mínguez, Román & María Montero, Jose & Mur, Jesús, 2014. "Modeling regional economic dynamics: Spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity and nonlinearities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 229-245.
    6. Simon N. Wood & Zheyuan Li & Gavin Shaddick & Nicole H. Augustin, 2017. "Generalized Additive Models for Gigadata: Modeling the U.K. Black Smoke Network Daily Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1199-1210, July.
    7. Thomas Kneib & Nadja Klein & Stefan Lang & Nikolaus Umlauf, 2019. "Modular regression - a Lego system for building structured additive distributional regression models with tensor product interactions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(1), pages 1-39, March.
    8. Aris Perperoglou, 2011. "Fitting survival data with penalized Poisson regression," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 20(4), pages 451-462, November.
    9. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    10. Lee, Wang-Sheng & McKinnish, Terra, 2019. "Locus of control and marital satisfaction: Couple perspectives using Australian data," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Jaime Pinilla & Miguel Negrín, 2021. "Non-Parametric Generalized Additive Models as a Tool for Evaluating Policy Interventions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, February.
    12. Rodríguez-Álvarez, María Xosé & Lee, Dae-Jin & Kneib, Thomas & Durbán, María & Eilers, Paul, 2013. "Fast algorithm for smoothing parameter selection in multidimensional generalized P-splines," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws133026, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    13. Otto-Sobotka, Fabian & Salvati, Nicola & Ranalli, Maria Giovanna & Kneib, Thomas, 2019. "Adaptive semiparametric M-quantile regression," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 116-129.
    14. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    15. Hyunju Son & Youyi Fong, 2021. "Fast grid search and bootstrap‐based inference for continuous two‐phase polynomial regression models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), May.
    16. Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R., 2009. "A note on bimodality in the log-likelihood function for penalized spline mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 920-931, February.
    17. Wei Huang & Oliver Linton & Zheng Zhang, 2022. "A Unified Framework for Specification Tests of Continuous Treatment Effect Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1817-1830, October.
    18. Dlugosz, Stephan & Mammen, Enno & Wilke, Ralf A., 2017. "Generalized partially linear regression with misclassified data and an application to labour market transitions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 145-159.
    19. Longhi, Christian & Musolesi, Antonio & Baumont, Catherine, 2014. "Modeling structural change in the European metropolitan areas during the process of economic integration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 395-407.
    20. Zi Ye & Giles Hooker & Stephen P. Ellner, 2021. "Generalized Single Index Models and Jensen Effects on Reproduction and Survival," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 492-512, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:22:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s13253-016-0271-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.